Conflict of Laws
  • About
  • Editorial board
  • Subscription
  • Submission
  • Materials
  • Contact
  • Click to open the search input field Click to open the search input field Search
  • Menu Menu

About Cristina Mariottini

This author has not written his bio yet.
But we are proud to say that Cristina Mariottini contributed 109 entries already.

Entries by Cristina Mariottini

A Boost in the Number of European Small Claims Procedures before Spanish Courts: A Collateral Effect of the Massive Number of Applications for European Payment Orders?

February 15, 2022/in Views/by Cristina Mariottini

Carlos Santaló Goris, Researcher at the Max Planck Institute Luxembourg for International, European and Regulatory Procedural Law and Ph.D. candidate at the University of Luxembourg, offers an analysis of the Spanish statistics on the European Small Claims Procedure. Until 2017, the annual number of

Giustizia consensuale No 2/2021: Abstracts

January 27, 2022/in News/by Cristina Mariottini

The second issue of 2021 of

A Reform of French Law Inspired by an Inaccurate Interpretation of the EAPO Regulation?

January 22, 2022/1 Comment/in Views/by Cristina Mariottini

Carlos Santaló Goris, Research Fellow at the Max Planck Institute Luxembourg for International, European and Regulatory Procedural Law and Ph.D. candidate at the University of Luxembourg, offers an analysis on the recently approved reform of the French Manual on Tax Procedures (“Livre des procédures fiscales”) influenced by Regulation No 655/2014, establishing a European Account Preservation […]

The sixth EFFORTS Newsletter is here!

January 19, 2022/in News/by Cristina Mariottini

Stewart and Bowker: Ristau’s International Judicial Assistance – Second Edition

January 3, 2022/in News/by Cristina Mariottini

David P. Stewart and David W. Bowker,

The fifth EFFORTS Newsletter is here!

December 17, 2021/in News/by Cristina Mariottini

8th CPLJ Webinar – 28 January 2022

December 13, 2021/in News/by Cristina Mariottini

 Comparative Procedural Law and Justice (CPLJ) is a global project of the Max Planck Institute Luxembourg for Procedural Law, with the support of the Luxembourg National Research Fund (019/13946847), involving more than one hundred scholars from all over the world. CPLJ is envisioned as a comprehensive study of comparative civil procedural law and civil dispute […]

On Digitalisation of Judicial Cooperation and Access to Justice: The Commission Proposal

December 4, 2021/in News/by Cristina Mariottini

Dr. Lenka Valkova, Researcher at the University of Milan, offers a description of the Proposal for a Regulation on the digitalisation of judicial cooperation and access to justice in cross-border civil, commercial and criminal matters, and amending certain acts in the judicial cooperation, COM(2021) 759 final, issued on 1 December 2021. Although a comprehensive set […]

Rivista di diritto internazionale privato e processuale (RDIPP) No 3/2021: Abstracts

November 18, 2021/in News/by Cristina Mariottini

The third issue of 2021 of the

Book Release: EUFams II Final Study

October 15, 2021/in News/by Cristina Mariottini

Thomas Pfeiffer/Quincy C. Lobach/Tobias Rapp (Eds.), “Facilitating Cross-Border Family Life – Towards a Common European Understanding”, Heidelberg University Publishing 2021 (link) The EUFams II consortium has just released the project’s Final Study. The volume contains the papers presented at the project’s Final Conference. The contributors were invited to present historical developments, discuss the status quo, […]

Page 6 of 11«‹45678›»

Categories

  • Views
  • News

Most Recent Posts

  • Conflicts of jurisdiction in Senegal: lesson from the Senegalese Supreme Court on Lis Pendens and the Exequatur of foreign judgments July 27, 2026
  • Adoption in the proposal for a European Parenthood Regulation July 21, 2026
  • Copyright, Targeting and Geo-Blocking: The CJEU Stirs the Pot July 15, 2026
  • A Follow-Up: The German Judges Association’s Response to the HCCH Draft Text of a Future Convention on Parallel Proceedings and Related Actions July 15, 2026
  • Private International Law Dimensions of Singapore’s New Legislation to Combat Online Harms July 14, 2026
  • The 1961 HCCH Apostille Convention: Why All African Countries Should Ratify It? — Insights from Judicial Practice in Africa July 14, 2026
  • The enforcement of an advance on costs for substitute performance at the expense of a Russian debtor in German-French legal relations July 2, 2026
  • “Yes, in principle, but not quite there yet…” – Some Observations on the Public Consultation on the HCCH Draft Text of a Future Convention on Parallel Proceedings and Related Actions June 29, 2026
  • Judgment Mobility Rules in India’s Private International Law Regime: No place for a revision au fond? June 26, 2026
  • Nothing to See Here: The CJEU’s Decision in Case C-232/25 Idzinski June 18, 2026
  • Refusal to Enforce in Egypt of a Californian (U.S.) Judgment for Lack of Reciprocity: What Has Gotten into the Egyptian Supreme Court? June 15, 2026
  • PRC Double Interest neither Double nor Penal: Australian Courts Clear Its Name When Enforcing Chinese Judgments June 10, 2026
  • The AIFC Court, Gazprom v Naftogaz and the Emergence of a New Conduit Jurisdiction Debate June 6, 2026
  • Montana Supreme Court Decides International Child Custody Case June 3, 2026
  • China’s Countering Improper Foreign Extraterritorial Jurisdiction Regulation Blocked EU’s Extraterritorial Data Acquisition May 29, 2026
Scroll to top Scroll to top Scroll to top