Conflict of Laws
  • About
  • Editorial board
  • Subscription
  • Submission
  • Materials
  • Contact
  • Click to open the search input field Click to open the search input field Search
  • Menu Menu

Commission’s Report and Green Paper on Brussels I Regulation

April 22, 2009/10 Comments/in /by Veronika Gaertner
image_pdfimage_print

Yesterday, on 21 April 2009, the European Commission adopted a report and a green paper on the functioning of the existing rules on jurisdiction of the courts and the recognition and enforcement of foreign judgments (Regulation (EC) No. 44/2001).

The background of the  Commission’s report and green paper is as follows: Art. 73 Brussels I Regulation requires the Commission to evaluate the operation of the Regulation and to present a report on the application of the Regulation which shall be accompanied, if necessary, by proposals for adaptations to the Regulation.

In preparation of the Commission’s report, a study has been carried out on behalf of the Commission by an external contractor – the Institute for Private International Law, University of Heidelberg. While this study shows that the Regulation operates, in principle, well, it reveals some difficulties as well which need to be addressed.

Thus, the Commission addresses in the report and the green paper, as stated in its memo, the following issues:

– The removal of the remaining obstacles to a free circulation of judgments, i.e. the removal of “exequatur”

– The protection of European citizens and companies in case of disputes with parties domiciled in third States, in particular by ensuring equal access to the courts of the Member States and equal protection against judgments given by the courts of third States against European defendants;

– Finally, certain imperfections in the application of certain rules of the Regulation, such as avoiding parallel proceedings in different Member States and ensuring the sound application of contractual agreements as to which courts will deal with the case in the Union

According to the Commission, the report and the green paper aim at launching a broad public consultation on possible ways forward with regard to the mentioned issues. The deadline for consultation is 30 June 2009 (see also here). A proposal for revision of the Regulation is planned for the end of this year.

The Commission’s press release can be found here. The Brussels I report can be found here, and the Green Paper can be found here.

Share this entry
  • Share on Facebook
  • Share on X
  • Share on WhatsApp
  • Share on Pinterest
  • Share on LinkedIn
  • Share on Tumblr
  • Share on Vk
  • Share on Reddit
  • Share by Mail
https://conflictoflaws.net/News/2020/08/CoL_Banner-1.png 0 0 Veronika Gaertner https://conflictoflaws.net/News/2020/08/CoL_Banner-1.png Veronika Gaertner2009-04-22 17:40:042009-04-23 11:24:10Commission’s Report and Green Paper on Brussels I Regulation
10 replies
  1. Dr. Oliver L. Knöfel says:
    April 23, 2009 at 6:40 am

    Where to look for the Report and Green Paper itself? Or has only the EC Memo been published so far?

  2. Michel says:
    April 23, 2009 at 8:28 am

    Oliver, it’s a very good question. I’m also looking for this Report and this Green Paper!

  3. Michel says:
    April 23, 2009 at 9:12 am

    http://www.ipex.eu/ipex/cms/home/lang/en

  4. Martin George says:
    April 23, 2009 at 12:32 pm

    Many thanks, Michel. I’ve added the links to both to Veronika’s post.

  5. Catherine Kessedjian says:
    April 25, 2009 at 11:53 am

    I urgently need the report and the green paper. The links to those documents are blocked. Can anybody send the texts? Thanks

  6. Marie-Elodie Ancel says:
    April 25, 2009 at 12:43 pm

    This is really strange.

    You can download the report and the green paper in French on this website:

    http://www.contentieux-international.net/offres/gestion/actus_358_4254-1/reglement-bruxelles-1-revision-consultation-ouverte.html

    I got them on Thursday following the link given by Michel and selecting French as language.

  7. Axel Buhr says:
    April 25, 2009 at 12:49 pm

    The english version is also available on the danish site of the Commission:
    http://ec.europa.eu/danmark/eu-politik/alle_emner/juridiske/2009/090421_handelsretssagere_da.htm#

    Kind regards,
    Axel Buhr

  8. Catherine Kessedjian says:
    April 25, 2009 at 1:25 pm

    Merci! Thank you! It worked. The European site once more proves to be deficient (or, at least, I cannot find in it what I am looking for)

  9. Ana Gerdau de Borja says:
    June 18, 2009 at 12:08 am

    Would perhaps anyone know where I could get hold of the position papers recently issued by the IBA and by the French Committee on Arbitration concerning the Green Paper? Thank you very much.

  10. Jana says:
    June 19, 2009 at 1:14 pm

    http://www.ibanet.org/LPD/Dispute_Resolution_Section/Arbitration/Projects.aspx#brussels

Comments are closed.

Categories

  • Views
  • News

Most Recent Posts

  • The New Zealand Supreme Court’s judgment in Kea Investments Ltd v Wikeley on anti-enforcement relief August 3, 2026
  • Beyond Domicile: The BHP Litigation and the Functional Interconnection of Public and Private International Law August 3, 2026
  • Conflicts of jurisdiction in Senegal: lesson from the Senegalese Supreme Court on Lis Pendens and the Exequatur of foreign judgments July 27, 2026
  • Adoption in the proposal for a European Parenthood Regulation July 21, 2026
  • Copyright, Targeting and Geo-Blocking: The CJEU Stirs the Pot July 15, 2026
  • A Follow-Up: The German Judges Association’s Response to the HCCH Draft Text of a Future Convention on Parallel Proceedings and Related Actions July 15, 2026
  • Private International Law Dimensions of Singapore’s New Legislation to Combat Online Harms July 14, 2026
  • The 1961 HCCH Apostille Convention: Why All African Countries Should Ratify It? — Insights from Judicial Practice in Africa July 14, 2026
  • The enforcement of an advance on costs for substitute performance at the expense of a Russian debtor in German-French legal relations July 2, 2026
  • “Yes, in principle, but not quite there yet…” – Some Observations on the Public Consultation on the HCCH Draft Text of a Future Convention on Parallel Proceedings and Related Actions June 29, 2026
  • Judgment Mobility Rules in India’s Private International Law Regime: No place for a revision au fond? June 26, 2026
  • Nothing to See Here: The CJEU’s Decision in Case C-232/25 Idzinski June 18, 2026
  • Refusal to Enforce in Egypt of a Californian (U.S.) Judgment for Lack of Reciprocity: What Has Gotten into the Egyptian Supreme Court? June 15, 2026
  • PRC Double Interest neither Double nor Penal: Australian Courts Clear Its Name When Enforcing Chinese Judgments June 10, 2026
  • The AIFC Court, Gazprom v Naftogaz and the Emergence of a New Conduit Jurisdiction Debate June 6, 2026
Link to: On the Desirability of the Alien Tort Statute Link to: On the Desirability of the Alien Tort Statute On the Desirability of the Alien Tort Statute Link to: New Book on Rome II Link to: New Book on Rome II New Book on Rome II
Scroll to top Scroll to top Scroll to top