Conflict of Laws
  • About
  • Editorial board
  • Subscription
  • Submission
  • Materials
  • Contact
  • Click to open the search input field Click to open the search input field Search
  • Menu Menu

About Stephen Pitel

Professor, Western University

Entries by Stephen Pitel

Court of Appeal for Ontario Rejects “Fourth Defence” to Enforcement of Foreign Judgments

June 15, 2010/in /by Stephen Pitel

The long-running litigation between the United States and a group of defendants who operated a cross-border telemarketing business selling Canadian and foreign lottery tickets to Americans has reached another mile-post with the decision of the Court of Appeal for Ontario in United States of America v. Yemec, 2010 ONCA 414 (available

Canadian Articles on Multijurisdictional Class Actions

June 9, 2010/in /by Stephen Pitel

Three recent articles have been published about multijurisdictional class actions in Canada.  One of the most critical issues is whether the courts of a province will enforce a class action judgment from another province or another country approving a settlement that purports to bind plaintiffs resident in the province.  I know that similar issues are under consideration […]

Limitation Period for Enforcing Foreign Arbitration Award

June 1, 2010/1 Comment/in /by Stephen Pitel

In Yugraneft Corp. v. Rexx Management Corp., 2010 SCC 19 (available

Two New Books

April 23, 2010/in /by Stephen Pitel

Two new books on private international law have recently been published in Canada. The first is a new textbook: Stephen G.A. Pitel & Nicholas S. Rafferty, Conflict of Laws (Toronto: Irwin Law Inc., 2010).  Though I say it myself, for those in other countries this book should serve as a useful comparative reference to the […]

New Book: Foreign Currency Claims in the Conflict of Laws

April 23, 2010/in /by Stephen Pitel

Hart Publishing has published the second title in its Studies in Private International Law series, Foreign Currency Claims in the Conflict of Laws by Professor Vaughan Black of the Schulich School of Law at Dalhousie University.  More information is available

Reformulating a Real and Substantial Connection

February 16, 2010/1 Comment/in /by Stephen Pitel

In Canada, the test for taking jurisdiction over an out-of-province defendant requires that there be “a real and substantial connection” between the dispute and the forum.  In 2002 the Court of Appeal for Ontario created a framework for analyzing a real and substantial connection, setting out, in Muscutt v. Courcelles, eight factors to consider.  This […]

Approach to Jurisdiction under the CJPTA

December 28, 2009/in /by Stephen Pitel

The British Columbia Court of Appeal’s decision in Stanway v. Wyeth Pharmaceuticals Inc., 2009 BCCA 592 (available

Eldon Foote’s Domicile on May 17, 2004

November 23, 2009/in /by Stephen Pitel

Those interested in lengthy discussions of the law of domicile might enjoy the Alberta Court of Queen’s Bench’s odyssey undertaken to determine where the late Eldon Foote died domiciled (available

Quebec Court Stays Palestinian Claim Against West Bank Builders

September 27, 2009/in /by Stephen Pitel

Things have certainly been quiet on the Canadian front over the past few months.  Ending the lull, in a decision filled with different conflict of laws issues, the Quebec Superior Court held, in Bil’In Village Council and Yassin v. Green Park International Inc. (available

Round-Up of Canadian Conflicts Publications

July 15, 2009/in /by Stephen Pitel

Readers of this web site might find some of the following publications to be of interest.  I have tried to gather togther recent work by Canadian conflicts scholars.  Please post a comment if you are aware of another piece. Vaughan Black & Angela Swan, “Concurrent Judicial Jurisdiction: A Race to the Court House or to […]

Page 8 of 12«‹678910›»

Categories

  • Views
  • News

Most Recent Posts

  • Private International Law and European Society August 4, 2026
  • The New Zealand Supreme Court’s judgment in Kea Investments Ltd v Wikeley on anti-enforcement relief August 3, 2026
  • Beyond Domicile: The BHP Litigation and the Functional Interconnection of Public and Private International Law August 3, 2026
  • Conflicts of jurisdiction in Senegal: lesson from the Senegalese Supreme Court on Lis Pendens and the Exequatur of foreign judgments July 27, 2026
  • Adoption in the proposal for a European Parenthood Regulation July 21, 2026
  • Copyright, Targeting and Geo-Blocking: The CJEU Stirs the Pot July 15, 2026
  • A Follow-Up: The German Judges Association’s Response to the HCCH Draft Text of a Future Convention on Parallel Proceedings and Related Actions July 15, 2026
  • Private International Law Dimensions of Singapore’s New Legislation to Combat Online Harms July 14, 2026
  • The 1961 HCCH Apostille Convention: Why All African Countries Should Ratify It? — Insights from Judicial Practice in Africa July 14, 2026
  • The enforcement of an advance on costs for substitute performance at the expense of a Russian debtor in German-French legal relations July 2, 2026
  • “Yes, in principle, but not quite there yet…” – Some Observations on the Public Consultation on the HCCH Draft Text of a Future Convention on Parallel Proceedings and Related Actions June 29, 2026
  • Judgment Mobility Rules in India’s Private International Law Regime: No place for a revision au fond? June 26, 2026
  • Nothing to See Here: The CJEU’s Decision in Case C-232/25 Idzinski June 18, 2026
  • Refusal to Enforce in Egypt of a Californian (U.S.) Judgment for Lack of Reciprocity: What Has Gotten into the Egyptian Supreme Court? June 15, 2026
  • PRC Double Interest neither Double nor Penal: Australian Courts Clear Its Name When Enforcing Chinese Judgments June 10, 2026
Scroll to top Scroll to top Scroll to top