German Federal Supreme Court: Adversary Proceedings in the State of Origin necessary for Recognition under Brussels I Regulation
In its decision of 21 December 2006 (
This author has not written his bio yet.
But we are proud to say that Veronika Gaertner contributed 220 entries already.
In its decision of 21 December 2006 (
A recently published and very interesting case note by Jens Adolphsen (Gießen) deals critically with the two recent and much discussed ECJ decisions on patent litigation – "
Yesterday, the Ministers of Justice of the European Union met to discuss the future of judicial cooperation in the fields of family law and the law of succession. Due to an constant increase of international family relationships, the Ministers of Justice agree that further actions have to be taken in these fields of law. Thus, […]
The Federal Council of Germany (Bundesrat) has passed a resolution on the
An interesting article written in English by Roberto Baratta (University of Macerata, Italy) has been published in the latest volume of the German legal journal
The scope of Art. 6 (3) Brussels I (counter-claim) has not been clarified by the ECJ so far. Also the German Federal Supreme Court has left this question explicitly open in a judgment of 7 November 2001 (
A new German doctoral dissertation on European company law has been published. The thesis of Wolf-Georg Ringe (Hamburg),
An article by Giesela Rühl (Hamburg) on the provision concerning consumer contracts in the
The 6th edition of the German standard work on private international law, "