Conflict of Laws
  • About
  • Editorial board
  • Subscription
  • Submission
  • Materials
  • Contact
  • Click to open the search input field Click to open the search input field Search
  • Menu Menu

London Conference on the Brussels I Recast

December 13, 2012/in /by Gilles Cuniberti
image_pdfimage_print

Reed Smith LLP will host a conference organized by the Journal of Private International Law on the Brussels I Regulation Recast on February 7th in London.

Programme:

Chair: Professor Trevor Hartley, LSE

1.30 pm – 2.00 pm: Overview of the revision of the Brussels I Regulation

  • Oliver Parker, Legal Adviser, UK Ministry of Justice

2.00 pm – 2.30pm: Choice of Court Agreements: Reversal of Gasser, etc           

  • Alex Layton QC, 20 Essex Court Chambers, London

2.30 pm – 3.00 pm: The Relationship between Arbitration and Brussels I Revised

  • Dr George Panagopoulos, Reed Smith, Piraeus and London

3.00 pm – 3.30 pm: Question and answer and discussion of the first three talks

3.30 pm – 4.00 pm: Coffee/Tea Break

 

Chair: David Warne, Partner, Reed Smith LLP

4.00 pm – 4.30pm: The Abolition of Procedural Exequatur and Retention of Public Policy

  • Professor Paul Beaumont, University of Aberdeen

4.30 pm – 5.00 pm: Conflicts of Jurisdiction with Third States

  • Professor Jonathan Harris, Serle Court; King’s College London

5.00 pm – 5.30 pm: Extension of Jurisdiction to Third State Defendants and other changes to Brussels I

  • Dr Karen Vandekerckhove, European Union Commission

5.30 pm – 6.00 pm: Question and answer and discussion of the last three talks

6.00 pm: Drinks Reception

Registration:  The event is free but has a limited number of places and therefore you need to register in advance to guarantee a place on a first come first served basis. Please email events@reedsmith.com to register, including the event title “The Brussels I Regulation Recast” in the subject line of the email. Update: the limit has been reached, any new registrant will be put on the waiting list.

Location: Reed Smith LLP, The Broadgate Tower, 20 Primrose Street, London EC2A 2RS

Share this entry
  • Share on Facebook
  • Share on X
  • Share on WhatsApp
  • Share on Pinterest
  • Share on LinkedIn
  • Share on Tumblr
  • Share on Vk
  • Share on Reddit
  • Share by Mail
https://conflictoflaws.net/News/2020/08/CoL_Banner-1.png 0 0 Gilles Cuniberti https://conflictoflaws.net/News/2020/08/CoL_Banner-1.png Gilles Cuniberti2012-12-13 12:44:072013-01-15 03:01:19London Conference on the Brussels I Recast

Categories

  • Views
  • News

Most Recent Posts

  • Support in cross-border transactions by Adults: Contract law vs capacity law August 12, 2026
  • Recognition of Italian Extrajudicial Divorces in Tunisia — Between Methodological Uncertainty and the Need to Preserve Continuity of Personal Status Across Borders August 9, 2026
  • Private International Law and European Society August 4, 2026
  • The New Zealand Supreme Court’s judgment in Kea Investments Ltd v Wikeley on anti-enforcement relief August 3, 2026
  • Beyond Domicile: The BHP Litigation and the Functional Interconnection of Public and Private International Law August 3, 2026
  • Conflicts of jurisdiction in Senegal: lesson from the Senegalese Supreme Court on Lis Pendens and the Exequatur of foreign judgments July 27, 2026
  • Adoption in the proposal for a European Parenthood Regulation July 21, 2026
  • Copyright, Targeting and Geo-Blocking: The CJEU Stirs the Pot July 15, 2026
  • A Follow-Up: The German Judges Association’s Response to the HCCH Draft Text of a Future Convention on Parallel Proceedings and Related Actions July 15, 2026
  • Private International Law Dimensions of Singapore’s New Legislation to Combat Online Harms July 14, 2026
  • The 1961 HCCH Apostille Convention: Why All African Countries Should Ratify It? — Insights from Judicial Practice in Africa July 14, 2026
  • The enforcement of an advance on costs for substitute performance at the expense of a Russian debtor in German-French legal relations July 2, 2026
  • “Yes, in principle, but not quite there yet…” – Some Observations on the Public Consultation on the HCCH Draft Text of a Future Convention on Parallel Proceedings and Related Actions June 29, 2026
  • Judgment Mobility Rules in India’s Private International Law Regime: No place for a revision au fond? June 26, 2026
  • Nothing to See Here: The CJEU’s Decision in Case C-232/25 Idzinski June 18, 2026
Link to: ECJ Rules on Secondary Insolvency Proceedings Link to: ECJ Rules on Secondary Insolvency Proceedings ECJ Rules on Secondary Insolvency Proceedings Link to: Burbank on Outsourcing the Treaty Function Link to: Burbank on Outsourcing the Treaty Function Burbank on Outsourcing the Treaty Function
Scroll to top Scroll to top Scroll to top