This author has not written his bio yet.
But we are proud to say that Tobias Lutzi contributed 254 entries already.
by Marta Liduma, LLB candidate in International and European Law, University of Groningen A Dutch actor dies in March. By April, his likeness starts to appear widely. Generated videos show him promoting a supplement, and one clip ends with a link to a shop selling shirts printed with his face. A single man in Germany […]
This announcement has kindly been provided by Matthias Lehmann and Lukas Petschning (University of Vienna). On 30 November and 1 December 2026, the University of Vienna (Section for Comparative, Uniform and Private International Law) will host a conference entitled „Conflict of Laws in International Arbitration“.
This announcement has kindly been shared with us by
by Sibusiso Mabaso, Lecturer in Private International Law, University of South Africa For many years, South African private international law relied on the lex domicilii matrimonii as connecting factor to determine the legal system applicable to the proprietary consequences of a marriage. The lex domicilii matrimonii is interpreted as the husband’s domicile at the time […]
This post has kindly been provided by
A new volume coming out of the Programme in European Private Law for Postgraduates (
By Graham Smith, Of Counsel, Bird & Bird LLP, London, UK The CJEU’s recent copyright decision in Anne Frank endorses state of the art geo-blocking as an effective way of shielding a website from the different copyright laws of another EU Member State. Although the result on the facts is welcome, the potential implications of […]
On 8 July, King&Spalding will be hosting a webinar on the new ICC Arbitration Rules, which entered into force last month. The webinar will feature contributions from multiple members of the firms arbitration practice as well as a Q&A. More information and an option to register can be found
Earlier today, the Court of Justice rendered its decision in Case C-232/25 Idziski, essentially confirming its previous case law, combined with a restrictive reading of its infamous decision in Joint Cases C-509/09 and C-161/10 eDate. The facts of the case (which was given the entirely fictitious name Idziski) are eerily similar to those of the […]