Conflict of Laws
  • About
  • Editorial board
  • Subscription
  • Submission
  • Materials
  • Contact
  • Click to open the search input field Click to open the search input field Search
  • Menu Menu

About Martin George

This author has not written his bio yet.
But we are proud to say that Martin George contributed 357 entries already.

Entries by Martin George

Party Autonomy in the Private International Law of Contracts

August 9, 2006/in /by Martin George

Giesela Ruehl (Max Planck Institute for Comparative and Private International Law) has posted Party Autonomy in the Private International Law of Contracts: Transatlantic Convergence and Economic Efficiency on SSRN. Here's the abstract: It is commonly acknowledged that during the 20th century American and European choice-of-law theory have drifted apart: in the United States the American […]

Methods and Approaches in Choice of Law: An Economic Perspective

August 9, 2006/in /by Martin George

Giesela Ruehl (Max Planck Institute for Comparative and Private International Law) has posted Methods and Approaches in Choice of Law: An Economic Perspective on the Social Science Research Network (SSRN). The abstract reads as follows: After years of disregard, the law and economics movement has finally taken note of the field of choice of law. […]

Maccaba v Lichtenstein, and an article

August 2, 2006/in /by Martin George

Maccaba v Lictenstein [2006] EWHC 1901 (QB) The court held that, for there to be an arbitration agreement, there had to be an agreement evidenced in writing between the two prospective parties to the arbitration. In the instant case, no such enforceable agreement as argued for by the applicant had been proved on the evidence […]

WPP Holdings Italy v Marco Benatti

July 26, 2006/in /by Martin George

WPP HOLDINGS ITALY SRL (2) WPP 2005 LTD (3) BERKELEY SQUARE HOLDING BV v MARCO BENATTI (2006) [2006] EWHC 1641 (Comm) It was held that the question of whether proceedings were correctly issued for the purposes of Council Regulation 44/2001 Art.30 had to be determined by the national law in which they were instituted. There […]

EU Matrimonial Property and Divorce Proposals

July 20, 2006/in /by Martin George

The EU has published a Green Paper and a Proposal in the fields of matrimonial property, and the jurisdictional rules and law applicable to divorce respectively. Green paper on conflict of laws in matters concerning matrimonial property regimes, including the question of jurisdiction and mutual recognition The Commission has adopted a new Green Paper to […]

Harding v Wealands

July 6, 2006/in /by Martin George

The House of Lords has handed down its judgment in Harding v Wealands [2006] UKHL 32. The issue is whether damages for personal injury caused by negligent driving in New South Wales should be calculated according to the applicable law selected in accordance with Part III of the Private International Law (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act 1995 […]

EU Commission Study on “Brussels I”

June 3, 2006/in /by Martin George

The University of Heidelberg has been asked to head Study JLS/C4/2005/03 by the EU Commission, concerning the application of Regulation 44/2001/EC ("Brussels I"). The full description of the study is as follows: The European Commission has asked Prof. Hess, Prof. Pfeiffer and Prof. Schlosser (University of Munich) to elaborate a comparative study concerning the evaluation […]

The Impact of Recent Judgments of the European Court

June 3, 2006/in /by Martin George

Adrian Briggs' recent article in the University of Oxford Faculty of Law Legal Studies Research Paper Series, entitled The Impact of Recent Judgments of the European Court on English Procedural Law and Practice, is now available for download from

UK Government to opt-out of Rome I Regulation

May 11, 2006/1 Comment/in /by Martin George

In a controversial decision, the UK Government has decided not to opt-in to the proposed Regulation on the law applicable to contractual obligations ("Rome I").

Cambridge Law Journal Case Notes

April 29, 2006/in /by Martin George

The new edition of the Cambridge Law Journal, VOL 65; PART 1; 2006, discusses two recent cases: Domicile – illegal resident: Mark v. Mark. (pp. 35-36) Renvoi – proof of foreign law: Neilson v. Overseas Projects Corporation of Victoria Ltd. (pp.37-39) More details on the CLJ can be found at its

Page 35 of 36«‹33343536›

Categories

  • Views
  • News

Most Recent Posts

  • Conflicts of jurisdiction in Senegal: lesson from the Senegalese Supreme Court on Lis Pendens and the Exequatur of foreign judgments July 27, 2026
  • Adoption in the proposal for a European Parenthood Regulation July 21, 2026
  • Copyright, Targeting and Geo-Blocking: The CJEU Stirs the Pot July 15, 2026
  • A Follow-Up: The German Judges Association’s Response to the HCCH Draft Text of a Future Convention on Parallel Proceedings and Related Actions July 15, 2026
  • Private International Law Dimensions of Singapore’s New Legislation to Combat Online Harms July 14, 2026
  • The 1961 HCCH Apostille Convention: Why All African Countries Should Ratify It? — Insights from Judicial Practice in Africa July 14, 2026
  • The enforcement of an advance on costs for substitute performance at the expense of a Russian debtor in German-French legal relations July 2, 2026
  • “Yes, in principle, but not quite there yet…” – Some Observations on the Public Consultation on the HCCH Draft Text of a Future Convention on Parallel Proceedings and Related Actions June 29, 2026
  • Judgment Mobility Rules in India’s Private International Law Regime: No place for a revision au fond? June 26, 2026
  • Nothing to See Here: The CJEU’s Decision in Case C-232/25 Idzinski June 18, 2026
  • Refusal to Enforce in Egypt of a Californian (U.S.) Judgment for Lack of Reciprocity: What Has Gotten into the Egyptian Supreme Court? June 15, 2026
  • PRC Double Interest neither Double nor Penal: Australian Courts Clear Its Name When Enforcing Chinese Judgments June 10, 2026
  • The AIFC Court, Gazprom v Naftogaz and the Emergence of a New Conduit Jurisdiction Debate June 6, 2026
  • Montana Supreme Court Decides International Child Custody Case June 3, 2026
  • China’s Countering Improper Foreign Extraterritorial Jurisdiction Regulation Blocked EU’s Extraterritorial Data Acquisition May 29, 2026
Scroll to top Scroll to top Scroll to top