Conflict of Laws
  • About
  • Editorial board
  • Subscription
  • Submission
  • Materials
  • Contact
  • Click to open the search input field Click to open the search input field Search
  • Menu Menu

Conference in Oslo – Choice of law on arbitration

April 29, 2010/1 Comment/in /by Andrew Dickinson
image_pdfimage_print

A conference followed by a seminar on choice of law clauses and arbitration will take place next week in Oslo on Tuesday 6 and Friday 7 May.

The conference is organised by a research project run by prof. Giuditta Cordero Moss (Oslo) at the Oslo university on the impact of choice of law on arbitration and by the Norwegian committee of the ICC (more information on the project: here).

Here is the program of the conference (Thursday 6 May):

09.00-09.10 Welcome – Professor Kristin Normann, Selmer Lawfi rm, Oslo

Part 1: Arbitration law, its developments and its signifi cance for International disputes

09.10-09.25 Introduction: Why national law for international arbitration? –
Professor Giuditta Cordero, Moss, University of Oslo

09.25-09.45 International Arbitration and the impact of the national law of the place of arbitration –
Professor Luca Radicati di Brozolo, Catholic University, Milan, Partner, Bonelli Erede Pappalardo, Milan

09.45-10.05 International Commercial Arbitration in the Us: The Restatement –
Professor George Bermann, Columbia University, New York, Chief Reporter on the ALI Restatement of the US Law on International Commercial Arbitration

10.05-10.25 New Trends in International Commercial Arbitration in Latin America –
Professor Diego Fernandez Arroyo, Complutense University, Madrid

Part 2: Ad hoc or institutional arbitration?

10.45-11.05 Ad hoc arbitration v. institutional arbitration –
Ms Carita Wallgren-Linholm, Partner, Lindholm Wallgren, Helsinki

11.05-11.25 New Trends in ad hoc international commercial arbitration: the UNCITRAL Arbitration Rules –
Ms Corinne Montineri, Legal Offi cer, UNCITRAL, and Secretary, UNCITRAL Working Group II on Arbitration

11.25-12.15 Discussion on Part 1 and Part 2

12.15-13.15 Lunch

Part 3: Features of selected Arbitration Institutions

13.15-13.35 Arbitration under the Rules of the International Chamber of Commerce
Dr. Anders Ryssdal, Partner, Wiersholm Lawfi rm, Oslo, chairman of the Norwegian Committee,
International Chamber of Commerce

13.35-13.55 Arbitration in London: Features of the London Court of International Arbitration –
Mr Matthew Saunders, Partner, DLAPiper London

13.55-14.15 Arbitration under the Swiss Rules –Dr. Daniel Wehrli, Partner, Gloor & Sieger, Zürich,
Member of the Board, Swiss Arbitration Association

14.45-15.05 Arbitration in Sweden: Features of the Stockholm Rules – Marie Öhrström,
Associate and Business Development Lawyer, Setterwalls Lawfi rm, Stockholm, and previously Deputy Secretary General of the Arbitration Institute of the Stockholm Chamber of Commerce (SCC).

15.05-15.25 Arbitration in Finland: Features of the Central Chamber of Commerce of Finland –
Justice Gustaf Möller, Partner, Krogerus Attroneys Ltd, Chairman of the Board, Arbitration Institute, CCCF

15.25-15.45 Arbitration in Denmark: Features – Mr Georg Lett, Partner, Lett Law firm, Copenhagen

15.45-16.05 Arbitration in the Oslo Chamber of Commerce –
Mr Stephen Knudtzon, Partner, Thommessen Law f rm, Oslo, Member of the Board, Arbitration Institute of the Oslo Chamber of Commerce

16.05-16.45 Discussion

16.45-17.00 Final observations – Professor Giuditta Cordero Moss, University of Oslo
The conference will be followed by a seminar on Friday 7 May for the project participants.

Share this entry
  • Share on Facebook
  • Share on X
  • Share on WhatsApp
  • Share on Pinterest
  • Share on LinkedIn
  • Share on Tumblr
  • Share on Vk
  • Share on Reddit
  • Share by Mail
https://conflictoflaws.net/News/2020/08/CoL_Banner-1.png 0 0 Andrew Dickinson https://conflictoflaws.net/News/2020/08/CoL_Banner-1.png Andrew Dickinson2010-04-29 12:32:162010-04-29 12:32:16Conference in Oslo – Choice of law on arbitration
1 reply
  1. Agbai-Eleanya & Associates (Barristers & Solicitors) says:
    June 2, 2010 at 6:29 am

    Please, kindly include us in mailing list.

Comments are closed.

Categories

  • Views
  • News

Most Recent Posts

  • The Demise of the Lex Domicilii Matrimonii in South African Private International Law August 18, 2026
  • Support in cross-border transactions by Adults: Contract law vs capacity law August 12, 2026
  • Recognition of Italian Extrajudicial Divorces in Tunisia — Between Methodological Uncertainty and the Need to Preserve Continuity of Personal Status Across Borders August 9, 2026
  • Private International Law and European Society August 4, 2026
  • The New Zealand Supreme Court’s judgment in Kea Investments Ltd v Wikeley on anti-enforcement relief August 3, 2026
  • Beyond Domicile: The BHP Litigation and the Functional Interconnection of Public and Private International Law August 3, 2026
  • Conflicts of jurisdiction in Senegal: lesson from the Senegalese Supreme Court on Lis Pendens and the Exequatur of foreign judgments July 27, 2026
  • Adoption in the proposal for a European Parenthood Regulation July 21, 2026
  • Copyright, Targeting and Geo-Blocking: The CJEU Stirs the Pot July 15, 2026
  • A Follow-Up: The German Judges Association’s Response to the HCCH Draft Text of a Future Convention on Parallel Proceedings and Related Actions July 15, 2026
  • Private International Law Dimensions of Singapore’s New Legislation to Combat Online Harms July 14, 2026
  • The 1961 HCCH Apostille Convention: Why All African Countries Should Ratify It? — Insights from Judicial Practice in Africa July 14, 2026
  • The enforcement of an advance on costs for substitute performance at the expense of a Russian debtor in German-French legal relations July 2, 2026
  • “Yes, in principle, but not quite there yet…” – Some Observations on the Public Consultation on the HCCH Draft Text of a Future Convention on Parallel Proceedings and Related Actions June 29, 2026
  • Judgment Mobility Rules in India’s Private International Law Regime: No place for a revision au fond? June 26, 2026
Link to: The New Chinese Tort Law: Conflict Rules on Tort Untouched Link to: The New Chinese Tort Law: Conflict Rules on Tort Untouched The New Chinese Tort Law: Conflict Rules on Tort Untouched Link to: Mari and Pretelli on Choice-of-Court Agreements, Lis Pendens and Torpedo Actions Link to: Mari and Pretelli on Choice-of-Court Agreements, Lis Pendens and Torpedo Actions Mari and Pretelli on Choice-of-Court Agreements, Lis Pendens and Torpedo Ac...
Scroll to top Scroll to top Scroll to top