Conflict of Laws
  • About
  • Editorial board
  • Subscription
  • Submission
  • Materials
  • Contact
  • Click to open the search input field Click to open the search input field Search
  • Menu Menu

About Veronika Gaertner

This author has not written his bio yet.
But we are proud to say that Veronika Gaertner contributed 220 entries already.

Entries by Veronika Gaertner

ECJ: Distinction between “Sale of Goods” and “Provision of Services” in Terms of Art. 5 (1) (b) Brussels I (Car Trim)

March 8, 2010/1 Comment/in /by Veronika Gaertner

On 25 February, the ECJ delivered its judgment in case

Latest Issue of “Praxis des Internationalen Privat- und Verfahrensrechts” (2/2010)

March 6, 2010/in /by Veronika Gaertner

Recently, the March/April issue of the German law journal “Praxis des Internationalen Privat- und Verfahrensrechts” (

Publication: Intellectual Property in the Conflict of Laws

February 19, 2010/1 Comment/in /by Veronika Gaertner

There is a new book on intellectual property and conflict of laws, written by Sierd J. Schaafsma: Here is the summary: The interface between intellectual property and conflict of laws is a notorious difficult subject. A recent study puts the subject in a new light. In his recently published book, Sierd J. Schaafsma deals with […]

International Conference in Verona

February 17, 2010/1 Comment/in /by Veronika Gaertner

The Verona University School of Law will host a conference titled Conflict of Laws in International Commercial Arbitration The conference will take place from 18-20 March 2010 in Verona and will cover in particular the following topics: conflict of law questions concerning arbitration agreements jurisdiction of arbitral tribunals the law applicable to the merits arbitration […]

German Judgment on Rome II

January 17, 2010/in /by Veronika Gaertner

Even though the decision is not really new anymore and the case has been discussed already – at least with regard to certain aspects concerning the temporal scope of Rome II – it might still be worth mentioning since it is the first judgment of the German Federal Court of Justice (Bundesgerichtshof, BGH) applying the […]

AG Opinion on Art. 5 No. 1 (b) Brussels I

January 16, 2010/in /by Veronika Gaertner

As pointed out already in the “asides category”, on 12 January 2010 AG Trstenjak’s opinion in case

Latest Issue of “Praxis des Internationalen Privat- und Verfahrensrechts” (1/2010)

January 13, 2010/in /by Veronika Gaertner

Recently, the January issue of the German law journal “Praxis des Internationalen Privat- und Verfahrensrechts” (

Recent ECJ Judgment and References on Brussels I and Brussels II bis

January 8, 2010/in /by Veronika Gaertner

I. Judgment on Brussels II bis On 23 December 2009, the ECJ delivered its judgment in case

Publication: Reithmann/Martiny: Internationales Vertragsrecht

December 23, 2009/in /by Veronika Gaertner

The 7th edition of the work Internationales Vertragsrecht edited by Christoph Reithmann and Dieter Martiny has recently been published. The new edition of this well-established book includes in particular the new Rome I Regulation (Regulation (EC) No. 593/2008) and the consequences resulting from the transformation of the Rome Convention into a Community Regulation and encompasses […]

Latest Issue of “Praxis des Internationalen Privat- und Verfahrensrechts” (6/2009)

November 28, 2009/1 Comment/in /by Veronika Gaertner

Recently, the November/December issue of the German law journal “Praxis des Internationalen Privat- und Verfahrensrechts” (

Page 6 of 22«‹45678›»

Categories

  • Views
  • News

Most Recent Posts

  • The New Zealand Supreme Court’s judgment in Kea Investments Ltd v Wikeley on anti-enforcement relief August 3, 2026
  • Beyond Domicile: The BHP Litigation and the Functional Interconnection of Public and Private International Law August 3, 2026
  • Conflicts of jurisdiction in Senegal: lesson from the Senegalese Supreme Court on Lis Pendens and the Exequatur of foreign judgments July 27, 2026
  • Adoption in the proposal for a European Parenthood Regulation July 21, 2026
  • Copyright, Targeting and Geo-Blocking: The CJEU Stirs the Pot July 15, 2026
  • A Follow-Up: The German Judges Association’s Response to the HCCH Draft Text of a Future Convention on Parallel Proceedings and Related Actions July 15, 2026
  • Private International Law Dimensions of Singapore’s New Legislation to Combat Online Harms July 14, 2026
  • The 1961 HCCH Apostille Convention: Why All African Countries Should Ratify It? — Insights from Judicial Practice in Africa July 14, 2026
  • The enforcement of an advance on costs for substitute performance at the expense of a Russian debtor in German-French legal relations July 2, 2026
  • “Yes, in principle, but not quite there yet…” – Some Observations on the Public Consultation on the HCCH Draft Text of a Future Convention on Parallel Proceedings and Related Actions June 29, 2026
  • Judgment Mobility Rules in India’s Private International Law Regime: No place for a revision au fond? June 26, 2026
  • Nothing to See Here: The CJEU’s Decision in Case C-232/25 Idzinski June 18, 2026
  • Refusal to Enforce in Egypt of a Californian (U.S.) Judgment for Lack of Reciprocity: What Has Gotten into the Egyptian Supreme Court? June 15, 2026
  • PRC Double Interest neither Double nor Penal: Australian Courts Clear Its Name When Enforcing Chinese Judgments June 10, 2026
  • The AIFC Court, Gazprom v Naftogaz and the Emergence of a New Conduit Jurisdiction Debate June 6, 2026
Scroll to top Scroll to top Scroll to top