Conflict of Laws
  • About
  • Editorial board
  • Subscription
  • Submission
  • Materials
  • Contact
  • Click to open the search input field Click to open the search input field Search
  • Menu Menu

About Jan Neels

This author has not written his bio yet.
But we are proud to say that Jan Neels contributed 20 entries already.

Entries by Jan Neels

New publication on Israeli PIL

April 20, 2009/in /by Jan Neels

Private International Law in Israel by Prof Talia Einhorn Visiting Professor of Law / Indiana University School of Law Visiting Senior Research Fellow / Tel-Aviv University Faculty of Management Kluwer Law International 2009 396 pages ISBN: 9041128670 ISBN-13: 9789041128676 Israel’s PIL is not codified, nor is it clearly traceable to any one legal system. Since […]

PIL conference at the University of Johannesburg

April 2, 2009/3 Comments/in /by Jan Neels

Comparative private international law conference; University of Johannesburg; 8-11 September 2009 Key-note speakers: (1) Prof Dr C F Forsyth (University of Cambridge): Reconciling classic private international law with fidelity to constitutional values (2) Prof Dr M Martinek (University of Saarland): The Rome I and Rome II regulations in European private international law – a critical […]

PIL conference in Johannesburg

February 18, 2009/in /by Jan Neels

PIL conference at the University of Johannesburg 9-11 September 2009 Call for papers: www.uj.ac.za/law Closing date: 28 February 2009

PIL conference in Johannesburg

January 21, 2009/in /by Jan Neels

Please find a call for papers for the third quadrennial international conference on comparative private international law to be held at the University of Johannesburg in South Africa (9-11 September 2009) on

New Publication: Kruger on EU Jurisdiction Rules and Third States

November 5, 2008/1 Comment/in /by Jan Neels

T. Kruger, Civil Jurisdiction rules of the EU and their impact on third States, Oxford University Press, 2008, 442p. This new publication by the South African author Dr Thalia Kruger examines the civil jurisdiction rules of the EU, contained in Council Regulations 44/2001 (Brussels I), 2201/2003 (Brussels IIbis), and 1346/2000 (Insolvency Regulation) through the lens […]

Eighteen Publications on South African Private International Law 2007-2008

September 19, 2008/in /by Jan Neels

Sieg Eiselen “Goodbye arrest ad fundandam. Hello forum non conveniens?” 2008 Tydskrif vir die Suid-Afrikaanse Reg / Journal of South African Law 794 Thalia Kruger Civil Jurisdiction Rules of the EU and their Impact on Third States Oxford University Press 2008 Thalia Kruger “Regional organisations and their dispute settlement bodies” 2008 De Jure (to be […]

Seminar on PIL at the University of Johannesburg

April 4, 2008/in /by Jan Neels

FACULTY OF LAW, UNIVERSITY OF JOHANNESBURG – INSTITUTE FOR PRIVATE INTERNATIONAL LAW IN AFRICA Morning seminar on private international law Thursday 17 April 2008 An African private international law regime (?) – conclusions and lessons from a decade of case law in thirteen African countries Mr R F Oppong (Lancaster University)

Hague Conference on PIL signs agreement with UJ

September 10, 2007/in /by Jan Neels

A cooperation agreement between the Hague Conference on Private International Law and the Institute for Private International Law in Africa, Faculty of Law, University of Johannesburg, came into effect on 28 August 2007. In terms of the agreement the Johannesburg Institute will act as information centre for the Hague Conference and promote the work of […]

Characterisation and liberative prescription/limitation in South Africa

August 7, 2007/in /by Jan Neels

South African academics welcome the outcome of the decision of the Supreme Court of Appeal in Society of Lloyd’s v Price; Society of Lloyd’s v Lee 2006 5 SA 393 (SCA) (which may be downloaded from

Physical Presence of Defendant As a Ground For International Jurisdiction – Decision of the South African Supreme Court of Appeal

July 24, 2007/in /by Jan Neels

In a recent decision, Richman v Ben-Tovim 2007 2 SA 283 (SCA); [2007] 2 All SA 234 (SCA), the Supreme Court of Appeal of South Africa decided that the mere physical presence of the defendant in the foreign jurisdiction at the time process was served is a sufficient basis for international jurisdiction in the context […]

Page 2 of 212

Categories

  • Views
  • News

Most Recent Posts

  • The New Zealand Supreme Court’s judgment in Kea Investments Ltd v Wikeley on anti-enforcement relief August 3, 2026
  • Beyond Domicile: The BHP Litigation and the Functional Interconnection of Public and Private International Law August 3, 2026
  • Conflicts of jurisdiction in Senegal: lesson from the Senegalese Supreme Court on Lis Pendens and the Exequatur of foreign judgments July 27, 2026
  • Adoption in the proposal for a European Parenthood Regulation July 21, 2026
  • Copyright, Targeting and Geo-Blocking: The CJEU Stirs the Pot July 15, 2026
  • A Follow-Up: The German Judges Association’s Response to the HCCH Draft Text of a Future Convention on Parallel Proceedings and Related Actions July 15, 2026
  • Private International Law Dimensions of Singapore’s New Legislation to Combat Online Harms July 14, 2026
  • The 1961 HCCH Apostille Convention: Why All African Countries Should Ratify It? — Insights from Judicial Practice in Africa July 14, 2026
  • The enforcement of an advance on costs for substitute performance at the expense of a Russian debtor in German-French legal relations July 2, 2026
  • “Yes, in principle, but not quite there yet…” – Some Observations on the Public Consultation on the HCCH Draft Text of a Future Convention on Parallel Proceedings and Related Actions June 29, 2026
  • Judgment Mobility Rules in India’s Private International Law Regime: No place for a revision au fond? June 26, 2026
  • Nothing to See Here: The CJEU’s Decision in Case C-232/25 Idzinski June 18, 2026
  • Refusal to Enforce in Egypt of a Californian (U.S.) Judgment for Lack of Reciprocity: What Has Gotten into the Egyptian Supreme Court? June 15, 2026
  • PRC Double Interest neither Double nor Penal: Australian Courts Clear Its Name When Enforcing Chinese Judgments June 10, 2026
  • The AIFC Court, Gazprom v Naftogaz and the Emergence of a New Conduit Jurisdiction Debate June 6, 2026
Scroll to top Scroll to top Scroll to top