Entries by Stephen Pitel

Canadian Conflicts Publications

During a recent round-up of Canadian publications dealing with the conflict of laws, I have found the following articles which some might find of interest:  – Robert Flannigan, “The Use of Foreign Forms to Circumvent Local Liability Rules” (2007) 44 Alta. L.R. 803-14 – Lily Ng, “Covenant Marriage and the Conflict of Laws” (2007) 44 […]

Developments in the Recognition of Foreign Class Action Judgments

With the courts of Canadian provinces willing to take jurisdiction over a “national” class claim, involving a plaintiff class which includes members located in other provinces, and with American courts willing to take jurisdiction over “international” classes, involving a plaintiff class which includes members located in Canada, Canadian courts are increasingly having to confront the […]

Article Challenges Canadian Approach to Jurisdiction

Professor Tanya Monestier of Queen’s University has published an article challenging the approach in some of the leading cases, including Muscutt v. Courcelles, to the taking of jurisdiction over defendants outside the forum: see Tanya J. Monestier, “A ‘Real and Substantial’ Mess: The Law of Jurisdiction in Canada” (2007) 33 Queen’s L.J. 179 (available to […]

Some Political Drama in the Conflict of Laws in Canada

The most recent chapter in the long-running and highly public dispute between businessman Karlheinz Schreiber and former Prime Minister of Canada Brian Mulroney involves significant conflict of laws issues.  On December 20, 2007, Justice Cullity of the Ontario Superior Court of Justice released his decision holding that Schreiber’s claim was dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.  […]

Jurisdiction and Class Actions

To what extent should a country’s traditional rules for taking jurisdiction be modified to address some of the unique elements of class actions?  This issue was recently considered by the Manitoba Court of Appeal in Ward v. Canada (Attorney General) (available