Conflict of Laws
  • About
  • Editorial board
  • Subscription
  • Submission
  • Materials
  • Contact
  • Click to open the search input field Click to open the search input field Search
  • Menu Menu

New York Agencies to Recognize Same Sex Unions

May 29, 2008/3 Comments/in /by Gilles Cuniberti
image_pdfimage_print

The New York Times reports that the Governor of the State of New York has directed all New York state agencies to revise all statutes and regulations of the State so that same sex unions or marriages can be recognized in New York “as any other legally performed union”.

The NY Times further reports that, interestingly enough, the State of New York does not itself allow gay marriage, but will nevertheless fully recognize unions entered into elsewhere.

Share this entry
  • Share on Facebook
  • Share on X
  • Share on WhatsApp
  • Share on Pinterest
  • Share on LinkedIn
  • Share on Tumblr
  • Share on Vk
  • Share on Reddit
  • Share by Mail
https://conflictoflaws.net/News/2020/08/CoL_Banner-1.png 0 0 Gilles Cuniberti https://conflictoflaws.net/News/2020/08/CoL_Banner-1.png Gilles Cuniberti2008-05-29 22:04:382008-05-29 22:04:38New York Agencies to Recognize Same Sex Unions
3 replies
  1. Giorgio Buono says:
    May 30, 2008 at 5:38 am

    The judgment of February 2008 cited by the article (Martinez v County of Monroe), in which a State Appellate Court decided that a same-sex marriage performed in Canada should be fully recognized in New York for the purposes of spousal health care benefits, can be read here:
    http://www.nycourts.gov/reporter/3dseries/2008/2008_00909.htm

  2. Matteo M. Winkler says:
    May 30, 2008 at 9:21 pm

    I had already noted such an important decision. Many thanks to Gilles and Giorgio for having made this reference.

  3. Richard Frimston says:
    June 1, 2008 at 10:29 am

    I haven’t seen any postings as to the possibly more important changes happening in California? http://www.courtinfo.ca.gov/opinions/documents/S147999.PDF

    California Supreme Court ruling S147999

Comments are closed.

Categories

  • Views
  • News

Most Recent Posts

  • From Symbolism to Substance: Comity and Judicial Reform in South Africa’s Foreign Judgments Regime September 15, 2026
  • Persistent and Reasonable Efforts in the Field of Cross-Border Service of Documents. Continuation or Stay of Proceedings? September 12, 2026
  • Speaking for the Dead: Idziski and the Forum for Post-Mortem Likeness Claims September 7, 2026
  • Book Review: Andrew Dickinson and Alexander Thompson, The State Immunity Act 1978 (OUP, 2025) September 7, 2026
  • Political Immobilisation of Iranian Diaspora Property: Lex Situs, Human Rights and Public Policy August 22, 2026
  • The Demise of the Lex Domicilii Matrimonii in South African Private International Law August 18, 2026
  • Support in cross-border transactions by Adults: Contract law vs capacity law August 12, 2026
  • Recognition of Italian Extrajudicial Divorces in Tunisia — Between Methodological Uncertainty and the Need to Preserve Continuity of Personal Status Across Borders August 9, 2026
  • Private International Law and European Society August 4, 2026
  • The New Zealand Supreme Court’s judgment in Kea Investments Ltd v Wikeley on anti-enforcement relief August 3, 2026
  • Beyond Domicile: The BHP Litigation and the Functional Interconnection of Public and Private International Law August 3, 2026
  • Conflicts of jurisdiction in Senegal: lesson from the Senegalese Supreme Court on Lis Pendens and the Exequatur of foreign judgments July 27, 2026
  • Adoption in the proposal for a European Parenthood Regulation July 21, 2026
  • Copyright, Targeting and Geo-Blocking: The CJEU Stirs the Pot July 15, 2026
  • A Follow-Up: The German Judges Association’s Response to the HCCH Draft Text of a Future Convention on Parallel Proceedings and Related Actions July 15, 2026
Link to: BIICL event: Group Actions, including Class Actions: Cross-border Aspects Link to: BIICL event: Group Actions, including Class Actions: Cross-border Aspects BIICL event: Group Actions, including Class Actions: Cross-border Aspects Link to: French Marriage Annulled for Lack of Virginity Link to: French Marriage Annulled for Lack of Virginity French Marriage Annulled for Lack of Virginity
Scroll to top Scroll to top Scroll to top