Conflict of Laws
  • About
  • Editorial board
  • Subscription
  • Submission
  • Materials
  • Contact
  • Click to open the search input field Click to open the search input field Search
  • Menu Menu

About Cristina Mariottini

This author has not written his bio yet.
But we are proud to say that Cristina Mariottini contributed 109 entries already.

Entries by Cristina Mariottini

Rivista di diritto internazionale privato e processuale (RDIPP) No 3/2019: Abstracts

October 31, 2019/in News/by Cristina Mariottini

The third issue of 2019 of the Rivista di diritto internazionale privato e processuale (RDIPP, published by CEDAM) was just released and it features: Stefania Bariatti, Professor at the University of Milan, Volontà delle parti e internazionalità del rapporto giuridico: alcuni sviluppi recenti nella giurisprudenza della Corte di giustizia sui regolamenti europei in materia di diritto internazionale […]

EUFams II – International Exchange Seminar at the Max Planck Institute Luxembourg for Procedural Law

October 21, 2019/in News/by Cristina Mariottini

On 24-25 October 2019, the Max Planck Institute Luxembourg for Procedural Law will host an International Exchange Seminar in the framework of the Project “EUFams II – Facilitating Cross-Border Family Life: Towards a Common European Understanding”. Funded by the European Commission, the Project aims to develop a common expertise and understanding of the EU instruments […]

Cross-Border Enforcement in the EU (“IC2BE”) – Second Italian National Seminar, 8 November 2019

October 13, 2019/in News/by Cristina Mariottini

Seminar: Instruments and solutions for a more effective cross-border debt recovery in the EU/“Strumenti e soluzioni per un più efficace recupero transfrontaliero dei crediti”. On 8 November 2019, the University of Milan (Università degli Studi di Milano) will host a second national seminar in the framework of the research project “Informed Choices in Cross-Border Enforcement” […]

Max Planck Institute Luxembourg: Upcoming Conference on International Commercial Courts and the Coordination of Cross-Border Proceedings

October 10, 2019/in News/by Cristina Mariottini

The progressive global establishment of international commercial courts has marked a defining moment in the growth of the legal services sector in international commercial dispute resolution. By offering litigants the option of having their disputes adjudicated by experienced and specialized judges, often from both civil law and common law traditions, these courts have resulted in […]

Law Shopping in Relation to Data Processing in the Context of Employment: The Dark Side of the EU System for Criminal Judicial Cooperation?

September 30, 2019/in Views/by Cristina Mariottini

This post was written by Ms Martina Mantovani, Research Fellow at the Max Planck Institute Luxembourg. The author is grateful to her colleague, Ms Adriani Dori, for pointing out the tweet. On 26th September 2019, Dutch MEP Sophie in ‘t Veld announced through her

Cross-Border Debt Recovery in the EU – Workshop on the application of the “second generation” regulations in France and Luxembourg

September 20, 2019/in News/by Cristina Mariottini

On Friday 27 September 2019, the Max Planck Institute Luxembourg will host a workshop on

Rivista di diritto internazionale privato e processuale (RDIPP) No 2/2019: Abstracts

September 5, 2019/in News/by Cristina Mariottini

The second issue of 2019 of the Rivista di diritto internazionale privato e processuale (RDIPP, published by CEDAM) was just released and it features: Adrian Briggs, Professor at Oxford University, Brexit and Private International Law: An English Perspective (in English) The effect of Brexit on private international law in England will depend on the precise terms on […]

New Article on Non-Party Access to Court Documents and the Open Justice Principle

August 20, 2019/in Views/by Cristina Mariottini

Written by Ana Koprivica Harvey Ms Ana Koprivica Harvey (Max Planck Institute Luxembourg for International, European and Regulatory Procedural Law) recently posted a new paper in the MPILux Research Paper Series, titled 

First impressions from Kirchberg on the EAPO Regulation – Opinion of AG Szpunar in Case C-555/18

August 14, 2019/in Views/by Cristina Mariottini

Written by Carlos Santaló Goris Carlos Santaló Goris is a researcher at the Max Planck Institute Luxembourg for International, European and Regulatory Procedural Law, and Ph.D. candidate at the University of Luxembourg. He offers a summary and an analysis of AG Spuznar’s Opinion on the Case C-555/18, K.H.K. v. B.A.C., E.E.K. I. Introduction Less than […]

Page 11 of 11«‹91011

Categories

  • Views
  • News

Most Recent Posts

  • Conflicts of jurisdiction in Senegal: lesson from the Senegalese Supreme Court on Lis Pendens and the Exequatur of foreign judgments July 27, 2026
  • Adoption in the proposal for a European Parenthood Regulation July 21, 2026
  • Copyright, Targeting and Geo-Blocking: The CJEU Stirs the Pot July 15, 2026
  • A Follow-Up: The German Judges Association’s Response to the HCCH Draft Text of a Future Convention on Parallel Proceedings and Related Actions July 15, 2026
  • Private International Law Dimensions of Singapore’s New Legislation to Combat Online Harms July 14, 2026
  • The 1961 HCCH Apostille Convention: Why All African Countries Should Ratify It? — Insights from Judicial Practice in Africa July 14, 2026
  • The enforcement of an advance on costs for substitute performance at the expense of a Russian debtor in German-French legal relations July 2, 2026
  • “Yes, in principle, but not quite there yet…” – Some Observations on the Public Consultation on the HCCH Draft Text of a Future Convention on Parallel Proceedings and Related Actions June 29, 2026
  • Judgment Mobility Rules in India’s Private International Law Regime: No place for a revision au fond? June 26, 2026
  • Nothing to See Here: The CJEU’s Decision in Case C-232/25 Idzinski June 18, 2026
  • Refusal to Enforce in Egypt of a Californian (U.S.) Judgment for Lack of Reciprocity: What Has Gotten into the Egyptian Supreme Court? June 15, 2026
  • PRC Double Interest neither Double nor Penal: Australian Courts Clear Its Name When Enforcing Chinese Judgments June 10, 2026
  • The AIFC Court, Gazprom v Naftogaz and the Emergence of a New Conduit Jurisdiction Debate June 6, 2026
  • Montana Supreme Court Decides International Child Custody Case June 3, 2026
  • China’s Countering Improper Foreign Extraterritorial Jurisdiction Regulation Blocked EU’s Extraterritorial Data Acquisition May 29, 2026
Scroll to top Scroll to top Scroll to top