Conflict of Laws
  • About
  • Editorial board
  • Subscription
  • Submission
  • Materials
  • Contact
  • Click to open the search input field Click to open the search input field Search
  • Menu Menu

Spanish homosexual couple and surrogate pregnancy

November 29, 2008/6 Comments/in /by Marta Requejo
image_pdfimage_print

While some countries, like the U.S.A., accept surrogate pregnancy among permitted techniques of assisted reproduction, Spanish law considers it illegal. That is why a certificate issued in the U.S.A. establishing the parenthood of a baby born in this country to a surrogate mother would not be registered in Spain; accordingly the baby would not have Spanish nationality; and consequently, he would need a visa to come to Spain.

This apparently neutral facts may not describe a theoretical situation but correspond whit a quite real one. A Spanish homosexual married couple from Valencia decided to try surrogate pregnancy after several failed attempts of international adoption; as for a national adoption, they feared they would not be awarded the “certificado de idoneidad” due to their homosexual condition. They therefore moved to the USA looking for better chances. Today, the intended parents and (their?) two twin babies born in the USA to a surrogate mother are the major figures of a complicated situation. The couple is in the U.S. since the Spanish embassy has denied the babies the visa to enter Spain. So far, the twins bear American nationality to prevent them from being stateless.

According to press reports, the couple has ruled out the option of returning to Spain by registering the babies as born to a Spanish female mother; they want them to be acknowledged as their children, and them to be granted the Spanish nationality. Faced with the Spanish refusal they might decide to remain (to exile?) in the U.S.A., where they have been offered a residence permit. They have warned the Spanish government that they will start a legal battle both in the U.S.A. and before the European Court of Human Rights, claiming violation of the Declaration of the Rights of the Child. Considering the importance of their aim, how much it is worth; but also knowing how exhausting such processes will be, we can only wish them courage and luck.

Share this entry
  • Share on Facebook
  • Share on X
  • Share on WhatsApp
  • Share on Pinterest
  • Share on LinkedIn
  • Share on Tumblr
  • Share on Vk
  • Share on Reddit
  • Share by Mail
https://conflictoflaws.net/News/2020/08/CoL_Banner-1.png 0 0 Marta Requejo https://conflictoflaws.net/News/2020/08/CoL_Banner-1.png Marta Requejo2008-11-29 19:46:212008-11-30 10:54:27Spanish homosexual couple and surrogate pregnancy
6 replies
  1. Marcin Tustin says:
    November 29, 2008 at 8:47 pm

    Is the mother shown on the birth certificate? Or more pertinently, would a heterosexual couple be able to put their names alone on the birth certificate? If so, this is a rule that in practice discriminates against homosexuals.

  2. M S de Bruin says:
    November 30, 2008 at 10:20 am

    Marta,
    I am curious – What is the status or legal relationship between the homosexual couple and the children under US law? I presume that some form of legally binding document was signed by the parties in the US?

    Michelle.

  3. Gilles Cuniberti says:
    November 30, 2008 at 10:37 am

    I reported earlier on a similar French case. The babies had come back to France on a U.S. passport.

    The Paris Court of Appeal eventually recognised the birth certificates.

    https://conflictoflaws.de/2007/cases/flying-to-california-to-bypass-the-french-ban-on-surrogacy-update/

  4. Sinibaldus Fliskus says:
    December 7, 2008 at 1:25 pm

    News are coming in a few days. I wish the Spanish Autorities might consider the possibility of recognizing the Californian birth certificate on the basis of “the interest of the child” as stated in article 3rd of the Convention on the Rights of the Child NY 20th november 1989. Let’s remember: “1. In all actions concerning children, whether undertaken by public or private social welfare institutions, courts of law, administrative authorities or legislative bodies, the best interests of the child shall be a primary consideration”. This provision should be regarded as an important element of Spanish Public Policy which might operate to allow the legal effects of the California birth certificate in Spain. We shall see….

  5. Denise Grady says:
    December 10, 2008 at 9:17 pm

    To Marta Requejo: How can I reach you, please? I am a writer at the New York Times.
    Sending this msg. Wed. 10 Dec. 2008.
    Thank you.
    grady@nytimes.com

  6. Sinibaldus Fliskus says:
    March 9, 2009 at 7:45 pm

    According to my Spanish friends, the Spanish Direccion General de Registros would have released its decision accepting the application. Hence the twin babies would be considered as legal sons of the same-sex spouses. To be confirmed, anyway…

Comments are closed.

Categories

  • Views
  • News

Most Recent Posts

  • Support in cross-border transactions by Adults: Contract law vs capacity law August 12, 2026
  • Recognition of Italian Extrajudicial Divorces in Tunisia — Between Methodological Uncertainty and the Need to Preserve Continuity of Personal Status Across Borders August 9, 2026
  • Private International Law and European Society August 4, 2026
  • The New Zealand Supreme Court’s judgment in Kea Investments Ltd v Wikeley on anti-enforcement relief August 3, 2026
  • Beyond Domicile: The BHP Litigation and the Functional Interconnection of Public and Private International Law August 3, 2026
  • Conflicts of jurisdiction in Senegal: lesson from the Senegalese Supreme Court on Lis Pendens and the Exequatur of foreign judgments July 27, 2026
  • Adoption in the proposal for a European Parenthood Regulation July 21, 2026
  • Copyright, Targeting and Geo-Blocking: The CJEU Stirs the Pot July 15, 2026
  • A Follow-Up: The German Judges Association’s Response to the HCCH Draft Text of a Future Convention on Parallel Proceedings and Related Actions July 15, 2026
  • Private International Law Dimensions of Singapore’s New Legislation to Combat Online Harms July 14, 2026
  • The 1961 HCCH Apostille Convention: Why All African Countries Should Ratify It? — Insights from Judicial Practice in Africa July 14, 2026
  • The enforcement of an advance on costs for substitute performance at the expense of a Russian debtor in German-French legal relations July 2, 2026
  • “Yes, in principle, but not quite there yet…” – Some Observations on the Public Consultation on the HCCH Draft Text of a Future Convention on Parallel Proceedings and Related Actions June 29, 2026
  • Judgment Mobility Rules in India’s Private International Law Regime: No place for a revision au fond? June 26, 2026
  • Nothing to See Here: The CJEU’s Decision in Case C-232/25 Idzinski June 18, 2026
Link to: Cross-Border Consumer Disputes in Victoria Link to: Cross-Border Consumer Disputes in Victoria Cross-Border Consumer Disputes in Victoria Link to: Weighing Disputed Facts in Forum Non Conveniens Motions Link to: Weighing Disputed Facts in Forum Non Conveniens Motions Weighing Disputed Facts in Forum Non Conveniens Motions
Scroll to top Scroll to top Scroll to top