Immunity of Warships: Argentina Initiates Proceedings against Ghana under UNCLOS
Matthew Happold is Professor of Public International Law at the University of Luxembourg and an associate tenant at 3 Hare Court, London. Cross posted at
If you are not happy with the results below please do another search
Matthew Happold is Professor of Public International Law at the University of Luxembourg and an associate tenant at 3 Hare Court, London. Cross posted at
The fourth issue of French Journal du droit international (Clunet) for 2012 was just released. It contains two articles addressing issues of private international law and several casenotes. A full table of content is accessible
I am grateful to Dr. Dafina Sarbinova, an advocate to the Sofia Bar, for this report. In a judgment of of 2 September 2011 (Judgment No. 71 in commercial case No. 1193/2010 ), the highest Bulgarian court – the Bulgarian Supreme Court of Cassation, Commercial Chamber – struck down a one way arbitration/choice of court clause in a […]
On November 2-3, 2012, the Private International Law Interest Group of the American Society of International Law (ASIL) is hosting its
Pluralismo y multiculturalidad: Tribunal arbitral musulmán y consejos islámicos (Sharia courts) en el Reino Unido is the title of the last paper by professor V. Camarero Suárez and professor F. Zamora Cabot, both from the University of Castellón. The paper, written in Spanish, has been published in the Anuario de Derecho Eclesiástico del Estado, 2012; professor […]
Private International Law Inaugural Lecture 29 July Transnational Commercial Law and Conflict of Laws: Institutional Co-operation and Substantive Complementarity Herbert KRONKE, Professor at Heidelberg University General Course 5-16 August Le rôle du politique en droit international privé Patrick KINSCH, Lawyer, Visiting Professor at the University of Luxemburg Special Courses 29 July-2 August Conflict among Enforcement […]
Jan Kleinheisterkamp, Senior Lecturer in Law at the London School of Economics, has written an arcticle dealing with the much commented “Dallah v. Pakistan” case. The article has been published in The Modern Law Review 75 (2012), pp. 639-654. The abstract reads as follows: This note analyses the reasoning of the English and French courts […]
I’ve read this morning the
Recently, the September/October issue of the German law journal “Praxis des Internationalen Privat- und Verfahrensrechts” (