Conflict of Laws
  • About
  • Editorial board
  • Subscription
  • Submission
  • Materials
  • Contact
  • Click to open the search input field Click to open the search input field Search
  • Menu Menu

Mance: "Is Europe Aiming to Civilise the Common Law"?

February 20, 2007/1 Comment/in /by Martin George
image_pdfimage_print

Jonathan Mance (House of Lords) has published an article in the European Business Law Review entitled, “Is Europe Aiming to Civilise the Common Law?” ((2007) 18 E.B.L. Rev pp. 77-99) Here’s the abstract:

Explains the EC project to develop a Common Frame of Reference (CFR) for substantive civil law, and responds to criticism that the European Commission is acting beyond its competence and planning to replace the UK common law system with a Continental civil code. Reviews the tendency towards civilian principles in the project to harmonise private international law. Examines the development of the CFR project.

Those with access can download the PDF from the Kluwer website. Update: Andrew Dickinson has kindly pointed out that this article is the 2006 Chancery Bar lecture, and can be downloaded for free from here.

Share this entry
  • Share on Facebook
  • Share on X
  • Share on WhatsApp
  • Share on Pinterest
  • Share on LinkedIn
  • Share on Tumblr
  • Share on Vk
  • Share on Reddit
  • Share by Mail
https://conflictoflaws.net/News/2020/08/CoL_Banner-1.png 0 0 Martin George https://conflictoflaws.net/News/2020/08/CoL_Banner-1.png Martin George2007-02-20 15:13:082007-02-24 12:51:30Mance: "Is Europe Aiming to Civilise the Common Law"?
1 reply
  1. Andrew Dickinson says:
    February 23, 2007 at 8:32 pm

    This, the 2006 Chancery Bar lecture, can be downloaded for free from:

    http://www.chba.org.uk/downloads/Lord%20Mance%20Lecture.doc

Comments are closed.

Categories

  • Views
  • News

Most Recent Posts

  • From Symbolism to Substance: Comity and Judicial Reform in South Africa’s Foreign Judgments Regime September 15, 2026
  • Persistent and Reasonable Efforts in the Field of Cross-Border Service of Documents. Continuation or Stay of Proceedings? September 12, 2026
  • Speaking for the Dead: Idziski and the Forum for Post-Mortem Likeness Claims September 7, 2026
  • Book Review: Andrew Dickinson and Alexander Thompson, The State Immunity Act 1978 (OUP, 2025) September 7, 2026
  • Political Immobilisation of Iranian Diaspora Property: Lex Situs, Human Rights and Public Policy August 22, 2026
  • The Demise of the Lex Domicilii Matrimonii in South African Private International Law August 18, 2026
  • Support in cross-border transactions by Adults: Contract law vs capacity law August 12, 2026
  • Recognition of Italian Extrajudicial Divorces in Tunisia — Between Methodological Uncertainty and the Need to Preserve Continuity of Personal Status Across Borders August 9, 2026
  • Private International Law and European Society August 4, 2026
  • The New Zealand Supreme Court’s judgment in Kea Investments Ltd v Wikeley on anti-enforcement relief August 3, 2026
  • Beyond Domicile: The BHP Litigation and the Functional Interconnection of Public and Private International Law August 3, 2026
  • Conflicts of jurisdiction in Senegal: lesson from the Senegalese Supreme Court on Lis Pendens and the Exequatur of foreign judgments July 27, 2026
  • Adoption in the proposal for a European Parenthood Regulation July 21, 2026
  • Copyright, Targeting and Geo-Blocking: The CJEU Stirs the Pot July 15, 2026
  • A Follow-Up: The German Judges Association’s Response to the HCCH Draft Text of a Future Convention on Parallel Proceedings and Related Actions July 15, 2026
Link to: ECJ: AG Opinion on Article 5 (1) (b) Brussels I Regulation Link to: ECJ: AG Opinion on Article 5 (1) (b) Brussels I Regulation ECJ: AG Opinion on Article 5 (1) (b) Brussels I Regulation Link to: The Differing Approach to Commercial Litigation in the ECJ and the Courts of England and Wales Link to: The Differing Approach to Commercial Litigation in the ECJ and the Courts of England and Wales The Differing Approach to Commercial Litigation in the ECJ and the Courts of...
Scroll to top Scroll to top Scroll to top