Conflict of Laws
  • About
  • Editorial board
  • Subscription
  • Submission
  • Materials
  • Contact
  • Click to open the search input field Click to open the search input field Search
  • Menu Menu

Three-day seminar “Populism and the New Foreign Relations Law: Between Public International Law, ‘External Public Law, and Conflict of Laws.” June 8-10

March 22, 2022/3 Comments/in News/by Ralf Michaels
image_pdfimage_print

The Max Planck Institute for Comparative Public Law and International Law (Heidelberg) and the Max Planck Institute for Comparative and International Private Law (Hamburg) are pleased to announce an intensive three- day seminar on “Populism and the New Foreign Relations Law: Between Public International Law, ‘External Public Law, and Conflict of Laws.”

The seminar will take place in Heidelberg on June 8-10, 2022, and will be co-directed by Prof. Anne Peters, Director, MPIL Heidelberg; Prof. Ralf Michaels, Director, MPI Hamburg; and Prof. Karen Knop, University of Toronto and Max Planck Law Fellow.

Costs for transportation (economy train or flight in Europe, lump sum for overseas), accommodation and meals in Heidelberg will be provided.

The seminar will host 20 Doctoral, Post-Doctoral and graduate researchers in law or other related fields. Application deadline: April 24, 2022

More information here.

 

Share this entry
  • Share on Facebook
  • Share on X
  • Share on WhatsApp
  • Share on Pinterest
  • Share on LinkedIn
  • Share on Tumblr
  • Share on Vk
  • Share on Reddit
  • Share by Mail
https://conflictoflaws.net/News/2020/08/CoL_Banner-1.png 0 0 Ralf Michaels https://conflictoflaws.net/News/2020/08/CoL_Banner-1.png Ralf Michaels2022-03-22 17:47:552022-03-23 09:56:03Three-day seminar “Populism and the New Foreign Relations Law: Between Public International Law, ‘External Public Law, and Conflict of Laws.” June 8-10
3 replies
  1. Andrey Zuev says:
    March 23, 2022 at 7:49 am

    It’s a very interesting theme since starting from Protagoras we know about the cultural relativity of values used to prove one point of view. I am eager to listen to the participants and probably will want to add my thoughts to the discussion.

  2. Anette Kreutzfeld says:
    March 23, 2022 at 9:35 am

    We are organizing this seminar here at the MPIL. It takes place from 8-10 June 2022, not 18-20 nor 18 – 30 June. Could you please correct the date? Thanks.

  3. Bruno Nagem says:
    March 27, 2022 at 10:17 pm

    I’m so excited for this seminar. The theme is so actual and thought-provoking. In Brazil, my country of origin, the populism that has manipulated culture, politics and education, and everyone loses with this nefarious practice. I will certainly apply for this seminar, I believe I have a lot to contribute and debate.

Comments are closed.

Categories

  • Views
  • News

Most Recent Posts

  • The New Zealand Supreme Court’s judgment in Kea Investments Ltd v Wikeley on anti-enforcement relief August 3, 2026
  • Beyond Domicile: The BHP Litigation and the Functional Interconnection of Public and Private International Law August 3, 2026
  • Conflicts of jurisdiction in Senegal: lesson from the Senegalese Supreme Court on Lis Pendens and the Exequatur of foreign judgments July 27, 2026
  • Adoption in the proposal for a European Parenthood Regulation July 21, 2026
  • Copyright, Targeting and Geo-Blocking: The CJEU Stirs the Pot July 15, 2026
  • A Follow-Up: The German Judges Association’s Response to the HCCH Draft Text of a Future Convention on Parallel Proceedings and Related Actions July 15, 2026
  • Private International Law Dimensions of Singapore’s New Legislation to Combat Online Harms July 14, 2026
  • The 1961 HCCH Apostille Convention: Why All African Countries Should Ratify It? — Insights from Judicial Practice in Africa July 14, 2026
  • The enforcement of an advance on costs for substitute performance at the expense of a Russian debtor in German-French legal relations July 2, 2026
  • “Yes, in principle, but not quite there yet…” – Some Observations on the Public Consultation on the HCCH Draft Text of a Future Convention on Parallel Proceedings and Related Actions June 29, 2026
  • Judgment Mobility Rules in India’s Private International Law Regime: No place for a revision au fond? June 26, 2026
  • Nothing to See Here: The CJEU’s Decision in Case C-232/25 Idzinski June 18, 2026
  • Refusal to Enforce in Egypt of a Californian (U.S.) Judgment for Lack of Reciprocity: What Has Gotten into the Egyptian Supreme Court? June 15, 2026
  • PRC Double Interest neither Double nor Penal: Australian Courts Clear Its Name When Enforcing Chinese Judgments June 10, 2026
  • The AIFC Court, Gazprom v Naftogaz and the Emergence of a New Conduit Jurisdiction Debate June 6, 2026
Link to: 9th CPLJ Webinar – 1 April 2022 Link to: 9th CPLJ Webinar – 1 April 2022 9th CPLJ Webinar – 1 April 2022 Link to: CJEU on centre of main interests (COMI) and its subsequent transfer (and Brexit) under the Insolvency Regulation 2015 in the case Galapagos BidCo, C-723/20 Link to: CJEU on centre of main interests (COMI) and its subsequent transfer (and Brexit) under the Insolvency Regulation 2015 in the case Galapagos BidCo, C-723/20 CJEU on centre of main interests (COMI) and its subsequent transfer (and Brexit)...
Scroll to top Scroll to top Scroll to top