Conflict of Laws
  • About
  • Editorial board
  • Subscription
  • Submission
  • Materials
  • Contact
  • Click to open the search input field Click to open the search input field Search
  • Menu Menu

European Commission: Area of Freedom, Security and Justice serving the Citizen

July 12, 2009/1 Comment/in /by Veronika Gaertner
image_pdfimage_print

The communication from the Commission to the European Parliament and the Council titled “An area of freedom, security and justice serving the citizen” (COM(2009) 262 final) mentioned already in one of our previous posts, is now available.

Of particular interest might be the following passages envisaging a communitarisation of choice of law rules in the field of company law:

The regulation of business law would help oil the wheels of the internal market. A variety of measures could be considered here: common rules determining the law applicable to matters of company law, insurance contracts and the transfer of claims, and the convergence of
national rules on insolvency procedures for banks. (p. 15)

Further efforts are needed to harmonise rules on the law applicable to insurance contracts and
company law. (p. 31)

Many thanks to Andrew Dickinson and Jan von Hein for the tip-off!

Share this entry
  • Share on Facebook
  • Share on X
  • Share on WhatsApp
  • Share on Pinterest
  • Share on LinkedIn
  • Share on Tumblr
  • Share on Vk
  • Share on Reddit
  • Share by Mail
https://conflictoflaws.net/News/2020/08/CoL_Banner-1.png 0 0 Veronika Gaertner https://conflictoflaws.net/News/2020/08/CoL_Banner-1.png Veronika Gaertner2009-07-12 06:07:342009-07-12 06:07:34European Commission: Area of Freedom, Security and Justice serving the Citizen
1 reply
  1. Andrew Dickinson says:
    December 1, 2009 at 8:12 am

    In an impressive show of transparency (as is to be expected from the Swedish Government, which has long supported those claiming access to documents from Community institutions), up to date drafts of the Stockholm Programme are available on the Presidency website: http://www.se2009.eu/en/meetings_news/2009/10/16/stockholm_programme_made_public.

    In the meeting yesterday of the JHA Council, it appears that significant progress was made towards concluding the final version: http://www.consilium.europa.eu/uedocs/cms_Data/docs/pressdata/en/jha/111601.pdf

Comments are closed.

Categories

  • Views
  • News

Most Recent Posts

  • The New Zealand Supreme Court’s judgment in Kea Investments Ltd v Wikeley on anti-enforcement relief August 3, 2026
  • Beyond Domicile: The BHP Litigation and the Functional Interconnection of Public and Private International Law August 3, 2026
  • Conflicts of jurisdiction in Senegal: lesson from the Senegalese Supreme Court on Lis Pendens and the Exequatur of foreign judgments July 27, 2026
  • Adoption in the proposal for a European Parenthood Regulation July 21, 2026
  • Copyright, Targeting and Geo-Blocking: The CJEU Stirs the Pot July 15, 2026
  • A Follow-Up: The German Judges Association’s Response to the HCCH Draft Text of a Future Convention on Parallel Proceedings and Related Actions July 15, 2026
  • Private International Law Dimensions of Singapore’s New Legislation to Combat Online Harms July 14, 2026
  • The 1961 HCCH Apostille Convention: Why All African Countries Should Ratify It? — Insights from Judicial Practice in Africa July 14, 2026
  • The enforcement of an advance on costs for substitute performance at the expense of a Russian debtor in German-French legal relations July 2, 2026
  • “Yes, in principle, but not quite there yet…” – Some Observations on the Public Consultation on the HCCH Draft Text of a Future Convention on Parallel Proceedings and Related Actions June 29, 2026
  • Judgment Mobility Rules in India’s Private International Law Regime: No place for a revision au fond? June 26, 2026
  • Nothing to See Here: The CJEU’s Decision in Case C-232/25 Idzinski June 18, 2026
  • Refusal to Enforce in Egypt of a Californian (U.S.) Judgment for Lack of Reciprocity: What Has Gotten into the Egyptian Supreme Court? June 15, 2026
  • PRC Double Interest neither Double nor Penal: Australian Courts Clear Its Name When Enforcing Chinese Judgments June 10, 2026
  • The AIFC Court, Gazprom v Naftogaz and the Emergence of a New Conduit Jurisdiction Debate June 6, 2026
Link to: Latest Issue of “Praxis des Internationalen Privat- und Verfahrensrechts” (4/2009) Link to: Latest Issue of “Praxis des Internationalen Privat- und Verfahrensrechts” (4/2009) Latest Issue of “Praxis des Internationalen Privat- und Verfahrensrechts”... Link to: Publication: Hartley on International Commercial Litigation Link to: Publication: Hartley on International Commercial Litigation Publication: Hartley on International Commercial Litigation
Scroll to top Scroll to top Scroll to top