Conflict of Laws
  • About
  • Editorial board
  • Subscription
  • Submission
  • Materials
  • Contact
  • Click to open the search input field Click to open the search input field Search
  • Menu Menu

Ratification of The Choice of Court Agreements Convention

October 14, 2014/5 Comments/in /by Marta Requejo
image_pdfimage_print

(Many thanks to François Mailhé, Associate Professor Paris 2, Panthéon-Assas, for the tip)

Last Friday (10.10.2014) the EU Justice Ministers approved a decision ratifying the Choice of Court Agreements Convention, 2005 (the Convention has been signed by the US, 19.1.2009, and by the EU, 1.4.2009; and ratified by Mexico, 26.9.2007). For those who are not familiar with it: The Convention is aimed at ensuring the effectiveness of choice of court agreements (“forum selection clauses”) between parties to international commercial transactions. By doing so, the Convention provides greater certainty to businesses engaging in cross-border activities and therefore creates a legal environment more amenable to international trade and investment. In practice, ratifying the Convention will ensure that EU companies have more legal certainty when doing business with firms outside the EU: they will be able to trust that their choice of court to deal with a dispute will be respected by the courts of the countries that have ratified the Convention, and that the judgment given by the chosen court will be recognised and enforced in the countries which apply it.

Next steps: Following approval by Member States, the consent of the European Parliament will be asked. Once it gives its accord, the decision will be finally adopted by the Council and enter into force in the European Union.

Share this entry
  • Share on Facebook
  • Share on X
  • Share on WhatsApp
  • Share on Pinterest
  • Share on LinkedIn
  • Share on Tumblr
  • Share on Vk
  • Share on Reddit
  • Share by Mail
https://conflictoflaws.net/News/2020/08/CoL_Banner-1.png 0 0 Marta Requejo https://conflictoflaws.net/News/2020/08/CoL_Banner-1.png Marta Requejo2014-10-14 04:17:152014-10-13 12:54:25Ratification of The Choice of Court Agreements Convention
5 replies
  1. Maciej Lewandowski says:
    October 14, 2014 at 7:09 am

    The EU Council asked for the European Parliament consent already in September (see doc. 13241/14 in the EU Council registry of documents). EP Legal Affairs committee considered the draft report on its 13th of October meeting.

  2. Marta Requejo says:
    October 14, 2014 at 7:14 am

    Thanks for this quick reply, Maciej. Funny that The Hague Conference has not updated the website with this piece of news . Maybe you could provide us with the link to the document? Would be great!

    Marta

  3. Giacomo Pailli says:
    October 14, 2014 at 1:34 pm

    …..and eventually this Convention will enter into force!
    I wrote my very first article on this convention and was wondering if it would ever enter into force.

    Well, this appears to be a very good news for the business community: it means that choice of court agreements between EU and Mexico will be safer…..

  4. Maciej Lewandowski says:
    October 15, 2014 at 10:05 am

    as for the links to EU Council doc http://data.consilium.europa.eu/doc/document/ST-13241-2014-INIT/fr/pdf,
    JURI draft report – http://www.europarl.europa.eu/meetdocs/2014_2019/documents/juri/pr/1034/1034426/1034426fr.pdf

  5. Geert van Calster says:
    October 16, 2014 at 4:40 pm

    I am not so sure this is a welcome development all-round. See my earleir analysis on http://wp.me/p289fR-gb . Geert.

Comments are closed.

Categories

  • Views
  • News

Most Recent Posts

  • Recognition of Italian Extrajudicial Divorces in Tunisia — Between Methodological Uncertainty and the Need to Preserve Continuity of Personal Status Across Borders August 9, 2026
  • Private International Law and European Society August 4, 2026
  • The New Zealand Supreme Court’s judgment in Kea Investments Ltd v Wikeley on anti-enforcement relief August 3, 2026
  • Beyond Domicile: The BHP Litigation and the Functional Interconnection of Public and Private International Law August 3, 2026
  • Conflicts of jurisdiction in Senegal: lesson from the Senegalese Supreme Court on Lis Pendens and the Exequatur of foreign judgments July 27, 2026
  • Adoption in the proposal for a European Parenthood Regulation July 21, 2026
  • Copyright, Targeting and Geo-Blocking: The CJEU Stirs the Pot July 15, 2026
  • A Follow-Up: The German Judges Association’s Response to the HCCH Draft Text of a Future Convention on Parallel Proceedings and Related Actions July 15, 2026
  • Private International Law Dimensions of Singapore’s New Legislation to Combat Online Harms July 14, 2026
  • The 1961 HCCH Apostille Convention: Why All African Countries Should Ratify It? — Insights from Judicial Practice in Africa July 14, 2026
  • The enforcement of an advance on costs for substitute performance at the expense of a Russian debtor in German-French legal relations July 2, 2026
  • “Yes, in principle, but not quite there yet…” – Some Observations on the Public Consultation on the HCCH Draft Text of a Future Convention on Parallel Proceedings and Related Actions June 29, 2026
  • Judgment Mobility Rules in India’s Private International Law Regime: No place for a revision au fond? June 26, 2026
  • Nothing to See Here: The CJEU’s Decision in Case C-232/25 Idzinski June 18, 2026
  • Refusal to Enforce in Egypt of a Californian (U.S.) Judgment for Lack of Reciprocity: What Has Gotten into the Egyptian Supreme Court? June 15, 2026
Link to: Anuario Español de Derecho Internacional Privado, vol. XIII Link to: Anuario Español de Derecho Internacional Privado, vol. XIII Anuario Español de Derecho Internacional Privado, vol. XIII Link to: Dutch Private International Law journal, 2014 second and third issue published Link to: Dutch Private International Law journal, 2014 second and third issue published Dutch Private International Law journal, 2014 second and third issue publis...
Scroll to top Scroll to top Scroll to top