If you are not happy with the results below please do another search
The first issue of 2014 of the Dutch journal on Private International Law Nederlands Internationaal Privaatrecht includes an analysis of the Brussels I Recast and the influence on Dutch legal practice, an article on Child abduction and the ECHR, and two case notes; one on the Impacto Azul case and one on the Povse case. […]
The Academy of European Law (ERA) and the Max Planck Institute Luxembourg will co-organize a conference on
On 26 November 2013, the Grand Chamber of the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) delivered its judgment in the case of
The third issue of 2013 of the Dutch journal on Private International Law,
This post has been jointly drafted by Gilles Cuniberti, Xandra Kramer, Thalia Kruger and Marta Requejo. Civil Justice in the EU – Growing and Teething? Questions regarding implementation, practice and the outlook for future policy is the title of the conference held in Uppsala, Sweden, on Thursday and Friday last week, co-organised by the Swedish […]
Dr. Rafael Arenas García is Professor of Private International Law at Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona Perhaps one of the most difficult questions in International Law is the relationship between international conventions. States must comply with the obligations established in the treaties they are bound by. All the parties to the treaty are entitled to require […]
Horatia Muir Watt is Professor of Law at Sciences Po Law School I. Framing the child-return issue. Several recent cases handed down by the two European Courts appear to be opening new vistas for conflicts of laws, in which human rights play a large part. The cases are well-known (ECJ/CJUE Aguirre v Pelz 2010; ECtHR […]
Introduction The accession of the European Union (EU) to the European Convention on Human Rights is proving difficult. PIL has not been spared. In the field of recognition the biggest concern was not long ago represented by the conflict between the ECtHR decision in Pellegrini, and the European will to eliminate the intermediate procedure to […]
In June, the European Court of Human Rights ruled in Povse v. Austria that the abolition of exequatur was compatible with the European Convention of Human Rights, and that the mechanism introduced by the Brussels IIa Regulation was not dysfunctional from the perspective of the Convention. In December 2010, the Court of Justice of the European […]
Recently, the July/August issue of the German law journal “Praxis des Internationalen Privat- und Verfahrensrechts” (