Conflict of Laws
  • About
  • Editorial board
  • Subscription
  • Submission
  • Materials
  • Contact
  • Click to open the search input field Click to open the search input field Search
  • Menu Menu

AAPrIL online seminar: Margaret Casey KC on “The 21st century global family – How science, law and a Convention tried and failed to establish a long-term relationship”

October 11, 2026/0 Comments/in News/by Michael Douglas
image_pdfimage_print

The Australasian Association of Private International Law (AAPrIL) is hosting its 4th seminar for 2026. The seminar is fully online and free to attend.

Margaret Casey KC will present on the topic, “The 21st century global family – How science, law and a Convention tried and failed to establish a long-term relationship”. The seminar will be chaired by Jack Wass.

Abstract:

Advances in medical science and changes in what is meant by ‘family’ mean that establishing parentage can be uncertain in domestic and international law. This creates issues for globally mobile families and lifelong status issues for some people. As numbers increasingly turn to surrogacy to form families, this creates legal challenges. Across Australasia, some jurisdictions (eg New Zealand and in Australia) regulate forms of surrogacy and try to accommodate citizens who travel overseas to implement surrogacy plans. However, parents returning home with a child born through surrogacy overseas may still confront problems in having their parentage recognised (with all the consequential rights and benefits for their child). International responses have been attempted. In 2016, Margaret Casey KC was appointed to the experts group established by the Hague Conference on Private International Law (HCCH) to recommend an acceptable set of rules for cross-border recognition of surrogacy and parentage. The final report was submitted to the HCCH Special Commission earlier this year. Although this report was substantial, consensus has not been reached and the project has been paused. In this seminar, Margaret will outline the context in which families are now being formed, the global nature of ‘family planning’, and resulting jurisdictional issues. She will comment on reform legislation being considered in New Zealand and whether or not it is fit for purpose for the modern family.

Details:

  • Where: online only
  • When: Thursday, 29 October 2026, 5:00 – 6:00pm AEDT (Australian time)
  • Registration: free, following the details in the flyer below

Please share the invitation with anyone you consider may be interested.

Flyer_AAPrIL Seminar 2026_4

Tags: Australasian Association of Private International Law, international family law, surrogacy, family law, HCCH, Australia, New Zealand
Share this entry
  • Share on Facebook
  • Share on X
  • Share on WhatsApp
  • Share on Pinterest
  • Share on LinkedIn
  • Share on Tumblr
  • Share on Vk
  • Share on Reddit
  • Share by Mail
https://conflictoflaws.net/News/2020/08/CoL_Banner-1.png 0 0 Michael Douglas https://conflictoflaws.net/News/2020/08/CoL_Banner-1.png Michael Douglas2026-10-11 16:01:392026-10-11 16:01:50AAPrIL online seminar: Margaret Casey KC on “The 21st century global family – How science, law and a Convention tried and failed to establish a long-term relationship”
0 replies

Leave a Reply

Want to join the discussion?
Feel free to contribute!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Categories

  • Views
  • News

Most Recent Posts

  • Talaq Divorce Cases in the United States October 7, 2026
  • Book Review: Choice of Forum Clauses in Asia (Lemuel L Lopez) October 5, 2026
  • Zamzam on Egyptian Private International Law (in Arabic): Towards Reviving the Golden Age of Egyptian Private International Law October 2, 2026
  • Maintenance Duties for a Gestational Surrogate Following Non-Recognition – An Unreported Spanish Judgment September 22, 2026
  • From Symbolism to Substance: Comity and Judicial Reform in South Africa’s Foreign Judgments Regime September 15, 2026
  • Persistent and Reasonable Efforts in the Field of Cross-Border Service of Documents. Continuation or Stay of Proceedings? September 12, 2026
  • Speaking for the Dead: Idziski and the Forum for Post-Mortem Likeness Claims September 7, 2026
  • Book Review: Andrew Dickinson and Alexander Thompson, The State Immunity Act 1978 (OUP, 2025) September 7, 2026
  • Political Immobilisation of Iranian Diaspora Property: Lex Situs, Human Rights and Public Policy August 22, 2026
  • The Demise of the Lex Domicilii Matrimonii in South African Private International Law August 18, 2026
  • Support in cross-border transactions by Adults: Contract law vs capacity law August 12, 2026
  • Recognition of Italian Extrajudicial Divorces in Tunisia — Between Methodological Uncertainty and the Need to Preserve Continuity of Personal Status Across Borders August 9, 2026
  • Private International Law and European Society August 4, 2026
  • The New Zealand Supreme Court’s judgment in Kea Investments Ltd v Wikeley on anti-enforcement relief August 3, 2026
  • Beyond Domicile: The BHP Litigation and the Functional Interconnection of Public and Private International Law August 3, 2026
Link to: Lindemann Fellowship for Private International Law: Call for Applications 2026 Link to: Lindemann Fellowship for Private International Law: Call for Applications 2026 Lindemann Fellowship for Private International Law: Call for Applications 2...
Scroll to top Scroll to top Scroll to top