Conflict of Laws
  • About
  • Editorial board
  • Subscription
  • Submission
  • Materials
  • Contact
  • Click to open the search input field Click to open the search input field Search
  • Menu Menu

New York Agencies to Recognize Same Sex Unions

May 29, 2008/3 Comments/in /by Gilles Cuniberti
image_pdfimage_print

The New York Times reports that the Governor of the State of New York has directed all New York state agencies to revise all statutes and regulations of the State so that same sex unions or marriages can be recognized in New York “as any other legally performed union”.

The NY Times further reports that, interestingly enough, the State of New York does not itself allow gay marriage, but will nevertheless fully recognize unions entered into elsewhere.

Share this entry
  • Share on Facebook
  • Share on X
  • Share on WhatsApp
  • Share on Pinterest
  • Share on LinkedIn
  • Share on Tumblr
  • Share on Vk
  • Share on Reddit
  • Share by Mail
https://conflictoflaws.net/News/2020/08/CoL_Banner-1.png 0 0 Gilles Cuniberti https://conflictoflaws.net/News/2020/08/CoL_Banner-1.png Gilles Cuniberti2008-05-29 22:04:382008-05-29 22:04:38New York Agencies to Recognize Same Sex Unions
3 replies
  1. Giorgio Buono says:
    May 30, 2008 at 5:38 am

    The judgment of February 2008 cited by the article (Martinez v County of Monroe), in which a State Appellate Court decided that a same-sex marriage performed in Canada should be fully recognized in New York for the purposes of spousal health care benefits, can be read here:
    http://www.nycourts.gov/reporter/3dseries/2008/2008_00909.htm

  2. Matteo M. Winkler says:
    May 30, 2008 at 9:21 pm

    I had already noted such an important decision. Many thanks to Gilles and Giorgio for having made this reference.

  3. Richard Frimston says:
    June 1, 2008 at 10:29 am

    I haven’t seen any postings as to the possibly more important changes happening in California? http://www.courtinfo.ca.gov/opinions/documents/S147999.PDF

    California Supreme Court ruling S147999

Comments are closed.

Categories

  • Views
  • News

Most Recent Posts

  • Conflicts of jurisdiction in Senegal: lesson from the Senegalese Supreme Court on Lis Pendens and the Exequatur of foreign judgments July 27, 2026
  • Adoption in the proposal for a European Parenthood Regulation July 21, 2026
  • Copyright, Targeting and Geo-Blocking: The CJEU Stirs the Pot July 15, 2026
  • A Follow-Up: The German Judges Association’s Response to the HCCH Draft Text of a Future Convention on Parallel Proceedings and Related Actions July 15, 2026
  • Private International Law Dimensions of Singapore’s New Legislation to Combat Online Harms July 14, 2026
  • The 1961 HCCH Apostille Convention: Why All African Countries Should Ratify It? — Insights from Judicial Practice in Africa July 14, 2026
  • The enforcement of an advance on costs for substitute performance at the expense of a Russian debtor in German-French legal relations July 2, 2026
  • “Yes, in principle, but not quite there yet…” – Some Observations on the Public Consultation on the HCCH Draft Text of a Future Convention on Parallel Proceedings and Related Actions June 29, 2026
  • Judgment Mobility Rules in India’s Private International Law Regime: No place for a revision au fond? June 26, 2026
  • Nothing to See Here: The CJEU’s Decision in Case C-232/25 Idzinski June 18, 2026
  • Refusal to Enforce in Egypt of a Californian (U.S.) Judgment for Lack of Reciprocity: What Has Gotten into the Egyptian Supreme Court? June 15, 2026
  • PRC Double Interest neither Double nor Penal: Australian Courts Clear Its Name When Enforcing Chinese Judgments June 10, 2026
  • The AIFC Court, Gazprom v Naftogaz and the Emergence of a New Conduit Jurisdiction Debate June 6, 2026
  • Montana Supreme Court Decides International Child Custody Case June 3, 2026
  • China’s Countering Improper Foreign Extraterritorial Jurisdiction Regulation Blocked EU’s Extraterritorial Data Acquisition May 29, 2026
Link to: BIICL event: Group Actions, including Class Actions: Cross-border Aspects Link to: BIICL event: Group Actions, including Class Actions: Cross-border Aspects BIICL event: Group Actions, including Class Actions: Cross-border Aspects Link to: French Marriage Annulled for Lack of Virginity Link to: French Marriage Annulled for Lack of Virginity French Marriage Annulled for Lack of Virginity
Scroll to top Scroll to top Scroll to top