Conflict of Laws
  • About
  • Editorial board
  • Subscription
  • Submission
  • Materials
  • Contact
  • Click to open the search input field Click to open the search input field Search
  • Menu Menu

Mance: "Is Europe Aiming to Civilise the Common Law"?

February 20, 2007/1 Comment/in /by Martin George
image_pdfimage_print

Jonathan Mance (House of Lords) has published an article in the European Business Law Review entitled, “Is Europe Aiming to Civilise the Common Law?” ((2007) 18 E.B.L. Rev pp. 77-99) Here’s the abstract:

Explains the EC project to develop a Common Frame of Reference (CFR) for substantive civil law, and responds to criticism that the European Commission is acting beyond its competence and planning to replace the UK common law system with a Continental civil code. Reviews the tendency towards civilian principles in the project to harmonise private international law. Examines the development of the CFR project.

Those with access can download the PDF from the Kluwer website. Update: Andrew Dickinson has kindly pointed out that this article is the 2006 Chancery Bar lecture, and can be downloaded for free from here.

Share this entry
  • Share on Facebook
  • Share on X
  • Share on WhatsApp
  • Share on Pinterest
  • Share on LinkedIn
  • Share on Tumblr
  • Share on Vk
  • Share on Reddit
  • Share by Mail
https://conflictoflaws.net/News/2020/08/CoL_Banner-1.png 0 0 Martin George https://conflictoflaws.net/News/2020/08/CoL_Banner-1.png Martin George2007-02-20 15:13:082007-02-24 12:51:30Mance: "Is Europe Aiming to Civilise the Common Law"?
1 reply
  1. Andrew Dickinson says:
    February 23, 2007 at 8:32 pm

    This, the 2006 Chancery Bar lecture, can be downloaded for free from:

    http://www.chba.org.uk/downloads/Lord%20Mance%20Lecture.doc

Comments are closed.

Categories

  • Views
  • News

Most Recent Posts

  • Conflicts of jurisdiction in Senegal: lesson from the Senegalese Supreme Court on Lis Pendens and the Exequatur of foreign judgments July 27, 2026
  • Adoption in the proposal for a European Parenthood Regulation July 21, 2026
  • Copyright, Targeting and Geo-Blocking: The CJEU Stirs the Pot July 15, 2026
  • A Follow-Up: The German Judges Association’s Response to the HCCH Draft Text of a Future Convention on Parallel Proceedings and Related Actions July 15, 2026
  • Private International Law Dimensions of Singapore’s New Legislation to Combat Online Harms July 14, 2026
  • The 1961 HCCH Apostille Convention: Why All African Countries Should Ratify It? — Insights from Judicial Practice in Africa July 14, 2026
  • The enforcement of an advance on costs for substitute performance at the expense of a Russian debtor in German-French legal relations July 2, 2026
  • “Yes, in principle, but not quite there yet…” – Some Observations on the Public Consultation on the HCCH Draft Text of a Future Convention on Parallel Proceedings and Related Actions June 29, 2026
  • Judgment Mobility Rules in India’s Private International Law Regime: No place for a revision au fond? June 26, 2026
  • Nothing to See Here: The CJEU’s Decision in Case C-232/25 Idzinski June 18, 2026
  • Refusal to Enforce in Egypt of a Californian (U.S.) Judgment for Lack of Reciprocity: What Has Gotten into the Egyptian Supreme Court? June 15, 2026
  • PRC Double Interest neither Double nor Penal: Australian Courts Clear Its Name When Enforcing Chinese Judgments June 10, 2026
  • The AIFC Court, Gazprom v Naftogaz and the Emergence of a New Conduit Jurisdiction Debate June 6, 2026
  • Montana Supreme Court Decides International Child Custody Case June 3, 2026
  • China’s Countering Improper Foreign Extraterritorial Jurisdiction Regulation Blocked EU’s Extraterritorial Data Acquisition May 29, 2026
Link to: ECJ: AG Opinion on Article 5 (1) (b) Brussels I Regulation Link to: ECJ: AG Opinion on Article 5 (1) (b) Brussels I Regulation ECJ: AG Opinion on Article 5 (1) (b) Brussels I Regulation Link to: The Differing Approach to Commercial Litigation in the ECJ and the Courts of England and Wales Link to: The Differing Approach to Commercial Litigation in the ECJ and the Courts of England and Wales The Differing Approach to Commercial Litigation in the ECJ and the Courts of...
Scroll to top Scroll to top Scroll to top