Conflict of Laws
  • About
  • Editorial board
  • Subscription
  • Submission
  • Materials
  • Contact
  • Click to open the search input field Click to open the search input field Search
  • Menu Menu

Suing the Pope?

April 5, 2010/6 Comments/in /by Gilles Cuniberti
image_pdfimage_print

Can the Pope be sued? Does he enjoy an immunity? As a head of state? But is the Holy See a State?

It seems that it is seriously envisaged to initiate proceedings in England against him for allegedly covering up sexual abuses by priests.

See this post of Julian Ku at opiniojuris, and more specifically the comments. See also the update here.

Share this entry
  • Share on Facebook
  • Share on X
  • Share on WhatsApp
  • Share on Pinterest
  • Share on LinkedIn
  • Share on Tumblr
  • Share on Vk
  • Share on Reddit
  • Share by Mail
https://conflictoflaws.net/News/2020/08/CoL_Banner-1.png 0 0 Gilles Cuniberti https://conflictoflaws.net/News/2020/08/CoL_Banner-1.png Gilles Cuniberti2010-04-05 07:29:342010-04-05 07:43:52Suing the Pope?
6 replies
  1. Lucas Velozo de Melo Bento says:
    April 20, 2010 at 6:07 am

    These are all very interesting questions. More fundamentally, can one sue the Catholic Church for reparations of crimes committed in the past (or conspiracy to commit such crimes)?

  2. Gilles Cuniberti says:
    April 20, 2010 at 6:11 am

    Lucas,

    I am not sure I understand your more fundamental question, but it seems to me that you always seek compensation for actions committed in the past, as you can only be compensated for a loss (already) suffered.

  3. Gilles Cuniberti says:
    April 20, 2010 at 6:12 am

    An update on this story can be found here.

  4. Lucas Velozo de Melo Bento says:
    April 20, 2010 at 6:43 am

    Gilles,

    Yes, perhaps my comment over emphasized the fact that one can only seek compensation for a loss already suffered! My reference to the past was however to acts committed centuries ago. I should have been clearer.

    Forgive my nescience on the matter in hand, but I would be extremely grateful if you could provide your views on the following questions:

    -Can the Catholic Church be sued for crimes / torts committed centuries ago (perhaps under public international law)?
    – Can the Church be sued at all? If not, could a party sue a Church leader as an alternative? (which brings us to your comment on immunity)

  5. Gilles Cuniberti says:
    April 20, 2010 at 7:10 am

    Whether the Church can be sued for acts committed a long time ago will be a matter for the local criminal law to decide. It is likely that, in most jurisdictions, crimes committed many years ago will be time-barred. But, in some jurisdictions, the most egregious crimes can never become so, and I would not be surprised that rape committed on children could fall within this category somewhere. Also, it might be that, under some criminal laws, the fact that the victims passed away would be relevant and a bar for prosecution, and I suspect that the victims of crimes committed centuries ago have passed away.

    As to whether the Church or its leaders enjoy a sovereign immunity, it will again vary from one jurisdiction to another. The basics of the discussion can be found at opiniojuris.

  6. Lucas Velozo de Melo Bento says:
    April 20, 2010 at 7:19 am

    Thank you very much for your insight.

Comments are closed.

Categories

  • Views
  • News

Most Recent Posts

  • The New Zealand Supreme Court’s judgment in Kea Investments Ltd v Wikeley on anti-enforcement relief August 3, 2026
  • Beyond Domicile: The BHP Litigation and the Functional Interconnection of Public and Private International Law August 3, 2026
  • Conflicts of jurisdiction in Senegal: lesson from the Senegalese Supreme Court on Lis Pendens and the Exequatur of foreign judgments July 27, 2026
  • Adoption in the proposal for a European Parenthood Regulation July 21, 2026
  • Copyright, Targeting and Geo-Blocking: The CJEU Stirs the Pot July 15, 2026
  • A Follow-Up: The German Judges Association’s Response to the HCCH Draft Text of a Future Convention on Parallel Proceedings and Related Actions July 15, 2026
  • Private International Law Dimensions of Singapore’s New Legislation to Combat Online Harms July 14, 2026
  • The 1961 HCCH Apostille Convention: Why All African Countries Should Ratify It? — Insights from Judicial Practice in Africa July 14, 2026
  • The enforcement of an advance on costs for substitute performance at the expense of a Russian debtor in German-French legal relations July 2, 2026
  • “Yes, in principle, but not quite there yet…” – Some Observations on the Public Consultation on the HCCH Draft Text of a Future Convention on Parallel Proceedings and Related Actions June 29, 2026
  • Judgment Mobility Rules in India’s Private International Law Regime: No place for a revision au fond? June 26, 2026
  • Nothing to See Here: The CJEU’s Decision in Case C-232/25 Idzinski June 18, 2026
  • Refusal to Enforce in Egypt of a Californian (U.S.) Judgment for Lack of Reciprocity: What Has Gotten into the Egyptian Supreme Court? June 15, 2026
  • PRC Double Interest neither Double nor Penal: Australian Courts Clear Its Name When Enforcing Chinese Judgments June 10, 2026
  • The AIFC Court, Gazprom v Naftogaz and the Emergence of a New Conduit Jurisdiction Debate June 6, 2026
Link to: Switzerland to Apply Lugano Convention in 2011 Link to: Switzerland to Apply Lugano Convention in 2011 Switzerland to Apply Lugano Convention in 2011 Link to: Journal of Private International Law, 2010, Vol 6(1) Link to: Journal of Private International Law, 2010, Vol 6(1) Journal of Private International Law, 2010, Vol 6(1)
Scroll to top Scroll to top Scroll to top