Conflict of Laws
  • About
  • Editorial board
  • Subscription
  • Submission
  • Materials
  • Contact
  • Click to open the search input field Click to open the search input field Search
  • Menu Menu

PIL conference at the University of Johannesburg

April 2, 2009/3 Comments/in /by Jan Neels
image_pdfimage_print

Comparative private international law conference; University of Johannesburg; 8-11 September 2009

Key-note speakers:
(1) Prof Dr C F Forsyth (University of Cambridge):
Reconciling classic private international law with fidelity to constitutional values

(2) Prof Dr M Martinek (University of Saarland):
The Rome I and Rome II regulations in European private international law –
a critical analysis

34 participants from 17 countries:

Cameroon (1); Canada (1); China (4); Croatia (1); Czech Republic (1); Germany (2); Israel (1); Italy (1); Japan (1); Mauritius (1); the Netherlands (2); Poland (1); Portugal (1); South Africa (7); Spain (4); United Kingdom (4); United States of America (1)

Sections on:

Private international law of obligations
Private international family law
Commercial private international law
Procedural private international law
Arbitration and private international law
Miscellaneous topics of private international law

Further information: http://www.uj.ac.za/law. Conference organiser: Prof Jan L Neels (jlneels@uj.ac.za). The provisional programme will be available shortly.

Share this entry
  • Share on Facebook
  • Share on X
  • Share on WhatsApp
  • Share on Pinterest
  • Share on LinkedIn
  • Share on Tumblr
  • Share on Vk
  • Share on Reddit
  • Share by Mail
https://conflictoflaws.net/News/2020/08/CoL_Banner-1.png 0 0 Jan Neels https://conflictoflaws.net/News/2020/08/CoL_Banner-1.png Jan Neels2009-04-02 20:58:352009-04-05 18:43:59PIL conference at the University of Johannesburg
3 replies
  1. Kalman Richter says:
    April 3, 2009 at 3:40 pm

    Good day,

    1. Please send me further details on the conference.
    2. Can papers still be submitted? Unfortunately I have only now learnt about the event.

    regards

    K. Richter

  2. Martin George says:
    April 4, 2009 at 12:17 pm

    Kalman,

    To be sure that your message reaches him, send an email directly to Jan Neels, at the address given above.

  3. Jan Neels says:
    April 6, 2009 at 8:13 am

    jlneels@uj.ac.za

Comments are closed.

Categories

  • Views
  • News

Most Recent Posts

  • Private International Law and European Society August 4, 2026
  • The New Zealand Supreme Court’s judgment in Kea Investments Ltd v Wikeley on anti-enforcement relief August 3, 2026
  • Beyond Domicile: The BHP Litigation and the Functional Interconnection of Public and Private International Law August 3, 2026
  • Conflicts of jurisdiction in Senegal: lesson from the Senegalese Supreme Court on Lis Pendens and the Exequatur of foreign judgments July 27, 2026
  • Adoption in the proposal for a European Parenthood Regulation July 21, 2026
  • Copyright, Targeting and Geo-Blocking: The CJEU Stirs the Pot July 15, 2026
  • A Follow-Up: The German Judges Association’s Response to the HCCH Draft Text of a Future Convention on Parallel Proceedings and Related Actions July 15, 2026
  • Private International Law Dimensions of Singapore’s New Legislation to Combat Online Harms July 14, 2026
  • The 1961 HCCH Apostille Convention: Why All African Countries Should Ratify It? — Insights from Judicial Practice in Africa July 14, 2026
  • The enforcement of an advance on costs for substitute performance at the expense of a Russian debtor in German-French legal relations July 2, 2026
  • “Yes, in principle, but not quite there yet…” – Some Observations on the Public Consultation on the HCCH Draft Text of a Future Convention on Parallel Proceedings and Related Actions June 29, 2026
  • Judgment Mobility Rules in India’s Private International Law Regime: No place for a revision au fond? June 26, 2026
  • Nothing to See Here: The CJEU’s Decision in Case C-232/25 Idzinski June 18, 2026
  • Refusal to Enforce in Egypt of a Californian (U.S.) Judgment for Lack of Reciprocity: What Has Gotten into the Egyptian Supreme Court? June 15, 2026
  • PRC Double Interest neither Double nor Penal: Australian Courts Clear Its Name When Enforcing Chinese Judgments June 10, 2026
Link to: Forum Non Conveniens and Treaty Rights: King v. Cessna Link to: Forum Non Conveniens and Treaty Rights: King v. Cessna Forum Non Conveniens and Treaty Rights: King v. Cessna Link to: Canadian National Class Action Judgment Not Recognized in Quebec Link to: Canadian National Class Action Judgment Not Recognized in Quebec Canadian National Class Action Judgment Not Recognized in Quebec
Scroll to top Scroll to top Scroll to top