Conflict of Laws
  • About
  • Editorial board
  • Subscription
  • Submission
  • Materials
  • Contact
  • Click to open the search input field Click to open the search input field Search
  • Menu Menu

EU Becomes the First Party to Accede to the 2019 Hague Judgments Convention

July 13, 2022/2 Comments/in News/by Tobias Lutzi
image_pdfimage_print

Earlier this week, the Council of the European Union has adopted the decision for the EU to accede to the 2019 Hague Judgments Convention (which, in accordance with Art. 27(1) of the Convention, binds all Member States except Denmark). Once a second party either ratifies, accepts, or approves, or accedes to the Convention, it will enter into force one year after the deposit of the instrument of ratification, acceptance, approval or accession by that second State (Art. 28(1)). More information is available here.

Share this entry
  • Share on Facebook
  • Share on X
  • Share on WhatsApp
  • Share on Pinterest
  • Share on LinkedIn
  • Share on Tumblr
  • Share on Vk
  • Share on Reddit
  • Share by Mail
https://conflictoflaws.net/News/2020/08/CoL_Banner-1.png 0 0 Tobias Lutzi https://conflictoflaws.net/News/2020/08/CoL_Banner-1.png Tobias Lutzi2022-07-13 23:41:562022-07-13 23:45:07EU Becomes the First Party to Accede to the 2019 Hague Judgments Convention
2 replies
  1. Mayela Celis says:
    July 14, 2022 at 10:24 am

    Very interesting news. Just a quick note: while the EU has taken the decision to accede, it has not yet deposited its instrument of accession (or instrument of approval as it is usually the case for REIO) with the Depositary (the MFA NL). This international act is absolutely essential. Thus, it has not yet become the first State to accede to the HCCH Judgments Convention but it may indeed become the first State to accede in the (near) future (if no one files such an instrument before the EU).
    See https://www.hcch.net/en/instruments/conventions/status-table/?cid=137
    https://treatydatabase.overheid.nl/en/Treaty/Details/013672

  2. Tobias Lutzi says:
    July 14, 2022 at 11:38 am

    You’re right; still, it’s the first party to formally decide to accede to the Convention.

Comments are closed.

Categories

  • Views
  • News

Most Recent Posts

  • Conflicts of jurisdiction in Senegal: lesson from the Senegalese Supreme Court on Lis Pendens and the Exequatur of foreign judgments July 27, 2026
  • Adoption in the proposal for a European Parenthood Regulation July 21, 2026
  • Copyright, Targeting and Geo-Blocking: The CJEU Stirs the Pot July 15, 2026
  • A Follow-Up: The German Judges Association’s Response to the HCCH Draft Text of a Future Convention on Parallel Proceedings and Related Actions July 15, 2026
  • Private International Law Dimensions of Singapore’s New Legislation to Combat Online Harms July 14, 2026
  • The 1961 HCCH Apostille Convention: Why All African Countries Should Ratify It? — Insights from Judicial Practice in Africa July 14, 2026
  • The enforcement of an advance on costs for substitute performance at the expense of a Russian debtor in German-French legal relations July 2, 2026
  • “Yes, in principle, but not quite there yet…” – Some Observations on the Public Consultation on the HCCH Draft Text of a Future Convention on Parallel Proceedings and Related Actions June 29, 2026
  • Judgment Mobility Rules in India’s Private International Law Regime: No place for a revision au fond? June 26, 2026
  • Nothing to See Here: The CJEU’s Decision in Case C-232/25 Idzinski June 18, 2026
  • Refusal to Enforce in Egypt of a Californian (U.S.) Judgment for Lack of Reciprocity: What Has Gotten into the Egyptian Supreme Court? June 15, 2026
  • PRC Double Interest neither Double nor Penal: Australian Courts Clear Its Name When Enforcing Chinese Judgments June 10, 2026
  • The AIFC Court, Gazprom v Naftogaz and the Emergence of a New Conduit Jurisdiction Debate June 6, 2026
  • Montana Supreme Court Decides International Child Custody Case June 3, 2026
  • China’s Countering Improper Foreign Extraterritorial Jurisdiction Regulation Blocked EU’s Extraterritorial Data Acquisition May 29, 2026
Link to: CERIL Report Reviews Cross-Border Effects in European Preventive Restructuring Link to: CERIL Report Reviews Cross-Border Effects in European Preventive Restructuring CERIL Report Reviews Cross-Border Effects in European Preventive Restructur... Link to: Is Chinese Judicial Mediation Settlement ‘Judgment’ in Private International Law? Link to: Is Chinese Judicial Mediation Settlement ‘Judgment’ in Private International Law? Is Chinese Judicial Mediation Settlement ‘Judgment’ in Private International...
Scroll to top Scroll to top Scroll to top