Conflict of Laws
  • About
  • Editorial board
  • Subscription
  • Submission
  • Materials
  • Contact
  • Click to open the search input field Click to open the search input field Search
  • Menu Menu

About Trey Childress

This author has not written his bio yet.
But we are proud to say that Trey Childress contributed 100 entries already.

Entries by Trey Childress

International Comity: Governmental Statements of Interest in Private International Litigation

September 16, 2009/in /by Trey Childress

The ongoing case of Khulumani v. Barclay National Bank presents interesting questions concerning the nexus of the public and private in international law.  In Khulumani, a large class of South African plaintiffs assert that several multinational corporations (including Daimler, Ford, General Motors, and IBM)  aided and abetted apartheid crimes (including torture, extrajudicial killing, and arbitrary denationalization) […]

Asserting Personal Jurisdiction in Human Rights Cases

September 9, 2009/in /by Trey Childress

My colleague Roger Alford has a fascinating post over at the blog Opinio Juris (available 

Chinese Judgment Enforced in the United States

August 24, 2009/10 Comments/in /by Trey Childress

On August 12, 2009, the United States District Court for the Central District of California issued a

Pleading Alien Tort Statute Cases in the US: Heightened Pleading in International Cases

August 19, 2009/in /by Trey Childress

As recently discussed on this

United States Congress Considering Legislation Relating to Pleading

July 23, 2009/1 Comment/in /by Trey Childress

As was recently reported on this

Publication: The University of Pennsylvania Journal of International Law

July 9, 2009/in /by Trey Childress

The University of Pennsylvania Journal of International Law (Volume 30, Number 4) has recently published a symposium in celebration of its anniversary.  Private international lawyers will be interested in the following contributions: International Litigation and Arbitration Gary Born, The Principle of Judicial Non-Interference in International Arbitral Proceedings Catherine A. Rogers, Lawyers Without Borders David J. […]

United States Congress Considering Legislation Relating to Foreign Defendants

May 26, 2009/1 Comment/in /by Trey Childress

On May 19, 2009, the United States Senate Committee on the Judiciary, Subcommittee on Administrative Oversight and the Courts held a hearing entitled “Leveling the Playing Field and Protecting Americans:  Holding Foreign Manufacturers Accountable.”  The purpose of the hearing was to explore whether legislation is necessary to deal specifically with foreign defendants in products liability cases.  The […]

Heightened Pleading Standards in US Private International Law Cases

May 20, 2009/in /by Trey Childress

On Monday, the United States Supreme Court decided the case of Ashcroft v. Iqbal, which concerned whether current and former federal officials, including FBI Director Robert Mueller and former Attorney General John Ashcroft, are entitled to qualified immunity against allegations they knew of or condoned racial and religious discrimination against individuals detained in the wake […]

Conference: International Association of Procedural Law Toronto Conference

May 15, 2009/in /by Trey Childress

From June 3-5, 2009, the International Association of Procedural Law is holding its annual conference in Toronto, Canada.  Entitled “The Future of Categories–Categories of the Future,” the conference will showcase “leading proceduralists from around the world” who will present “their perspectives on the ways in which procedural reform is precipitating a collapse of the traditional categories […]

Forum Non Conveniens in US Courts

May 14, 2009/in /by Trey Childress

On May 1, 2009, the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit issued a noteworthy opinion in the consolidated cases of Abad v. Bayer Corp. and

Page 10 of 10«‹8910

Categories

  • Views
  • News

Most Recent Posts

  • Conflicts of jurisdiction in Senegal: lesson from the Senegalese Supreme Court on Lis Pendens and the Exequatur of foreign judgments July 27, 2026
  • Adoption in the proposal for a European Parenthood Regulation July 21, 2026
  • Copyright, Targeting and Geo-Blocking: The CJEU Stirs the Pot July 15, 2026
  • A Follow-Up: The German Judges Association’s Response to the HCCH Draft Text of a Future Convention on Parallel Proceedings and Related Actions July 15, 2026
  • Private International Law Dimensions of Singapore’s New Legislation to Combat Online Harms July 14, 2026
  • The 1961 HCCH Apostille Convention: Why All African Countries Should Ratify It? — Insights from Judicial Practice in Africa July 14, 2026
  • The enforcement of an advance on costs for substitute performance at the expense of a Russian debtor in German-French legal relations July 2, 2026
  • “Yes, in principle, but not quite there yet…” – Some Observations on the Public Consultation on the HCCH Draft Text of a Future Convention on Parallel Proceedings and Related Actions June 29, 2026
  • Judgment Mobility Rules in India’s Private International Law Regime: No place for a revision au fond? June 26, 2026
  • Nothing to See Here: The CJEU’s Decision in Case C-232/25 Idzinski June 18, 2026
  • Refusal to Enforce in Egypt of a Californian (U.S.) Judgment for Lack of Reciprocity: What Has Gotten into the Egyptian Supreme Court? June 15, 2026
  • PRC Double Interest neither Double nor Penal: Australian Courts Clear Its Name When Enforcing Chinese Judgments June 10, 2026
  • The AIFC Court, Gazprom v Naftogaz and the Emergence of a New Conduit Jurisdiction Debate June 6, 2026
  • Montana Supreme Court Decides International Child Custody Case June 3, 2026
  • China’s Countering Improper Foreign Extraterritorial Jurisdiction Regulation Blocked EU’s Extraterritorial Data Acquisition May 29, 2026
Scroll to top Scroll to top Scroll to top