Conflict of Laws
  • About
  • Editorial board
  • Subscription
  • Submission
  • Materials
  • Contact
  • Click to open the search input field Click to open the search input field Search
  • Menu Menu

De Miguel on Derecho Privado de Internet (5th edn)

May 31, 2015/in /by Marta Requejo
image_pdfimage_print

The fifth edition of Derecho privado de internet (Thomson Reuters Civitas, 1150 pages), by Professor Pedro De Miguel Asensio (Universidad Complutense de Madrid) has just been published. This well-known treatise cover a wide range of areas of Internet regulation and the ordering of Internet activities with a particular focus on Private Law and Conflict of Laws aspects.

As noted by Prof. Gerald Spindler in his review of the previous edition of this book in the Journal of Intellectual Property, Information Technology and Electronic Commerce Law (JIPITEC), 2012, pp. 88-90: “De Miguel’s book is indeed an encyclopedia of Internet law, with special regard to its implementation in Spain. The effort to undertake such a comparative legal work is huge, and it is the only way to cope with the global phenomenon of the Internet. The book is highly recommendable for everyone engaged in electronic commerce and Internet law as a rich source of information that spans all kinds of legal areas, thus making it indispensable for European lawyers in these fields”.

Further information on the new edition is available on the publisher’s website.

Share this entry
  • Share on Facebook
  • Share on X
  • Share on WhatsApp
  • Share on Pinterest
  • Share on LinkedIn
  • Share on Tumblr
  • Share on Vk
  • Share on Reddit
  • Share by Mail
https://conflictoflaws.net/News/2020/08/CoL_Banner-1.png 0 0 Marta Requejo https://conflictoflaws.net/News/2020/08/CoL_Banner-1.png Marta Requejo2015-05-31 08:54:592015-05-31 08:54:59De Miguel on Derecho Privado de Internet (5th edn)

Categories

  • Views
  • News

Most Recent Posts

  • Conflicts of jurisdiction in Senegal: lesson from the Senegalese Supreme Court on Lis Pendens and the Exequatur of foreign judgments July 27, 2026
  • Adoption in the proposal for a European Parenthood Regulation July 21, 2026
  • Copyright, Targeting and Geo-Blocking: The CJEU Stirs the Pot July 15, 2026
  • A Follow-Up: The German Judges Association’s Response to the HCCH Draft Text of a Future Convention on Parallel Proceedings and Related Actions July 15, 2026
  • Private International Law Dimensions of Singapore’s New Legislation to Combat Online Harms July 14, 2026
  • The 1961 HCCH Apostille Convention: Why All African Countries Should Ratify It? — Insights from Judicial Practice in Africa July 14, 2026
  • The enforcement of an advance on costs for substitute performance at the expense of a Russian debtor in German-French legal relations July 2, 2026
  • “Yes, in principle, but not quite there yet…” – Some Observations on the Public Consultation on the HCCH Draft Text of a Future Convention on Parallel Proceedings and Related Actions June 29, 2026
  • Judgment Mobility Rules in India’s Private International Law Regime: No place for a revision au fond? June 26, 2026
  • Nothing to See Here: The CJEU’s Decision in Case C-232/25 Idzinski June 18, 2026
  • Refusal to Enforce in Egypt of a Californian (U.S.) Judgment for Lack of Reciprocity: What Has Gotten into the Egyptian Supreme Court? June 15, 2026
  • PRC Double Interest neither Double nor Penal: Australian Courts Clear Its Name When Enforcing Chinese Judgments June 10, 2026
  • The AIFC Court, Gazprom v Naftogaz and the Emergence of a New Conduit Jurisdiction Debate June 6, 2026
  • Montana Supreme Court Decides International Child Custody Case June 3, 2026
  • China’s Countering Improper Foreign Extraterritorial Jurisdiction Regulation Blocked EU’s Extraterritorial Data Acquisition May 29, 2026
Link to: The new European Insolvency Regulation Link to: The new European Insolvency Regulation The new European Insolvency Regulation Link to: Recognition of Foreign Bankruptcy and the Requirement of Reciprocity (Swiss Federal Court) Link to: Recognition of Foreign Bankruptcy and the Requirement of Reciprocity (Swiss Federal Court) Recognition of Foreign Bankruptcy and the Requirement of Reciprocity (Swiss...
Scroll to top Scroll to top Scroll to top