Conflict of Laws
  • About
  • Editorial board
  • Subscription
  • Submission
  • Materials
  • Contact
  • Click to open the search input field Click to open the search input field Search
  • Menu Menu

About Trey Childress

This author has not written his bio yet.
But we are proud to say that Trey Childress contributed 100 entries already.

Entries by Trey Childress

P.R. China’s First Statute on Choice of Law (translated in English)

January 12, 2011/in /by Trey Childress

Following up on Xiao Fang’s excellent post

Choice of Law in American Courts 2010

January 10, 2011/in /by Trey Childress

Once again, Dean Symeon Symeonides has compiled his annual choice of law survey.  Here is the abstract: This is the Twenty-Fourth Annual Survey of American Choice-of-Law Cases. It is written at the request of the Association of American Law Schools Section on Conflict of Laws, and is intended as a service to fellow teachers and […]

The Battle Between Oklahoma and Foreign Law

November 3, 2010/4 Comments/in /by Trey Childress

Yesterday was election day in the United States, when the entire House of Representative and one third of the US Senate stood for reelection.  It was also a day when ballot measures were taken up in several states.  Strangely, choice of law was on the ballot in one state.  Voters in Oklahoma were given the option to […]

The United States Supreme Court to Take a Fresh Look at Personal Jurisdiction

September 28, 2010/in /by Trey Childress

Today, the United States Supreme Court granted certiorari in two cases that involve the so-called “stream-of-commerce” theory of personal jurisdiction.  Under that theory, a United States court may assert personal jurisdicition over a foreign company defendant when that company’s products find their way into U.S. markets, even though the foreign company has not targeted that specific market for […]

Conference Announcement: Extraterritoriality in US Law

September 23, 2010/in /by Trey Childress

Beyond Borders: Extraterritoriality in American Law Southwestern Law School, Nov. 12, 2010 On Friday, November 12, 2010,

Keitner on Kiobel and the future of the Alien Tort Statute

September 22, 2010/1 Comment/in /by Trey Childress

The following post, cross-posted on Opinio Juris, continues to analyze the import of the Second Circuit’s recent decision in Kiobel v. Royal Dutch Petroleum, holding that corporations may not be sued under the Alien Tort Statute for violations of customary international law.  Our thanks to Professor Keitner for sharing her thoughts. Not Dead Yet: Some […]

Is it the End of the Alien Tort Statute?

September 17, 2010/in /by Trey Childress

Today, the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit entered an important decision in Kiobel v. Royal Dutch Petroleum regarding whether corporations may be sued under the Alien Tort Statute.  The upshot of the opinion is that corporations cannot be sued under the Alien Tort State for violations of customary international law because […]

US Securities Laws and Extraterritoriality

June 28, 2010/1 Comment/in /by Trey Childress

In a landmark decision, the United States Supreme Court ruled last week in the case of

American Society of International Law Call for Proposals

June 16, 2010/in /by Trey Childress

Many of our readers will be interested to know that the American Society of International Law is looking for proposals for its Annual Meeting program.  Here is the announcement: “ASIL welcomes ideas from its members for the 105th Annual Meeting program, Harmony and Dissonance in International Law. To view the 2011 theme statement, click here

The Supreme Court and Foreign Sovereign Immunity

June 1, 2010/1 Comment/in /by Trey Childress

Today, the United States Supreme Court released its decision in

Page 8 of 10«‹678910›»

Categories

  • Views
  • News

Most Recent Posts

  • Conflicts of jurisdiction in Senegal: lesson from the Senegalese Supreme Court on Lis Pendens and the Exequatur of foreign judgments July 27, 2026
  • Adoption in the proposal for a European Parenthood Regulation July 21, 2026
  • Copyright, Targeting and Geo-Blocking: The CJEU Stirs the Pot July 15, 2026
  • A Follow-Up: The German Judges Association’s Response to the HCCH Draft Text of a Future Convention on Parallel Proceedings and Related Actions July 15, 2026
  • Private International Law Dimensions of Singapore’s New Legislation to Combat Online Harms July 14, 2026
  • The 1961 HCCH Apostille Convention: Why All African Countries Should Ratify It? — Insights from Judicial Practice in Africa July 14, 2026
  • The enforcement of an advance on costs for substitute performance at the expense of a Russian debtor in German-French legal relations July 2, 2026
  • “Yes, in principle, but not quite there yet…” – Some Observations on the Public Consultation on the HCCH Draft Text of a Future Convention on Parallel Proceedings and Related Actions June 29, 2026
  • Judgment Mobility Rules in India’s Private International Law Regime: No place for a revision au fond? June 26, 2026
  • Nothing to See Here: The CJEU’s Decision in Case C-232/25 Idzinski June 18, 2026
  • Refusal to Enforce in Egypt of a Californian (U.S.) Judgment for Lack of Reciprocity: What Has Gotten into the Egyptian Supreme Court? June 15, 2026
  • PRC Double Interest neither Double nor Penal: Australian Courts Clear Its Name When Enforcing Chinese Judgments June 10, 2026
  • The AIFC Court, Gazprom v Naftogaz and the Emergence of a New Conduit Jurisdiction Debate June 6, 2026
  • Montana Supreme Court Decides International Child Custody Case June 3, 2026
  • China’s Countering Improper Foreign Extraterritorial Jurisdiction Regulation Blocked EU’s Extraterritorial Data Acquisition May 29, 2026
Scroll to top Scroll to top Scroll to top