Conflict of Laws
  • About
  • Editorial board
  • Subscription
  • Submission
  • Materials
  • Contact
  • Click to open the search input field Click to open the search input field Search
  • Menu Menu

Journal of Private International Law, 2010, Vol 6(1)

April 7, 2010/in /by Martin George
image_pdfimage_print

The April 2010 (Vol 6, Number 1) issue of the Journal of Private International Law is now out, and contains the following articles (links to abstracts on IngentaConnect included):

  • Cross-Border Assignments under Rome I (Verhagen, Hendrik L.E.; van Dongen, Sanne)
  • Choice of Law in International Contracts in Latin American Legal Systems (Albornoz, María Mercedes)
  • The Problem of International Transactions: Conflict of Laws Revisited (Rühl, Giesela)
  • The Rome II Regulation and Traffic Accidents: Uniform Conflict Rules with Some Room for Forum Shopping – How So? (Nagy, Csongor István)
  • Interregional Recognition and Enforcement of Civil and Commercial Judgments: Lessons for China from US and EU Laws (Huang, Jie)
  • The Constitutionalisation of Party Autonomy in European Family Law (Yetano, Toni Marzal)
  • The Insolubility of Renvoi and its Consequences (Hughes, David Alexander)
  • Private International Law in Consumer Contracts: A European Perspective (Tang, Zheng Sophia)

Subscription information for J Priv Int L is here.

Share this entry
  • Share on Facebook
  • Share on X
  • Share on WhatsApp
  • Share on Pinterest
  • Share on LinkedIn
  • Share on Tumblr
  • Share on Vk
  • Share on Reddit
  • Share by Mail
https://conflictoflaws.net/News/2020/08/CoL_Banner-1.png 0 0 Martin George https://conflictoflaws.net/News/2020/08/CoL_Banner-1.png Martin George2010-04-07 13:33:092010-04-07 13:33:09Journal of Private International Law, 2010, Vol 6(1)

Categories

  • Views
  • News

Most Recent Posts

  • Private International Law and European Society August 4, 2026
  • The New Zealand Supreme Court’s judgment in Kea Investments Ltd v Wikeley on anti-enforcement relief August 3, 2026
  • Beyond Domicile: The BHP Litigation and the Functional Interconnection of Public and Private International Law August 3, 2026
  • Conflicts of jurisdiction in Senegal: lesson from the Senegalese Supreme Court on Lis Pendens and the Exequatur of foreign judgments July 27, 2026
  • Adoption in the proposal for a European Parenthood Regulation July 21, 2026
  • Copyright, Targeting and Geo-Blocking: The CJEU Stirs the Pot July 15, 2026
  • A Follow-Up: The German Judges Association’s Response to the HCCH Draft Text of a Future Convention on Parallel Proceedings and Related Actions July 15, 2026
  • Private International Law Dimensions of Singapore’s New Legislation to Combat Online Harms July 14, 2026
  • The 1961 HCCH Apostille Convention: Why All African Countries Should Ratify It? — Insights from Judicial Practice in Africa July 14, 2026
  • The enforcement of an advance on costs for substitute performance at the expense of a Russian debtor in German-French legal relations July 2, 2026
  • “Yes, in principle, but not quite there yet…” – Some Observations on the Public Consultation on the HCCH Draft Text of a Future Convention on Parallel Proceedings and Related Actions June 29, 2026
  • Judgment Mobility Rules in India’s Private International Law Regime: No place for a revision au fond? June 26, 2026
  • Nothing to See Here: The CJEU’s Decision in Case C-232/25 Idzinski June 18, 2026
  • Refusal to Enforce in Egypt of a Californian (U.S.) Judgment for Lack of Reciprocity: What Has Gotten into the Egyptian Supreme Court? June 15, 2026
  • PRC Double Interest neither Double nor Penal: Australian Courts Clear Its Name When Enforcing Chinese Judgments June 10, 2026
Link to: Suing the Pope? Link to: Suing the Pope? Suing the Pope? Link to: Trans-Tasman Proceedings Law Reform Link to: Trans-Tasman Proceedings Law Reform Trans-Tasman Proceedings Law Reform
Scroll to top Scroll to top Scroll to top