Third Issue of 2013’s Rivista di diritto internazionale privato e processuale
(I am grateful to Prof. Francesca Villata – University of Milan – for the following presentation of the latest issue of the RDIPP) The third issue of 2013 of the
If you are not happy with the results below please do another search
(I am grateful to Prof. Francesca Villata – University of Milan – for the following presentation of the latest issue of the RDIPP) The third issue of 2013 of the
The Academy of European Law (ERA) and the Max Planck Institute Luxembourg will co-organize a conference on
The Lithuanian Supreme Court has made a preliminary reference to the Court of Justice of the European Union asking whether the Brussels Regime forbids the recognition of arbitral anti-suit injunctions. In this case, after one party initiated court proceedings in Lithuania, the other party commenced arbitral proceedings in Sweden. The arbitral tribunal found that the […]
The
Recently, the May/June issue of the German law journal “Praxis des Internationalen Privat- und Verfahrensrechts” (
Recently, the September/October issue of the German law journal “Praxis des Internationalen Privat- und Verfahrensrechts” (
Martin Illmer (Max Planck Institute for Comparative and PIL) has posted Brussels I and Arbitration Revisited – The European Commission’s Proposal COM(2010) 748 final on SSRN. The abstract reads:
In December 2010, the European Commission presented its long-awaited proposal for a reformed Brussels I Regulation. One of the cornerstones of the proposal is the interface between the Regulation and arbitration. In the first part, the article sets out the development of the exclusion of arbitration from the Regulation’s scope up to the West Tankers and National Navigation cases. In the second, main part, the author, who is a member of the Commission’s Expert Group on the arbitration interface, provides a detailed account and evaluation of the new lis pendens-mechanism established by the Commission proposal in order to effectively prevent parallel proceedings in the arbitration context. In the third, final part, the author scrutinizes the Commission proposal against the background of the Commission’s Impact Assessment before concluding with a short resumé.
The paper is forthcoming in the Rabels Zeitschrift für Ausländisches und Internationales Privatrecht.
On September 7th, the European Parliament adopted a
Recently, the September/October issue of the German law journal “Praxis des Internationalen Privat- und Verfahrensrechts” (
The XI volume (2009) of the Yearbook of Private International Law (YPIL), published by