Conflict of Laws
  • About
  • Editorial board
  • Subscription
  • Submission
  • Materials
  • Contact
  • Click to open the search input field Click to open the search input field Search
  • Menu Menu

Out now: New International Commercial Courts

February 10, 2024/in News/by Giesela Ruehl
image_pdfimage_print

Over the past two decades, various jurisdictions around the world have created new specialised domestic courts to resolve international commercial disputes. Located in the Gulf region (Abu Dhabi, Dubai, Qatar), in Asia (Singapore, China, Kazakhstan) and in Europe (Germany, France, the Netherlands), these courts enrich the current landscape of the resolution of international commercial disputes. In particular, they present themselves as alternatives to litigation before ordinary courts, on the one hand, and to international commercial arbitration on the other.

In a recently published book – edited by Man Yip from Singapore Management University and me – we study international commercial courts from a comparative perspective and through various strands of inquiry. First, we offer a detailed analysis of the reasons for the creation of these courts and examine their jurisdictional, institutional and procedural features. Second, we scrutinise the motivations and/or constraints of jurisdictions that have decided against launching their own versions of ‘international commercial courts’. Finally, and most crucially, we systematically review the impact and the success of these courts addressing questions such as: what are the metrics of success, and is success wholly dependent on size of the docket? What role do the courts play in international commercial dispute resolution? What contributions can we expect from them in the future? Are these courts necessary? In addressing these questions, we hope that the book advances our understanding of the role of international commercial courts in the resolution of cross-border disputes.

The book is the result of comparative study prepared for the General Congress of the International Academy of Comparative Law that was held in 2022 in Asunción (Paraguay). It contains 21 national and special reports written by a stellar group of authors:

  • Martin Bernet (Bernet Arbitration/ Dispute Management, Switzerland)
  • Pamela Bookman (Fordham University, United States)
  • Michael Byrne (Dubai International Financial Centre Courts, Dubai),
  • Tatiana Cardoso Squeff (Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil)
  • Gustavo Cerqueira (University of Côte d’Azur, France)
  • Edyta Figura-Góralczyk (Cracow University of Economics, Poland),
  • David Foxton (High Court of England and Wales, United Kingdom),
  • Hoang Thao Anh (University of Law, Hue University, Vietnam),
  • Zhengxin Huo (China University of Political Science and Law, People’s Republic of China)
  • Saloni Khanderia (OP Jindal Global University, India)
  • Kwan Ho Lau (Singapore Management University, Singapore),
  • Seipati Lepele (University of Pretoria, South Africa)
  • Claudia Lima Marques (Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil)
  • Chien-Chung Lin (National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taiwan)
  • Michele Angelo Lupoi (University of Bologna, Italy)
  • María Blanca Noodt Taquela (University of Buenos Aires, Argentina),
  • Peter Nørgaard (Danish Ministry of Justice, Denmark)
  • Maria Panezi (University of New Brunswick, Canada)
  • Thomas Riehm (University of Passau, Germany)
  • Clement Salung Petersen (University of Copenhagen, Denmark),
  • Elsabe Schoeman (University of Pretoria, South Africa)
  • Florian Scholz-Berger (University of Vienna, Austria)
  • S.I. Strong (Emory University, United States)
  • Willem Theus (KU Leuven and UCLouvain, Belgium)
  • Quirin Thomas (University of Passau, Germany)
  • Geert Van Calster (KU Leuven, Belgium)
  • Vu Thi Huong (University of Law, Hue University, Vietnam)
  • Marlene Wethmar-Lemmer (University of South Africa)

More information about the book is available here.

Tags: comparative law, International Academy of Comparative Law, international commercial courts, Cross-border dispute resolution
Share this entry
  • Share on Facebook
  • Share on X
  • Share on WhatsApp
  • Share on Pinterest
  • Share on LinkedIn
  • Share on Tumblr
  • Share on Vk
  • Share on Reddit
  • Share by Mail
https://conflictoflaws.net/News/2020/08/CoL_Banner-1.png 0 0 Giesela Ruehl https://conflictoflaws.net/News/2020/08/CoL_Banner-1.png Giesela Ruehl2024-02-10 18:10:472024-02-11 14:31:13Out now: New International Commercial Courts

Categories

  • Views
  • News

Most Recent Posts

  • Support in cross-border transactions by Adults: Contract law vs capacity law August 12, 2026
  • Recognition of Italian Extrajudicial Divorces in Tunisia — Between Methodological Uncertainty and the Need to Preserve Continuity of Personal Status Across Borders August 9, 2026
  • Private International Law and European Society August 4, 2026
  • The New Zealand Supreme Court’s judgment in Kea Investments Ltd v Wikeley on anti-enforcement relief August 3, 2026
  • Beyond Domicile: The BHP Litigation and the Functional Interconnection of Public and Private International Law August 3, 2026
  • Conflicts of jurisdiction in Senegal: lesson from the Senegalese Supreme Court on Lis Pendens and the Exequatur of foreign judgments July 27, 2026
  • Adoption in the proposal for a European Parenthood Regulation July 21, 2026
  • Copyright, Targeting and Geo-Blocking: The CJEU Stirs the Pot July 15, 2026
  • A Follow-Up: The German Judges Association’s Response to the HCCH Draft Text of a Future Convention on Parallel Proceedings and Related Actions July 15, 2026
  • Private International Law Dimensions of Singapore’s New Legislation to Combat Online Harms July 14, 2026
  • The 1961 HCCH Apostille Convention: Why All African Countries Should Ratify It? — Insights from Judicial Practice in Africa July 14, 2026
  • The enforcement of an advance on costs for substitute performance at the expense of a Russian debtor in German-French legal relations July 2, 2026
  • “Yes, in principle, but not quite there yet…” – Some Observations on the Public Consultation on the HCCH Draft Text of a Future Convention on Parallel Proceedings and Related Actions June 29, 2026
  • Judgment Mobility Rules in India’s Private International Law Regime: No place for a revision au fond? June 26, 2026
  • Nothing to See Here: The CJEU’s Decision in Case C-232/25 Idzinski June 18, 2026
Link to: Conference on Cross-Border Dispute Resolution in Dubrovnik, Croatia, on 8-10 May 2024 Link to: Conference on Cross-Border Dispute Resolution in Dubrovnik, Croatia, on 8-10 May 2024 Conference on Cross-Border Dispute Resolution in Dubrovnik, Croatia, on 8-10... Link to: „El clásico“ of Recognition and Enforcement – A Manifest Breach of Freedom of Expression as a Public Policy Violation: Thoughts on AG Szpunar 8.2.2024 – Opinion C-633/22, ECLI:EU:C:2024:127 – Real Madrid Club de Fútbol Link to: „El clásico“ of Recognition and Enforcement – A Manifest Breach of Freedom of Expression as a Public Policy Violation: Thoughts on AG Szpunar 8.2.2024 – Opinion C-633/22, ECLI:EU:C:2024:127 – Real Madrid Club de Fútbol „El clásico“ of Recognition and Enforcement – A Manifest Breach of Freedom...
Scroll to top Scroll to top Scroll to top