Conflict of Laws
  • About
  • Editorial board
  • Subscription
  • Submission
  • Materials
  • Contact
  • Click to open the search input field Click to open the search input field Search
  • Menu Menu

New Service Regulation Applicable in EU – In Denmark, as well?

November 14, 2008/in /by Giorgio Buono
image_pdfimage_print

Starting from yesterday, 13 November 2008, new Regulation No 1393/2007 on the service in the Member States of judicial and extrajudicial documents in civil or commercial matters (see our previous posts here and here) is applicable in the Member States (see its Art. 26).

Pursuant to Art. 25 of the new Service Reg., “Regulation (EC) No 1348/2000 shall be repealed as from the date of application of this Regulation” and “[r]eferences made to the repealed Regulation shall be construed as being made to this Regulation and should be read in accordance with the correlation table in Annex III”.

While the new rules are applicable in the United Kingdom and Ireland, since these two States took part in the adoption of the Regulation (see Recital no 28), the position of Denmark appears at the moment quite controversial.

The latter State, as it is the rule in respect of measures taken under Title IV of the TEC, did not take part in the adoption of the new Service Regulation and “is not bound by it or subject to its application” (see Recital no 29). Nonetheless, in the two “parallel” agreements concluded between the European Community and the Kingdom of Denmark to extend to the latter the provisions of Reg. No 44/2001 and Reg. No 1348/2000, a simplified procedure was established in order to implement future amendments to such instruments also in respect of Denmark: according  to  Art.  3(2)  of  the  Agreement on the service of documents

Whenever  amendments  to  Council  Regulation  (EC)  No 1348/2000 are adopted, Denmark shall notify to the Commission of its decision whether or not to implement the content of such amendments. Notification  shall  be  given  at  the  time  of  the  adoption  of  the amendments or within 30 days thereafter.

As stated by this document available on the European Judicial Atlas in Civil Matters (emphasis added)

In  accordance  with  Article  3(2)  of  the  Agreement,  Denmark  has  by  letter  of  20  November 2007 notified the Commission of its decision to implement the contents of Regulation (EC) No  1393/2007.  In  accordance  with  Article  3(6)  of  the  Agreement,  the  Danish  notification creates  mutual  obligations  between  Denmark  and  the  Community.  Thus,  Regulation  (EC) 1393/2007 constitutes amendment to the Agreement and is considered annexed thereto.

In accordance with Article 3(4) of the Agreement, the necessary administrative measures will take effect on the date of entry into force of Regulation (EC) No 1393/2007.

Quite surprisingly, this important document seems not to have been published in the OJ; furthermore, the related pages of the European Judicial Atlas in English, French, Italian and German version are out-of-date, and contain no mention of it (while the Spanish one does, as pointed out by our friend Federico Garau over at the Conflictus Legum blog).

It is thus questionable whether, at the moment, the provisions of Reg. No 1393/2007 are applicable in Denmark (at least, if one refers to the official text of it). Any further information is welcome.

Share this entry
  • Share on Facebook
  • Share on X
  • Share on WhatsApp
  • Share on Pinterest
  • Share on LinkedIn
  • Share on Tumblr
  • Share on Vk
  • Share on Reddit
  • Share by Mail
https://conflictoflaws.net/News/2020/08/CoL_Banner-1.png 0 0 Giorgio Buono https://conflictoflaws.net/News/2020/08/CoL_Banner-1.png Giorgio Buono2008-11-14 17:18:292008-11-14 17:35:51New Service Regulation Applicable in EU – In Denmark, as well?

Categories

  • Views
  • News

Most Recent Posts

  • Conflicts of jurisdiction in Senegal: lesson from the Senegalese Supreme Court on Lis Pendens and the Exequatur of foreign judgments July 27, 2026
  • Adoption in the proposal for a European Parenthood Regulation July 21, 2026
  • Copyright, Targeting and Geo-Blocking: The CJEU Stirs the Pot July 15, 2026
  • A Follow-Up: The German Judges Association’s Response to the HCCH Draft Text of a Future Convention on Parallel Proceedings and Related Actions July 15, 2026
  • Private International Law Dimensions of Singapore’s New Legislation to Combat Online Harms July 14, 2026
  • The 1961 HCCH Apostille Convention: Why All African Countries Should Ratify It? — Insights from Judicial Practice in Africa July 14, 2026
  • The enforcement of an advance on costs for substitute performance at the expense of a Russian debtor in German-French legal relations July 2, 2026
  • “Yes, in principle, but not quite there yet…” – Some Observations on the Public Consultation on the HCCH Draft Text of a Future Convention on Parallel Proceedings and Related Actions June 29, 2026
  • Judgment Mobility Rules in India’s Private International Law Regime: No place for a revision au fond? June 26, 2026
  • Nothing to See Here: The CJEU’s Decision in Case C-232/25 Idzinski June 18, 2026
  • Refusal to Enforce in Egypt of a Californian (U.S.) Judgment for Lack of Reciprocity: What Has Gotten into the Egyptian Supreme Court? June 15, 2026
  • PRC Double Interest neither Double nor Penal: Australian Courts Clear Its Name When Enforcing Chinese Judgments June 10, 2026
  • The AIFC Court, Gazprom v Naftogaz and the Emergence of a New Conduit Jurisdiction Debate June 6, 2026
  • Montana Supreme Court Decides International Child Custody Case June 3, 2026
  • China’s Countering Improper Foreign Extraterritorial Jurisdiction Regulation Blocked EU’s Extraterritorial Data Acquisition May 29, 2026
Link to: Daimler Chrysler v Stolzenberg, Part 9: Luxembourg Link to: Daimler Chrysler v Stolzenberg, Part 9: Luxembourg Daimler Chrysler v Stolzenberg, Part 9: Luxembourg Link to: Rome I: Commission’s Opinion on the Opting-In by the UK Link to: Rome I: Commission’s Opinion on the Opting-In by the UK Rome I: Commission’s Opinion on the Opting-In by the UK
Scroll to top Scroll to top Scroll to top