Conflict of Laws
  • About
  • Editorial board
  • Subscription
  • Submission
  • Materials
  • Contact
  • Click to open the search input field Click to open the search input field Search
  • Menu Menu

Council Meeting on Rome I: A Live Webcast

November 30, 2006/in /by Martin George
image_pdfimage_print

The Council of the European Union (Justice and Home Affairs) will hold their 2768th meeting on Monday 4th – Tuesday 5th December 2006. Item 4 on the agenda is:

Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on the law applicable to contractual obligations (Rome I) (debate on certain issues) (LA) (public deliberation)

Thanks to the wonder of modern technology, that public deliberation should be available to watch as a live webcast on the Finnish Presidency’s website. You will need to download and install RealPlayer, if you don’t already have it. The website contains archives of the webcasts, so those that are busy on 4th – 5th December will be able to watch it after the event; we will link to the specific webcast when it becomes available.

Update: it seems as though the version of the agenda on the Finnish Presidency’s website may now be a little out of date. The press office at the Council of the European Union have produced a a new version of the agenda today (1st December 2006), and it makes no mention of Rome I. We will keep you informed of further developments.

Share this entry
  • Share on Facebook
  • Share on X
  • Share on WhatsApp
  • Share on Pinterest
  • Share on LinkedIn
  • Share on Tumblr
  • Share on Vk
  • Share on Reddit
  • Share by Mail
https://conflictoflaws.net/News/2020/08/CoL_Banner-1.png 0 0 Martin George https://conflictoflaws.net/News/2020/08/CoL_Banner-1.png Martin George2006-11-30 14:54:152006-12-01 12:00:08Council Meeting on Rome I: A Live Webcast

Categories

  • Views
  • News

Most Recent Posts

  • Conflicts of jurisdiction in Senegal: lesson from the Senegalese Supreme Court on Lis Pendens and the Exequatur of foreign judgments July 27, 2026
  • Adoption in the proposal for a European Parenthood Regulation July 21, 2026
  • Copyright, Targeting and Geo-Blocking: The CJEU Stirs the Pot July 15, 2026
  • A Follow-Up: The German Judges Association’s Response to the HCCH Draft Text of a Future Convention on Parallel Proceedings and Related Actions July 15, 2026
  • Private International Law Dimensions of Singapore’s New Legislation to Combat Online Harms July 14, 2026
  • The 1961 HCCH Apostille Convention: Why All African Countries Should Ratify It? — Insights from Judicial Practice in Africa July 14, 2026
  • The enforcement of an advance on costs for substitute performance at the expense of a Russian debtor in German-French legal relations July 2, 2026
  • “Yes, in principle, but not quite there yet…” – Some Observations on the Public Consultation on the HCCH Draft Text of a Future Convention on Parallel Proceedings and Related Actions June 29, 2026
  • Judgment Mobility Rules in India’s Private International Law Regime: No place for a revision au fond? June 26, 2026
  • Nothing to See Here: The CJEU’s Decision in Case C-232/25 Idzinski June 18, 2026
  • Refusal to Enforce in Egypt of a Californian (U.S.) Judgment for Lack of Reciprocity: What Has Gotten into the Egyptian Supreme Court? June 15, 2026
  • PRC Double Interest neither Double nor Penal: Australian Courts Clear Its Name When Enforcing Chinese Judgments June 10, 2026
  • The AIFC Court, Gazprom v Naftogaz and the Emergence of a New Conduit Jurisdiction Debate June 6, 2026
  • Montana Supreme Court Decides International Child Custody Case June 3, 2026
  • China’s Countering Improper Foreign Extraterritorial Jurisdiction Regulation Blocked EU’s Extraterritorial Data Acquisition May 29, 2026
Link to: Finnish EU Presidency calls for Streamlining of Instruments in the Field of Civil Procedural Law Link to: Finnish EU Presidency calls for Streamlining of Instruments in the Field of Civil Procedural Law Finnish EU Presidency calls for Streamlining of Instruments in the Field of... Link to: Norwegian Supreme Court on the Lugano Convention Art 5.1. Link to: Norwegian Supreme Court on the Lugano Convention Art 5.1. Norwegian Supreme Court on the Lugano Convention Art 5.1.
Scroll to top Scroll to top Scroll to top