Preliminary question Dutch Court on Art. 45 Brussels Regulation
In a case concerning the enforcement of a Belgian judgment in the Netherlands, between Prism Investments BV v. J.A. van der Meer qq Arilco Holland BV, the Dutch Supreme Court (
About Xandra Kramer
This author has not written his bio yet.
But we are proud to say that Xandra Kramer contributed 201 entries already.
Entries by Xandra Kramer
Conference ´Civil Litigation in a Globalizing World´
/in /by Xandra KramerOn 17 and 18 June 2010, the Schools of Law of Erasmus University Rotterdam and the University of Maastricht (the Netherlands) will jointly organize a conference devoted to the subject “Civil Litigation in a Globalizing World; a Multidisciplinary Perspective”. Globalization of legal traffic and the inherent necessity of having to litigate in foreign courts or […]
Conference on Party Autonomy in Property Law
/in /by Xandra KramerOn 27 and 28 May 2010 a conference on Party Autonomy in Property Law, organized by Erasmus School of Law and Leiden University, will be held at the Erasmus University Rotterdam, the Netherlands. In international trade practice, the question often arises as to whether party autonomy or, more specifically, a choice of law possibility in […]
Netherlands Proposal on Private International Law (“Book 10”)
/in /by Xandra KramerA Dutch Proposal on Private International Law, to be included as Book 10 of the Civil Code of the Netherlands, has been put before Parliament (
Publication: International Jurisdiction and Commercial Litigation.
/in /by Xandra KramerInternational Jurisdiction and Commercial Litigation. Uniform Rules for Contract Disputes, by Hélène van Lith, T.M.C. Asser Press (distributed by Cambridge University Press), 2009. This interesting book includes a comprehensive analysis of the basic approaches to international jurisdiction in commercial contracts, and compares the jurisdictional systems of major continental European countries, the UK, the US and the […]
Special Issue Rome II Nederlands Internationaal Privaatrecht
/in /by Xandra KramerThe latest issue of the Dutch PIL journal Nederlands Internationaal Privaatrecht (2008, no. 4 – published in December) is dedicated to the Rome II Regulation. It includes the following eleven contributions: M. Wilderspin, The Rome II Regulation; Some policy observations, p. 408-413 Xandra Kramer,
ERA Conference: Cross-Border insolvency proceedings
/in /by Xandra KramerOn 26-27 March 2009 a conference on
Enforcement in Netherlands of German ex parte decision under Brussels Regulation
/1 Comment/in /by Xandra KramerIn a case between Realchemie Nederland BV (The Netherlands) and Fa. Feinchemie Schwebda GmbH (Germany) the Dutch Supreme Court ruled that a German “Kostenfestsetzungsbeschluss” (decision on the costs of the procedure), based on an “einstweilige Verfügung” (provisional measure) was to be recognized and enforced pursuant to the Brussels Regulation (
Ruling Dutch Supreme Court on Article 4 Rome Convention
/in /by Xandra KramerOn 17 October 2008, the Dutch Supreme Court delivered a judgment in the case Baros A.G. (Switzerland) v. Embrica Maritim Hotelschiffe GmbH (Germany), concerning the application of Article 4 of the Rome Convention (Hoge Raad, 17 October 2008, No C07/084HR; LJN: BE7628). In 1998 Baros and Embrica concluded a “Bareboat-Chartervertrag” (rental agreement) concerning a hotel […]
Reference for preliminary ruling on relationship Insolvency Regulation and Brussels I
/in /by Xandra KramerIt has been a while, but this reference for a preliminary ruling is nevertheless worth mentioning. In its judgment of 20 June 2008, the Dutch Supreme Court, in a case between the German company Graphics Graphische Maschinen GmbH and A. van der Schee, acting as liquidator of Holland Binding BV, referred questions to the ECJ […]