Conflict of Laws
  • About
  • Editorial board
  • Subscription
  • Submission
  • Materials
  • Contact
  • Click to open the search input field Click to open the search input field Search
  • Menu Menu

About Jan von Hein

This author has not written his bio yet.
But we are proud to say that Jan von Hein contributed 271 entries already.

Entries by Jan von Hein

The CJEU Shrems cases – Personal Data Protection and International Trade Regulation

December 19, 2020/1 Comment/in Views/by Jan von Hein

Carmen Otero García-Castrillón, Complutense University of Madrid, has kindly provided us with her thoughts on personal data protection and international trade regulation. An extended version of this post will appear as a contribution to the results of the Spanish Research Project lead by E. Rodríguez Pineau and E. Torralba Mendiola “Protección transfronteriza de la transmisión […]

Praxis des Internationalen Privat- und Verfahrensrechts (IPRax) 6/2020: Abstracts

November 2, 2020/in News/by Jan von Hein

The latest issue of the „Praxis des Internationalen Privat- und Verfahrensrechts (IPRax)“ features the following articles:   C. Wendehorst: Digital Assets in Private International Law Rights with third party effect (erga omnes rights, rights in rem) in digital assets may exist at four levels: (a) the level of physical manifestation of data on a medium; […]

Chris Thomale on the EP Draft Report on Corporate Due Diligence

October 27, 2020/in Views/by Jan von Hein

Professor Chris Thomale, University of Vienna and Roma Tre University, has kindly provided us with his thoughts on the recent EP Draft Report on corporate due diligence and corporate accountability.   In recent years, debate on Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) has picked up speed, finally reaching the EU. The

A step in the right direction, but nothing more – A critical note on the Draft Directive on mandatory Human Rights Due Diligence

October 26, 2020/in Views/by Jan von Hein

Written by Bastian Brunk, research assistant at the Humboldt University of Berlin and doctoral candidate at the Institute for Comparative and Private International Law at the University of Freiburg.   In April of 2020, EU Commissioner Didier Reynders announced plans for a legislative initiative that would introduce EU-wide mandatory human rights due diligence requirements for […]

Forward to the Past: A Critical Note on the European Parliament’s Approach to Artificial Intelligence in Private International Law

October 22, 2020/in Views/by Jan von Hein

On 20 October 2020, the European Parliament adopted – with a large margin – a resolution with recommendations to the Commission on a civil liability regime for artificial intelligence (AI). The text of this resolution is available

Global Perspectives on Responsible Artificial Intelligence

October 22, 2020/in News/by Jan von Hein

In June 2020, the Freiburg Institute for Advanced Studies (

Transboundary Environmental Pollution in PIL from a Comparative Perspective

October 19, 2020/in News/by Jan von Hein

Back to the Future – (Re-)Introducing the Principle of Ubiquity for Business-related Human Rights Claims

October 12, 2020/3 Comments/in Views/by Jan von Hein

On 11 September 2020, the European Parliament’s Committee on Legal Affairs presented a

Praxis des Internationalen Privat- und Verfahrensrechts (IPRax) 5/2020: Abstracts

September 9, 2020/in News/by Jan von Hein

The latest issue of the „Praxis des Internationalen Privat- und Verfahrensrechts (IPRax)“ features the following articles:   D. Coester-Waltjen: Some Thoughts on Recital 7 Rome I Regulation and a Consistent and Systematic Interpretation of Jurisdictional and Choice of Law Rules. Decisions of the ECJ in recent years have cast some new light on recital 7 […]

Lord Jonathan Mance on the future relationship between the United Kingdom and Europe after Brexit

July 20, 2020/2 Comments/in Views/by Jan von Hein

Nicole Grohmann, a doctoral candidate at the Institute for Comparative and Private International Law, Dept. III, at the University of Freiburg, has kindly provided us with the following report on a recent speech by Lord Jonathan Mance. On Wednesday, 15 July 2020, the former Deputy President of the Supreme Court of the United Kingdom (UKSC), […]

Page 6 of 28«‹45678›»

Categories

  • Views
  • News

Most Recent Posts

  • The New Zealand Supreme Court’s judgment in Kea Investments Ltd v Wikeley on anti-enforcement relief August 3, 2026
  • Beyond Domicile: The BHP Litigation and the Functional Interconnection of Public and Private International Law August 3, 2026
  • Conflicts of jurisdiction in Senegal: lesson from the Senegalese Supreme Court on Lis Pendens and the Exequatur of foreign judgments July 27, 2026
  • Adoption in the proposal for a European Parenthood Regulation July 21, 2026
  • Copyright, Targeting and Geo-Blocking: The CJEU Stirs the Pot July 15, 2026
  • A Follow-Up: The German Judges Association’s Response to the HCCH Draft Text of a Future Convention on Parallel Proceedings and Related Actions July 15, 2026
  • Private International Law Dimensions of Singapore’s New Legislation to Combat Online Harms July 14, 2026
  • The 1961 HCCH Apostille Convention: Why All African Countries Should Ratify It? — Insights from Judicial Practice in Africa July 14, 2026
  • The enforcement of an advance on costs for substitute performance at the expense of a Russian debtor in German-French legal relations July 2, 2026
  • “Yes, in principle, but not quite there yet…” – Some Observations on the Public Consultation on the HCCH Draft Text of a Future Convention on Parallel Proceedings and Related Actions June 29, 2026
  • Judgment Mobility Rules in India’s Private International Law Regime: No place for a revision au fond? June 26, 2026
  • Nothing to See Here: The CJEU’s Decision in Case C-232/25 Idzinski June 18, 2026
  • Refusal to Enforce in Egypt of a Californian (U.S.) Judgment for Lack of Reciprocity: What Has Gotten into the Egyptian Supreme Court? June 15, 2026
  • PRC Double Interest neither Double nor Penal: Australian Courts Clear Its Name When Enforcing Chinese Judgments June 10, 2026
  • The AIFC Court, Gazprom v Naftogaz and the Emergence of a New Conduit Jurisdiction Debate June 6, 2026
Scroll to top Scroll to top Scroll to top