Conflict of Laws
  • About
  • Editorial board
  • Subscription
  • Submission
  • Materials
  • Contact
  • Click to open the search input field Click to open the search input field Search
  • Menu Menu

About Stephen Pitel

Professor, Western University

Entries by Stephen Pitel

Canadian Conflicts Publications

June 3, 2008/in /by Stephen Pitel

During a recent round-up of Canadian publications dealing with the conflict of laws, I have found the following articles which some might find of interest:  – Robert Flannigan, “The Use of Foreign Forms to Circumvent Local Liability Rules” (2007) 44 Alta. L.R. 803-14 – Lily Ng, “Covenant Marriage and the Conflict of Laws” (2007) 44 […]

Trinity College Dublin to Host Conference on Rome II Regulation

June 2, 2008/in /by Stephen Pitel

On June 21, 2008, Trinity College Dublin is hosting a conference on the Rome II regulation on the law applicable to non-contractual obligations.  Full details are available

Developments in the Recognition of Foreign Class Action Judgments

May 8, 2008/in /by Stephen Pitel

With the courts of Canadian provinces willing to take jurisdiction over a “national” class claim, involving a plaintiff class which includes members located in other provinces, and with American courts willing to take jurisdiction over “international” classes, involving a plaintiff class which includes members located in Canada, Canadian courts are increasingly having to confront the […]

Nova Scotia Court of Appeal on Substance-Procedure Distinction

March 2, 2008/1 Comment/in /by Stephen Pitel

In Vogler v. Szendroi (available

Article Challenges Canadian Approach to Jurisdiction

January 16, 2008/in /by Stephen Pitel

Professor Tanya Monestier of Queen’s University has published an article challenging the approach in some of the leading cases, including Muscutt v. Courcelles, to the taking of jurisdiction over defendants outside the forum: see Tanya J. Monestier, “A ‘Real and Substantial’ Mess: The Law of Jurisdiction in Canada” (2007) 33 Queen’s L.J. 179 (available to […]

Some Political Drama in the Conflict of Laws in Canada

December 21, 2007/in /by Stephen Pitel

The most recent chapter in the long-running and highly public dispute between businessman Karlheinz Schreiber and former Prime Minister of Canada Brian Mulroney involves significant conflict of laws issues.  On December 20, 2007, Justice Cullity of the Ontario Superior Court of Justice released his decision holding that Schreiber’s claim was dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.  […]

Supreme Court of Canada to Hear Forum Non Conveniens Appeal

November 30, 2007/3 Comments/in /by Stephen Pitel

The Supreme Court of Canada has just granted leave to appeal in Teck Cominco Metals Ltd. v. Lombard General Insurance Company of Canada (also indexed as Lloyd’s Underwriters v. Cominco Ltd.), a decision of the British Columbia Court of Appeal (available

Jurisdiction and Class Actions

October 29, 2007/in /by Stephen Pitel

To what extent should a country’s traditional rules for taking jurisdiction be modified to address some of the unique elements of class actions?  This issue was recently considered by the Manitoba Court of Appeal in Ward v. Canada (Attorney General) (available

Alberta Court Analyzes Public Policy Defence

October 17, 2007/in /by Stephen Pitel

In Bad Ass Coffee Company of Hawaii Inc. v. Bad Ass Enterprises Inc., [2007] A.J. No. 1080 (Q.B.) (QL), available

Forum Non Conveniens and Jurisdiction Clauses in Ontario

September 13, 2007/1 Comment/in /by Stephen Pitel

The Court of Appeal for Ontario has released Red Seal Tours Inc. v. Occidental Hotels Management B.V. (available

Page 10 of 12«‹89101112›»

Categories

  • Views
  • News

Most Recent Posts

  • Private International Law and European Society August 4, 2026
  • The New Zealand Supreme Court’s judgment in Kea Investments Ltd v Wikeley on anti-enforcement relief August 3, 2026
  • Beyond Domicile: The BHP Litigation and the Functional Interconnection of Public and Private International Law August 3, 2026
  • Conflicts of jurisdiction in Senegal: lesson from the Senegalese Supreme Court on Lis Pendens and the Exequatur of foreign judgments July 27, 2026
  • Adoption in the proposal for a European Parenthood Regulation July 21, 2026
  • Copyright, Targeting and Geo-Blocking: The CJEU Stirs the Pot July 15, 2026
  • A Follow-Up: The German Judges Association’s Response to the HCCH Draft Text of a Future Convention on Parallel Proceedings and Related Actions July 15, 2026
  • Private International Law Dimensions of Singapore’s New Legislation to Combat Online Harms July 14, 2026
  • The 1961 HCCH Apostille Convention: Why All African Countries Should Ratify It? — Insights from Judicial Practice in Africa July 14, 2026
  • The enforcement of an advance on costs for substitute performance at the expense of a Russian debtor in German-French legal relations July 2, 2026
  • “Yes, in principle, but not quite there yet…” – Some Observations on the Public Consultation on the HCCH Draft Text of a Future Convention on Parallel Proceedings and Related Actions June 29, 2026
  • Judgment Mobility Rules in India’s Private International Law Regime: No place for a revision au fond? June 26, 2026
  • Nothing to See Here: The CJEU’s Decision in Case C-232/25 Idzinski June 18, 2026
  • Refusal to Enforce in Egypt of a Californian (U.S.) Judgment for Lack of Reciprocity: What Has Gotten into the Egyptian Supreme Court? June 15, 2026
  • PRC Double Interest neither Double nor Penal: Australian Courts Clear Its Name When Enforcing Chinese Judgments June 10, 2026
Scroll to top Scroll to top Scroll to top