Conflict of Laws
  • About
  • Editorial board
  • Subscription
  • Submission
  • Materials
  • Contact
  • Click to open the search input field Click to open the search input field Search
  • Menu Menu

Paper on relief in small and simple matters in an age of austerity

June 2, 2015/1 Comment/in /by Xandra Kramer
image_pdfimage_print

A general report presented at the XVth World Congress of Procedural Law of the International Association of Procedural Law dedicated to effective judicicial relief and remedies in an age of austerity (Istanbul, 25-28 May) on relief in small and simple matters in an age of austerity, authored by Xandra Kramer (Erasmus University Rotterdam) and Shusuke Kakiuchi (University of Tokyo), is available as a working paper on SSRN.

Austerity measures have a big impact on the court financing, legal aid system, and civil procedure in general in many countries. This paper analyses the various types of procedures for small and simple matters from a comparative perspective, based on nineteen national reports, and explores the design and use of these procedures against the background of austerity. The main questions are whether, and if so, in what regard, austerity has affected the availability and use of simplified procedures in the jurisdictions involved in the research, and how these procedures tie in with austerity schemes.

Share this entry
  • Share on Facebook
  • Share on X
  • Share on WhatsApp
  • Share on Pinterest
  • Share on LinkedIn
  • Share on Tumblr
  • Share on Vk
  • Share on Reddit
  • Share by Mail
https://conflictoflaws.net/News/2020/08/CoL_Banner-1.png 0 0 Xandra Kramer https://conflictoflaws.net/News/2020/08/CoL_Banner-1.png Xandra Kramer2015-06-02 21:41:332015-06-02 21:41:33Paper on relief in small and simple matters in an age of austerity
1 reply
  1. Xandra Kramer says:
    June 10, 2015 at 7:10 am

    Economy and austerity measures are indeed not the best parameters for judicial and civil procedure reform. But in times of economic downturn and scarcity of resources it is all the more important to see how the available means can be used most efficiently, and in that regard it calls for reform and redistribution. That is the message we tried to get across in our paper.

Comments are closed.

Categories

  • Views
  • News

Most Recent Posts

  • Conflicts of jurisdiction in Senegal: lesson from the Senegalese Supreme Court on Lis Pendens and the Exequatur of foreign judgments July 27, 2026
  • Adoption in the proposal for a European Parenthood Regulation July 21, 2026
  • Copyright, Targeting and Geo-Blocking: The CJEU Stirs the Pot July 15, 2026
  • A Follow-Up: The German Judges Association’s Response to the HCCH Draft Text of a Future Convention on Parallel Proceedings and Related Actions July 15, 2026
  • Private International Law Dimensions of Singapore’s New Legislation to Combat Online Harms July 14, 2026
  • The 1961 HCCH Apostille Convention: Why All African Countries Should Ratify It? — Insights from Judicial Practice in Africa July 14, 2026
  • The enforcement of an advance on costs for substitute performance at the expense of a Russian debtor in German-French legal relations July 2, 2026
  • “Yes, in principle, but not quite there yet…” – Some Observations on the Public Consultation on the HCCH Draft Text of a Future Convention on Parallel Proceedings and Related Actions June 29, 2026
  • Judgment Mobility Rules in India’s Private International Law Regime: No place for a revision au fond? June 26, 2026
  • Nothing to See Here: The CJEU’s Decision in Case C-232/25 Idzinski June 18, 2026
  • Refusal to Enforce in Egypt of a Californian (U.S.) Judgment for Lack of Reciprocity: What Has Gotten into the Egyptian Supreme Court? June 15, 2026
  • PRC Double Interest neither Double nor Penal: Australian Courts Clear Its Name When Enforcing Chinese Judgments June 10, 2026
  • The AIFC Court, Gazprom v Naftogaz and the Emergence of a New Conduit Jurisdiction Debate June 6, 2026
  • Montana Supreme Court Decides International Child Custody Case June 3, 2026
  • China’s Countering Improper Foreign Extraterritorial Jurisdiction Regulation Blocked EU’s Extraterritorial Data Acquisition May 29, 2026
Link to: Research Handbook on EU Private International Law Link to: Research Handbook on EU Private International Law Research Handbook on EU Private International Law Link to: La Ley Unión Europea, May 2015 Link to: La Ley Unión Europea, May 2015 La Ley Unión Europea, May 2015
Scroll to top Scroll to top Scroll to top