Conflict of Laws
  • About
  • Editorial board
  • Subscription
  • Submission
  • Materials
  • Contact
  • Click to open the search input field Click to open the search input field Search
  • Menu Menu

Local languages in the European area of justice

May 19, 2010/5 Comments/in /by Marta Requejo
image_pdfimage_print

The Ministry of Justice of France  has warned the General Council of the Spanish Judiciary on the bad practices of some Catalonian judges and magistrates, who send their resolutions to their French colleagues written in Catalan. France has raised a complaint to the CGPJ, which in turn has sent a letter to the president of the Superior Court of Justice of Catalonia,  reminding that France will only accept foreing judicial communications in French, English, Italian, German or Spanish, and “do not accept any other language.”

The CGPJ  explains the case of a Court of Cassa de la Selva (Girona), which sent a letter of request to the neighboring country drafted exclusively in Catalan. In the CGPJ’s opinion, this attitude amounts to a violation of the rules of linguistic uses. The CGPJ also points out that European countries have the power to decide which foreign languages other than their own they accept for judicial documents to be referred to them. It also notes that the French Huissiers de Justice are annoyed by the frequent use of Catalan in the forms and letters sent by Catalan courts.

According to a  journalist point of view (see El Mundo, 17.05.2010),  this approach of the judiciary may be influenced by the fact that both Catalonian police and justice are instructed to prioritize the Catalan language in their writings. In case their documents have to be sent to another Spanish court outside Catalonia, they must be translated. This obligation can not be extrapolated to countries where the language of communication is not recognized as official.

The CGPJ has urged Catalonian judges not to send more documents written in Catalan to the neighboring country.

Share this entry
  • Share on Facebook
  • Share on X
  • Share on WhatsApp
  • Share on Pinterest
  • Share on LinkedIn
  • Share on Tumblr
  • Share on Vk
  • Share on Reddit
  • Share by Mail
https://conflictoflaws.net/News/2020/08/CoL_Banner-1.png 0 0 Marta Requejo https://conflictoflaws.net/News/2020/08/CoL_Banner-1.png Marta Requejo2010-05-19 00:50:372010-05-19 07:46:42Local languages in the European area of justice
5 replies
  1. Gilles Cuniberti says:
    May 19, 2010 at 9:22 am

    Marta,

    very interesting post. I am surprised to hear that French authorities would actually understand even Spanish!

    On a more serious note, I wonder this: if a Catalonian judge sends a request to a French authority, this must be because he needs the input of that French authority. So it seems to me that it should be in his own interest to write the request in a language which is likely to be understood by the French authority. What kind of game is he playing at writing a request in a language nobody understands? He just does not care for the answer?

  2. Marta Requejo says:
    May 19, 2010 at 9:50 am

    The use of language (languages) in Spain is a very complex and highly politicized issue … when, in my view, as you say, practical considerations should prevail!

  3. Gordon Keck-O says:
    May 20, 2010 at 7:29 am

    The judge probably considers that judgments in Catalan are easier to decipher for a French judge than a decision in Spanish. After all, Catalan is much closer to French than Spanish is, sharing pronouns, vocabulary and grammatical rules that are absent in Spanish.

    It’s not my intention to support the judge’s action, but there appears to be a certain rationale behind it all (no matter how questionable it might be in strictly legal terms).

  4. Marta Requejo says:
    May 20, 2010 at 7:53 am

    It seems to me that’s an overly optimistic opinion. And, anyway, if what you are looking for is a language that ensures understanding of the receptor, the logical thing to do is to use his own language, or one that he has established as eligible.

  5. Laura Carballo Piñeiro says:
    May 20, 2010 at 10:20 am

    Regarding to the journalist’s point of view, I would like to remind that, besides Spanish rules on the use of official languages by the justice, Spain has signed the European Chapter of Regional or Minority Languages, with binding dispositions on this issue as well (which are also applicable to non official languages in Spain).

Comments are closed.

Categories

  • Views
  • News

Most Recent Posts

  • Private International Law and European Society August 4, 2026
  • The New Zealand Supreme Court’s judgment in Kea Investments Ltd v Wikeley on anti-enforcement relief August 3, 2026
  • Beyond Domicile: The BHP Litigation and the Functional Interconnection of Public and Private International Law August 3, 2026
  • Conflicts of jurisdiction in Senegal: lesson from the Senegalese Supreme Court on Lis Pendens and the Exequatur of foreign judgments July 27, 2026
  • Adoption in the proposal for a European Parenthood Regulation July 21, 2026
  • Copyright, Targeting and Geo-Blocking: The CJEU Stirs the Pot July 15, 2026
  • A Follow-Up: The German Judges Association’s Response to the HCCH Draft Text of a Future Convention on Parallel Proceedings and Related Actions July 15, 2026
  • Private International Law Dimensions of Singapore’s New Legislation to Combat Online Harms July 14, 2026
  • The 1961 HCCH Apostille Convention: Why All African Countries Should Ratify It? — Insights from Judicial Practice in Africa July 14, 2026
  • The enforcement of an advance on costs for substitute performance at the expense of a Russian debtor in German-French legal relations July 2, 2026
  • “Yes, in principle, but not quite there yet…” – Some Observations on the Public Consultation on the HCCH Draft Text of a Future Convention on Parallel Proceedings and Related Actions June 29, 2026
  • Judgment Mobility Rules in India’s Private International Law Regime: No place for a revision au fond? June 26, 2026
  • Nothing to See Here: The CJEU’s Decision in Case C-232/25 Idzinski June 18, 2026
  • Refusal to Enforce in Egypt of a Californian (U.S.) Judgment for Lack of Reciprocity: What Has Gotten into the Egyptian Supreme Court? June 15, 2026
  • PRC Double Interest neither Double nor Penal: Australian Courts Clear Its Name When Enforcing Chinese Judgments June 10, 2026
Link to: Abbott v. Abbott: A Ne Exeat Right is a “Right of Custody” Under the Hague Abduction Convention Link to: Abbott v. Abbott: A Ne Exeat Right is a “Right of Custody” Under the Hague Abduction Convention Abbott v. Abbott: A Ne Exeat Right is a “Right of Custody” Under the Hague... Link to: Forum on the electronic Apostille Pilot Program, Madrid 2010 Link to: Forum on the electronic Apostille Pilot Program, Madrid 2010 Forum on the electronic Apostille Pilot Program, Madrid 2010
Scroll to top Scroll to top Scroll to top