Conflict of Laws
  • About
  • Editorial board
  • Subscription
  • Submission
  • Materials
  • Contact
  • Click to open the search input field Click to open the search input field Search
  • Menu Menu

Sciences Po PILAGG Workshop Series, Spring 2012

November 18, 2011/in /by Gilles Cuniberti
image_pdfimage_print

The workshop on Private International Law as Global Governance (PILAGG) at the Law School of the Paris Institute of Political Science (Sciences Po) will take place on Thursdays or Fridays at 12:30 pm, at the Law School.

The speakers for the Spring 2012 will be:

• 20th January: Mads ANDENAS (“External effects of national ECHR judgments”)
• 26th January (doctoral workshop): Shotaro HAMAMOTO
• 27th January: Ingo VENZKE (“On words and deeds”)
• 9th February (doctoral workshop): Benoit FRYDMAN
• 10th and 11th February (Saturday, full-day doctoral workshop): David KENNEDY
• 16th February: Michael WEIBEL
• 8th March: Michael KARAYANNI
• 9th March: George A. BERMANN
• 22nd March: Jeremy HEYMANN
• 23rd March: Alex MILLS
• 12th April (doctoral workshop): Diego P. FERNÁNDEZ ARROYO
• 13th April: Michael HELLNER
• 11th May, Final Meeting (full day, see Program)

Where: unless otherwise announced, Law School, 13 rue de l’Université 75007 Paris, Room J210 (2nd floor).
When: 12:30 to 14:30 pm

More information is available here.

Share this entry
  • Share on Facebook
  • Share on X
  • Share on WhatsApp
  • Share on Pinterest
  • Share on LinkedIn
  • Share on Tumblr
  • Share on Vk
  • Share on Reddit
  • Share by Mail
https://conflictoflaws.net/News/2020/08/CoL_Banner-1.png 0 0 Gilles Cuniberti https://conflictoflaws.net/News/2020/08/CoL_Banner-1.png Gilles Cuniberti2011-11-18 01:33:432011-11-21 13:49:46Sciences Po PILAGG Workshop Series, Spring 2012

Categories

  • Views
  • News

Most Recent Posts

  • The Demise of the Lex Domicilii Matrimonii in South African Private International Law August 18, 2026
  • Support in cross-border transactions by Adults: Contract law vs capacity law August 12, 2026
  • Recognition of Italian Extrajudicial Divorces in Tunisia — Between Methodological Uncertainty and the Need to Preserve Continuity of Personal Status Across Borders August 9, 2026
  • Private International Law and European Society August 4, 2026
  • The New Zealand Supreme Court’s judgment in Kea Investments Ltd v Wikeley on anti-enforcement relief August 3, 2026
  • Beyond Domicile: The BHP Litigation and the Functional Interconnection of Public and Private International Law August 3, 2026
  • Conflicts of jurisdiction in Senegal: lesson from the Senegalese Supreme Court on Lis Pendens and the Exequatur of foreign judgments July 27, 2026
  • Adoption in the proposal for a European Parenthood Regulation July 21, 2026
  • Copyright, Targeting and Geo-Blocking: The CJEU Stirs the Pot July 15, 2026
  • A Follow-Up: The German Judges Association’s Response to the HCCH Draft Text of a Future Convention on Parallel Proceedings and Related Actions July 15, 2026
  • Private International Law Dimensions of Singapore’s New Legislation to Combat Online Harms July 14, 2026
  • The 1961 HCCH Apostille Convention: Why All African Countries Should Ratify It? — Insights from Judicial Practice in Africa July 14, 2026
  • The enforcement of an advance on costs for substitute performance at the expense of a Russian debtor in German-French legal relations July 2, 2026
  • “Yes, in principle, but not quite there yet…” – Some Observations on the Public Consultation on the HCCH Draft Text of a Future Convention on Parallel Proceedings and Related Actions June 29, 2026
  • Judgment Mobility Rules in India’s Private International Law Regime: No place for a revision au fond? June 26, 2026
Link to: Aussie Analysis Link to: Aussie Analysis Aussie Analysis Link to: 3rd International Moot Competition on Maritime Arbitration Link to: 3rd International Moot Competition on Maritime Arbitration 3rd International Moot Competition on Maritime Arbitration
Scroll to top Scroll to top Scroll to top