Conflict of Laws
  • About
  • Editorial board
  • Subscription
  • Submission
  • Materials
  • Contact
  • Click to open the search input field Click to open the search input field Search
  • Menu Menu

Another Step Forward: Recognition of Non-Monetary Orders in Ontario

October 24, 2006/3 Comments/in /by Stephen Pitel
image_pdfimage_print

The courts of Ontario have taken another step forward in the recognition and enforcement of foreign non-monetary orders.  In Re Grace Canada Inc. (available here) the Superior Court of Justice recognized a Manitoba order which had allowed a law firm to act in a particular matter by finding it was not in a conflict of interest.  Grace Canada Inc. had opposed recognition on the basis that the Manitoba order was non-monetary.  The Superior Court of Justice relied on two earlier recent Court of Appeal for Ontario decisions supporting the recognition of non-monetary orders: Re Cavell Insurance Co. (available here) and Pro-Swing v. ELTA Golf Inc. (available here).  An appeal of the latter decision was heard by the Supreme Court of Canada in December 2005 and a decision is eagerly awaited.

Share this entry
  • Share on Facebook
  • Share on X
  • Share on WhatsApp
  • Share on Pinterest
  • Share on LinkedIn
  • Share on Tumblr
  • Share on Vk
  • Share on Reddit
  • Share by Mail
https://conflictoflaws.net/News/2020/08/CoL_Banner-1.png 0 0 Stephen Pitel https://conflictoflaws.net/News/2020/08/CoL_Banner-1.png Stephen Pitel2006-10-24 14:00:142006-11-25 15:04:09Another Step Forward: Recognition of Non-Monetary Orders in Ontario
3 replies
  1. Richard F Oppong says:
    October 25, 2006 at 2:55 pm

    This is an interesting addition to what is an emerging area of law in Canada. For those interested please see this article of mine in the recent issue of the UBC Law Review: ‘Enforcing Foreign Non-Money Judgments: Some Recent Developments in Canada and Beyond’ (2006) 39 University of British Columbia Law Review 257-286

  2. Antonin I. Pribetic says:
    November 14, 2006 at 11:59 pm

    The Supreme Court of Canada’s decision in Pro Swing v. Elta Golf Inc. will be released on Friday, November 17, 2006 at 9:45 a.m. See http://scc.lexum.umontreal.ca/en/news_release/2006/06-11-14.2/06-11-14.2.html

    Antonin I. Pribetic
    Steinberg Morton Hope & Israel LLP

  3. Stephen G.A. Pitel says:
    November 16, 2006 at 11:13 am

    Thanks for these additional related news items. The Canadian conflict of laws community eagerly awaits the SCC decision in ProSwing this Friday.

    Stephen

Comments are closed.

Categories

  • Views
  • News

Most Recent Posts

  • Conflicts of jurisdiction in Senegal: lesson from the Senegalese Supreme Court on Lis Pendens and the Exequatur of foreign judgments July 27, 2026
  • Adoption in the proposal for a European Parenthood Regulation July 21, 2026
  • Copyright, Targeting and Geo-Blocking: The CJEU Stirs the Pot July 15, 2026
  • A Follow-Up: The German Judges Association’s Response to the HCCH Draft Text of a Future Convention on Parallel Proceedings and Related Actions July 15, 2026
  • Private International Law Dimensions of Singapore’s New Legislation to Combat Online Harms July 14, 2026
  • The 1961 HCCH Apostille Convention: Why All African Countries Should Ratify It? — Insights from Judicial Practice in Africa July 14, 2026
  • The enforcement of an advance on costs for substitute performance at the expense of a Russian debtor in German-French legal relations July 2, 2026
  • “Yes, in principle, but not quite there yet…” – Some Observations on the Public Consultation on the HCCH Draft Text of a Future Convention on Parallel Proceedings and Related Actions June 29, 2026
  • Judgment Mobility Rules in India’s Private International Law Regime: No place for a revision au fond? June 26, 2026
  • Nothing to See Here: The CJEU’s Decision in Case C-232/25 Idzinski June 18, 2026
  • Refusal to Enforce in Egypt of a Californian (U.S.) Judgment for Lack of Reciprocity: What Has Gotten into the Egyptian Supreme Court? June 15, 2026
  • PRC Double Interest neither Double nor Penal: Australian Courts Clear Its Name When Enforcing Chinese Judgments June 10, 2026
  • The AIFC Court, Gazprom v Naftogaz and the Emergence of a New Conduit Jurisdiction Debate June 6, 2026
  • Montana Supreme Court Decides International Child Custody Case June 3, 2026
  • China’s Countering Improper Foreign Extraterritorial Jurisdiction Regulation Blocked EU’s Extraterritorial Data Acquisition May 29, 2026
Link to: Conference: The Evolving World of International Law Link to: Conference: The Evolving World of International Law Conference: The Evolving World of International Law Link to: United States Supreme Court to Consider Constitutionality of Punitive Damage Award Link to: United States Supreme Court to Consider Constitutionality of Punitive Damage Award United States Supreme Court to Consider Constitutionality of Punitive Damage...
Scroll to top Scroll to top Scroll to top