Conflict of Laws
  • About
  • Editorial board
  • Subscription
  • Submission
  • Materials
  • Contact
  • Click to open the search input field Click to open the search input field Search
  • Menu Menu

About Andrew Dickinson

This author has not written his bio yet.
But we are proud to say that Andrew Dickinson contributed 60 entries already.

Entries by Andrew Dickinson

Conflict of Laws Across the Ditch

October 11, 2013/2 Comments/in /by Andrew Dickinson

The 

Weighing European Private International Law in the Balance

June 11, 2013/in /by Andrew Dickinson

The United Kingdom Government is currently undertaking a review of the competences of the European Union, asking what the European Union does, and how it affects government and the general public in the United Kingdom. As part of that review, the Ministry of Justice has published a

Comparing Rome II

January 10, 2013/in /by Andrew Dickinson

The Rome II Regulation returns to the spotlight in a seminar to be held at the British Institute of International and Comparative Law’s London fortress on Thursday 31 January 2012 (5:30-7:30pm). The seminar, entitled “Comparative Torts before the Courts: The Impact of Rome II”, is part of the Herbert Smith Freehils Private International Law Seminar […]

Brussels I Recast Set in Stone

December 7, 2012/1 Comment/in /by Andrew Dickinson

At its 3207th meeting held in Brussels, the Council of the European Union has approved the

A Principled Approach to Choice of Law in Contract?

November 22, 2012/in /by Andrew Dickinson

On 16 November, a Special Commission of the Hague Conference on Private International Law approved the text of the

European Parliament Votes to Recast the Brussels I Regulation

November 21, 2012/4 Comments/in /by Andrew Dickinson

Yesterday (20 November 2012) the European Parliament voted, in plenary session, to adopt the

Canberra Calling – update

November 14, 2012/in /by Andrew Dickinson

Following my earlier post about the Commonwealth Attorney-General’s review of Australian private international law rule (text reproduced below, for ease of reference), two consultation papers have now been released on the project website. The

Negative declarations, tort and the Brussels I Regulation

October 27, 2012/1 Comment/in /by Andrew Dickinson

An important, if slightly unexpected, ruling from the CJEU in

By Royal Appointment: No Closer to an EU Private International Law Settlement?

October 24, 2012/1 Comment/in /by Andrew Dickinson

Members of the British Royal Family and aristocracy have long contributed to the development of the law in England governing matters of personal privacy. As long ago as 1849, Prince Albert, the prince consort of Queen Victoria, resorted to the courts to prevent the publication of etchings and drawings by the Royal couple, including of […]

Collective Efforts

October 23, 2012/in /by Andrew Dickinson

A new book focussing on legislation promoting cr0ss-border collective redress has been published by Oxford University Press. Edited by Duncan Fairgrieve and Eva Lein, both of the British Institute for International and Comparative Law,

Page 1 of 6123›»

Categories

  • Views
  • News

Most Recent Posts

  • Conflicts of jurisdiction in Senegal: lesson from the Senegalese Supreme Court on Lis Pendens and the Exequatur of foreign judgments July 27, 2026
  • Adoption in the proposal for a European Parenthood Regulation July 21, 2026
  • Copyright, Targeting and Geo-Blocking: The CJEU Stirs the Pot July 15, 2026
  • A Follow-Up: The German Judges Association’s Response to the HCCH Draft Text of a Future Convention on Parallel Proceedings and Related Actions July 15, 2026
  • Private International Law Dimensions of Singapore’s New Legislation to Combat Online Harms July 14, 2026
  • The 1961 HCCH Apostille Convention: Why All African Countries Should Ratify It? — Insights from Judicial Practice in Africa July 14, 2026
  • The enforcement of an advance on costs for substitute performance at the expense of a Russian debtor in German-French legal relations July 2, 2026
  • “Yes, in principle, but not quite there yet…” – Some Observations on the Public Consultation on the HCCH Draft Text of a Future Convention on Parallel Proceedings and Related Actions June 29, 2026
  • Judgment Mobility Rules in India’s Private International Law Regime: No place for a revision au fond? June 26, 2026
  • Nothing to See Here: The CJEU’s Decision in Case C-232/25 Idzinski June 18, 2026
  • Refusal to Enforce in Egypt of a Californian (U.S.) Judgment for Lack of Reciprocity: What Has Gotten into the Egyptian Supreme Court? June 15, 2026
  • PRC Double Interest neither Double nor Penal: Australian Courts Clear Its Name When Enforcing Chinese Judgments June 10, 2026
  • The AIFC Court, Gazprom v Naftogaz and the Emergence of a New Conduit Jurisdiction Debate June 6, 2026
  • Montana Supreme Court Decides International Child Custody Case June 3, 2026
  • China’s Countering Improper Foreign Extraterritorial Jurisdiction Regulation Blocked EU’s Extraterritorial Data Acquisition May 29, 2026
Scroll to top Scroll to top Scroll to top