Conflict of Laws
  • About
  • Editorial board
  • Subscription
  • Submission
  • Materials
  • Contact
  • Click to open the search input field Click to open the search input field Search
  • Menu Menu

Private and Public International Law

January 30, 2021/2 Comments/in News/by Ralf Michaels
image_pdfimage_print

My PIL friends vs me. pic.twitter.com/7PSs1s5LDp

— Michiel Poesen (@Poesen_m) January 29, 2021

Michiel Poesen appropriated a currently popular meme and went (almost) viral. Is his observation right? Comments very welcome.

 

Share this entry
  • Share on Facebook
  • Share on X
  • Share on WhatsApp
  • Share on Pinterest
  • Share on LinkedIn
  • Share on Tumblr
  • Share on Vk
  • Share on Reddit
  • Share by Mail
https://conflictoflaws.net/News/2020/08/CoL_Banner-1.png 0 0 Ralf Michaels https://conflictoflaws.net/News/2020/08/CoL_Banner-1.png Ralf Michaels2021-01-30 22:50:012021-01-31 22:10:29Private and Public International Law
2 replies
  1. Mayela Celis says:
    January 31, 2021 at 1:37 pm

    It depends on who you ask. I find EU private international law absolutely extravagant! Just take a look at the Brussels II ter Regulation.

  2. Anon1bis says:
    January 31, 2021 at 5:29 pm

    It also depends on how one sees the gentleman in pink: For some, he is simply fabulous; for others ridiculously pretentious. Public international lawyers on Twitter seems to gladly accept for themselves the first interpretation. Actually, it’s funny that they do not even consider a second interpretation exists. Oh, well….
    For the rest, “Give this man (Michiel Posen) a cookie!”.

Comments are closed.

Categories

  • Views
  • News

Most Recent Posts

  • The Philippines: Recognition of Foreign Divorces and Recent Amendments to the Rules of Court October 21, 2026
  • Mozambican Supreme Court Recognises an Indian Adoption: A Teleological Approach to the Recognition of Foreign Acts October 19, 2026
  • Egyptian Supreme Court Enforces Italian Judgment: The Right Outcome despite Some Reservations October 14, 2026
  • Talaq Divorce Cases in the United States October 7, 2026
  • Book Review: Choice of Forum Clauses in Asia (Lemuel L Lopez) October 5, 2026
  • Zamzam on Egyptian Private International Law (in Arabic): Towards Reviving the Golden Age of Egyptian Private International Law October 2, 2026
  • Maintenance Duties for a Gestational Surrogate Following Non-Recognition – An Unreported Spanish Judgment September 22, 2026
  • From Symbolism to Substance: Comity and Judicial Reform in South Africa’s Foreign Judgments Regime September 15, 2026
  • Persistent and Reasonable Efforts in the Field of Cross-Border Service of Documents. Continuation or Stay of Proceedings? September 12, 2026
  • Speaking for the Dead: Idziski and the Forum for Post-Mortem Likeness Claims September 7, 2026
  • Book Review: Andrew Dickinson and Alexander Thompson, The State Immunity Act 1978 (OUP, 2025) September 7, 2026
  • Political Immobilisation of Iranian Diaspora Property: Lex Situs, Human Rights and Public Policy August 22, 2026
  • The Demise of the Lex Domicilii Matrimonii in South African Private International Law August 18, 2026
  • Support in cross-border transactions by Adults: Contract law vs capacity law August 12, 2026
  • Recognition of Italian Extrajudicial Divorces in Tunisia — Between Methodological Uncertainty and the Need to Preserve Continuity of Personal Status Across Borders August 9, 2026
Link to: Can China’s New “Blocking Statute” Combat Foreign Sanctions? Link to: Can China’s New “Blocking Statute” Combat Foreign Sanctions? Can China’s New “Blocking Statute” Combat Foreign Sanctions? Link to: Milan Investment Arbitration Week: 15-20 February 2021 Link to: Milan Investment Arbitration Week: 15-20 February 2021 Milan Investment Arbitration Week: 15-20 February 2021
Scroll to top Scroll to top Scroll to top