Conflict of Laws
  • About
  • Editorial board
  • Subscription
  • Submission
  • Materials
  • Contact
  • Click to open the search input field Click to open the search input field Search
  • Menu Menu

European Parliament Workshop on Brussels I Reform

September 20, 2011/4 Comments/in /by Gilles Cuniberti
image_pdfimage_print

A session of the Committee of Legal Affairs on the Brussels I Reform took place today and lasted a bit more than an hour.

Speakers included A. Layton, A. Dickinson, I. Pretelli, F. Horn and A Nuyts.

The video of the meeting is available here.

UPDATE: The original workshop should be rescheduled, and the papers made available on the site of the Parliament.

Share this entry
  • Share on Facebook
  • Share on X
  • Share on WhatsApp
  • Share on Pinterest
  • Share on LinkedIn
  • Share on Tumblr
  • Share on Vk
  • Share on Reddit
  • Share by Mail
https://conflictoflaws.net/News/2020/08/CoL_Banner-1.png 0 0 Gilles Cuniberti https://conflictoflaws.net/News/2020/08/CoL_Banner-1.png Gilles Cuniberti2011-09-20 15:47:082011-09-21 12:22:55European Parliament Workshop on Brussels I Reform
4 replies
  1. Burkhard Hess says:
    September 20, 2011 at 9:22 pm

    Seeing this livestream, I’m puzzeled. I was also at Brussels, but was informed that the event would not take place. Thus, I rearranged my travelling back to Germany. My friend and colleague T. Pfeiffer, a co-author of the Heidelberg Report, was at the same time in the building, but not informed about the hearing. I’m wondering how this “hearing” could proceed in this way. As far as I could see, there was no substantial audience of the Parliament’s Committee in the room.
    For the sake of completeness, I would like to urge the organisers to put at least the written submissions of the other experts at this website and at the pertinent site of the EU-Parliament.

    As far as the presentation was concernde, this morning was not a good event for European democracy and lawmaking,

    Sorry for this remark (but from a principal point of view)

    Burkhard Hess

  2. Gilles Cuniberti says:
    September 20, 2011 at 10:30 pm

    Burkhard,

    I was surprised not to see you or Thomas (or other announced speakers such as Horatia Muir Watt) in the video, and was wondering whether I was missing something.

    Quite clearly, something went completely wrong.

    Let us hope that the reason is only the very poor organization of the European Parliament and /or its Committee of Legal Affairs.

    Gilles

  3. Arnaud Nuyts says:
    September 21, 2011 at 7:05 am

    The event has indeed been cancelled (because of electrical problems caused by a fire the day before), but as some uninformed participants started to gather in the room the organizers decided at the last moment to hold an informal discussion. I understand that the formal workshop will be rescheduled for a later date.

  4. Florian Horn says:
    September 26, 2011 at 10:26 am

    And indeed it will most probably be set already for 4 October. The circumstances of the meeting were most unfortunate. and it will be good for the subject matter at stake to hold the full workshop in front of a larger auditorium and not just an informal meeting.

    (btw: all the written statements including the speakers that were not present were available at the meeting in print and will – to my knowledge – be published in electronic form on the website – hopefully soon)

    Florian Horn

Comments are closed.

Categories

  • Views
  • News

Most Recent Posts

  • Support in cross-border transactions by Adults: Contract law vs capacity law August 12, 2026
  • Recognition of Italian Extrajudicial Divorces in Tunisia — Between Methodological Uncertainty and the Need to Preserve Continuity of Personal Status Across Borders August 9, 2026
  • Private International Law and European Society August 4, 2026
  • The New Zealand Supreme Court’s judgment in Kea Investments Ltd v Wikeley on anti-enforcement relief August 3, 2026
  • Beyond Domicile: The BHP Litigation and the Functional Interconnection of Public and Private International Law August 3, 2026
  • Conflicts of jurisdiction in Senegal: lesson from the Senegalese Supreme Court on Lis Pendens and the Exequatur of foreign judgments July 27, 2026
  • Adoption in the proposal for a European Parenthood Regulation July 21, 2026
  • Copyright, Targeting and Geo-Blocking: The CJEU Stirs the Pot July 15, 2026
  • A Follow-Up: The German Judges Association’s Response to the HCCH Draft Text of a Future Convention on Parallel Proceedings and Related Actions July 15, 2026
  • Private International Law Dimensions of Singapore’s New Legislation to Combat Online Harms July 14, 2026
  • The 1961 HCCH Apostille Convention: Why All African Countries Should Ratify It? — Insights from Judicial Practice in Africa July 14, 2026
  • The enforcement of an advance on costs for substitute performance at the expense of a Russian debtor in German-French legal relations July 2, 2026
  • “Yes, in principle, but not quite there yet…” – Some Observations on the Public Consultation on the HCCH Draft Text of a Future Convention on Parallel Proceedings and Related Actions June 29, 2026
  • Judgment Mobility Rules in India’s Private International Law Regime: No place for a revision au fond? June 26, 2026
  • Nothing to See Here: The CJEU’s Decision in Case C-232/25 Idzinski June 18, 2026
Link to: Thirty-one publications on South African private international law 2008-2011 Link to: Thirty-one publications on South African private international law 2008-2011 Thirty-one publications on South African private international law 2008-201... Link to: Second Circuit Vacates Anti-Enforcement Injunction in Chevron Link to: Second Circuit Vacates Anti-Enforcement Injunction in Chevron Second Circuit Vacates Anti-Enforcement Injunction in Chevron
Scroll to top Scroll to top Scroll to top