Conflict of Laws
  • About
  • Editorial board
  • Subscription
  • Submission
  • Materials
  • Contact
  • Click to open the search input field Click to open the search input field Search
  • Menu Menu

Italian Forum on the Brussels I Review Proposal

January 24, 2011/1 Comment/in /by Gilles Cuniberti
image_pdfimage_print

The Italian Society of International Law is currently holding a Forum on the Brussels I Review Proposal.

The Forum offers contributions of Italian scholars on the Proposal, in Italian. So far, two have been posted:

  • Pietro Franzina, La garanzia dell’osservanza delle regole sulla competenza giurisdizionale nella proposta di revisione del regolamento “Bruxelles I”
  • Antonio Leandro, La proposta per la riforma del regolamento “Bruxelles I” e l’arbitrato
Share this entry
  • Share on Facebook
  • Share on X
  • Share on WhatsApp
  • Share on Pinterest
  • Share on LinkedIn
  • Share on Tumblr
  • Share on Vk
  • Share on Reddit
  • Share by Mail
https://conflictoflaws.net/News/2020/08/CoL_Banner-1.png 0 0 Gilles Cuniberti https://conflictoflaws.net/News/2020/08/CoL_Banner-1.png Gilles Cuniberti2011-01-24 15:56:472011-01-24 16:00:18Italian Forum on the Brussels I Review Proposal
1 reply
  1. Fabrizio Marongiu Buonaiuti says:
    January 31, 2011 at 11:31 am

    Many thanks for giving notice of our Forum.

    For anybody who might be interested, a further comment has been added concerning the amendments contained in the Commission’s Proposal in respect of lis pendens and related actions:

    Fabrizio Marongiu Buonaiuti, Litispendenza e connessione nella proposta di revisione del regolamento n. 44/2001.

Comments are closed.

Categories

  • Views
  • News

Most Recent Posts

  • Support in cross-border transactions by Adults: Contract law vs capacity law August 12, 2026
  • Recognition of Italian Extrajudicial Divorces in Tunisia — Between Methodological Uncertainty and the Need to Preserve Continuity of Personal Status Across Borders August 9, 2026
  • Private International Law and European Society August 4, 2026
  • The New Zealand Supreme Court’s judgment in Kea Investments Ltd v Wikeley on anti-enforcement relief August 3, 2026
  • Beyond Domicile: The BHP Litigation and the Functional Interconnection of Public and Private International Law August 3, 2026
  • Conflicts of jurisdiction in Senegal: lesson from the Senegalese Supreme Court on Lis Pendens and the Exequatur of foreign judgments July 27, 2026
  • Adoption in the proposal for a European Parenthood Regulation July 21, 2026
  • Copyright, Targeting and Geo-Blocking: The CJEU Stirs the Pot July 15, 2026
  • A Follow-Up: The German Judges Association’s Response to the HCCH Draft Text of a Future Convention on Parallel Proceedings and Related Actions July 15, 2026
  • Private International Law Dimensions of Singapore’s New Legislation to Combat Online Harms July 14, 2026
  • The 1961 HCCH Apostille Convention: Why All African Countries Should Ratify It? — Insights from Judicial Practice in Africa July 14, 2026
  • The enforcement of an advance on costs for substitute performance at the expense of a Russian debtor in German-French legal relations July 2, 2026
  • “Yes, in principle, but not quite there yet…” – Some Observations on the Public Consultation on the HCCH Draft Text of a Future Convention on Parallel Proceedings and Related Actions June 29, 2026
  • Judgment Mobility Rules in India’s Private International Law Regime: No place for a revision au fond? June 26, 2026
  • Nothing to See Here: The CJEU’s Decision in Case C-232/25 Idzinski June 18, 2026
Link to: Publication: Liber Amicorum Bernardo Cremades Link to: Publication: Liber Amicorum Bernardo Cremades Publication: Liber Amicorum Bernardo Cremades Link to: O’Hara and Ribstein on Conflict Rules and Global Competition Link to: O’Hara and Ribstein on Conflict Rules and Global Competition O’Hara and Ribstein on Conflict Rules and Global Competition
Scroll to top Scroll to top Scroll to top