Conflict of Laws
  • About
  • Editorial board
  • Subscription
  • Submission
  • Materials
  • Contact
  • Click to open the search input field Click to open the search input field Search
  • Menu Menu

Rome I: Commission’s Opinion on the Opting-In by the UK

November 15, 2008/in /by Giorgio Buono
image_pdfimage_print

Following the formal notification of 24 July 2008 by the United Kingdom of its wish to participate in Reg. No 593/2008 (Rome I), the Commission has expressed its opinion – doc. COM 2008(730) fin. of 7 November 2008 – pursuant to the procedure set out in Art. 11a TEC (former Art. 11(3) TEC, which is made applicable to the opting-in procedure, mutatis mutandis, by Art. 4 of the Protocol on the Position of UK and Ireland). Here’s the conclusion:

The Commission welcomes the request from the United Kingdom to accept Regulation 593/2008 which is a central element of the Community acquis in the area of civil justice. It therefore gives a positive opinion on the said participation.

The Regulation should enter into force for the United Kingdom on the day of the notification to the United Kingdom of the Commission’s decision on its request. As in the case of the other Member States, it should apply from 17 December 2009, except for Article 26 which should apply from 17 June 2009.

(Many thanks to Federico Garau, Conflictus Legum blog, for the tip-off)

Share this entry
  • Share on Facebook
  • Share on X
  • Share on WhatsApp
  • Share on Pinterest
  • Share on LinkedIn
  • Share on Tumblr
  • Share on Vk
  • Share on Reddit
  • Share by Mail
https://conflictoflaws.net/News/2020/08/CoL_Banner-1.png 0 0 Giorgio Buono https://conflictoflaws.net/News/2020/08/CoL_Banner-1.png Giorgio Buono2008-11-15 16:13:242008-11-16 11:38:20Rome I: Commission’s Opinion on the Opting-In by the UK

Categories

  • Views
  • News

Most Recent Posts

  • Conflicts of jurisdiction in Senegal: lesson from the Senegalese Supreme Court on Lis Pendens and the Exequatur of foreign judgments July 27, 2026
  • Adoption in the proposal for a European Parenthood Regulation July 21, 2026
  • Copyright, Targeting and Geo-Blocking: The CJEU Stirs the Pot July 15, 2026
  • A Follow-Up: The German Judges Association’s Response to the HCCH Draft Text of a Future Convention on Parallel Proceedings and Related Actions July 15, 2026
  • Private International Law Dimensions of Singapore’s New Legislation to Combat Online Harms July 14, 2026
  • The 1961 HCCH Apostille Convention: Why All African Countries Should Ratify It? — Insights from Judicial Practice in Africa July 14, 2026
  • The enforcement of an advance on costs for substitute performance at the expense of a Russian debtor in German-French legal relations July 2, 2026
  • “Yes, in principle, but not quite there yet…” – Some Observations on the Public Consultation on the HCCH Draft Text of a Future Convention on Parallel Proceedings and Related Actions June 29, 2026
  • Judgment Mobility Rules in India’s Private International Law Regime: No place for a revision au fond? June 26, 2026
  • Nothing to See Here: The CJEU’s Decision in Case C-232/25 Idzinski June 18, 2026
  • Refusal to Enforce in Egypt of a Californian (U.S.) Judgment for Lack of Reciprocity: What Has Gotten into the Egyptian Supreme Court? June 15, 2026
  • PRC Double Interest neither Double nor Penal: Australian Courts Clear Its Name When Enforcing Chinese Judgments June 10, 2026
  • The AIFC Court, Gazprom v Naftogaz and the Emergence of a New Conduit Jurisdiction Debate June 6, 2026
  • Montana Supreme Court Decides International Child Custody Case June 3, 2026
  • China’s Countering Improper Foreign Extraterritorial Jurisdiction Regulation Blocked EU’s Extraterritorial Data Acquisition May 29, 2026
Link to: New Service Regulation Applicable in EU – In Denmark, as well? Link to: New Service Regulation Applicable in EU – In Denmark, as well? New Service Regulation Applicable in EU – In Denmark, as well? Link to: New Service Regulation No 1393/2007 and Denmark (Update) Link to: New Service Regulation No 1393/2007 and Denmark (Update) New Service Regulation No 1393/2007 and Denmark (Update)
Scroll to top Scroll to top Scroll to top