Conflict of Laws
  • About
  • Editorial board
  • Subscription
  • Submission
  • Materials
  • Contact
  • Click to open the search input field Click to open the search input field Search
  • Menu Menu

About Tobias Lutzi

This author has not written his bio yet.
But we are proud to say that Tobias Lutzi contributed 250 entries already.

Entries by Tobias Lutzi

Out Now: Checa Martínez, Instituciones de estate planning y Derecho internacional privado patrimonial (Marcial Pons 2026)

March 2, 2026/in News/by Tobias Lutzi

Miguel Checa Martínez (Kinship Law) has kindly shared the following summary of his latest publication on ‘Instituciones de estate planning y Derecho internacional privado patrimonial’ with us.  

SLS Annual Conference 2026: Private International Law Section: Call for Papers

February 26, 2026/in News/by Tobias Lutzi

The following call was kindly shared with us by Michiel Poesen (University of Aberdeen). This is a call for papers and panels for the Private International Law subject section at the SLS Annual Conference 2026. This year, the annual conference will take place at the University of East Anglia in Norwich. The conference dates are: […]

Registrations now open: “Digitalisation of Justice: Perspectives from Germany and the Netherlands”

February 20, 2026/in News/by Tobias Lutzi

On Friday 29 May 2026 in Groningen, the Netherlands,

ZEuP – Zeitschrift für Europäisches Privatrecht 1/2026

February 18, 2026/1 Comment/in News/by Tobias Lutzi

A new issue of ZEuP – Zeitschrift für Europäisches Privatrecht is now available and includes contributions on EU private law, comparative law and legal history, legal unification, private international law, and individual European private law regimes. The full table of content can be accessed here:

HUK-COBURG II: A Case on Mandatory Overriding Law or Jurisdiction?

February 16, 2026/1 Comment/in Views/by Tobias Lutzi

By Ross Pey, Western University, Canada 1. Introduction In Case C-86/23 E.N.I. and Y.K.I. v HUK-COBURG-Allgemeine Versicherung AG II (‘HUK-COBURG II’), the principal issue that arose was whether a Bulgarian compensation provision may be interpreted as having mandatory effect. In suggesting that it does not, the Court required the facts to have sufficiently close links […]

Hybrid Lecture: Venezuela’s Oil, Between a Rock and a Hard (Arbitration) Place (UCL, 26 Feb 2026, 1pm)

February 9, 2026/in News/by Tobias Lutzi

Event type: Hybrid Date & time: 26 Feb 2026, 13:00 – 14:00 Speaker: Prof. Eugenio Hernández-Bretón, Universidad Central de Venezuela and Universidad Monteavila About the event: Over the past 50 years, Venezuela’s legal framework for the oil industry has been on a roller coaster. In 1975, the industry was nationalized, compensating private investors, but an […]

From Deference to Objectivity: How Courts Are Rewriting the Commercial Reservation

February 3, 2026/1 Comment/in Views/by Tobias Lutzi

By Taimoor Raza Sultan, Stockholm University Introduction The 1958 New York Convention (‘NYC’) is widely regarded as international arbitration’s most significant achievement. Having been ratified by over 160 states, , establishing a credible system of enforcement for arbitral awards. Yet the commercial reservation under Article 1(3), which allows the reserving state to limit the application […]

The Titanium Brace Tightens: Rome II and Director Liability after Wunner

January 16, 2026/2 Comments/in Views/by Tobias Lutzi

By Luisa Cassar Pullicino and Krista Refalo, Ganado Advocates In the preliminary reference Case C-77/24 Wunner (the Titanium Brace case), the CJEU was asked to determine whether a damages claim brought by a consumer directly against company directors for losses suffered from unlicensed online gambling fell within the scope of the Rome II Regulation (Regulation […]

Open Online Conference: “Cross-Border Enforcement of Child Support: Pros and Cons of the Different National Systems” on January 28th, 2026 3-5:30pm CET

January 14, 2026/in News/by Tobias Lutzi

The Child Support Forum in cooperation with the International Union of Judicial Officers is pleased to invite every interested stakeholders of the cross border child support recovery to an open conference on January 28th, 2026 from 3 to 5:30 pm (CET). According to Art. 41 of Regulation (EC) No. 4/2009 and Art. 32 of the […]

Perspectives Contentieuses Internationales (PCI), Volume 4

January 7, 2026/in News/by Tobias Lutzi

by Fabienne Jault-Seseke Volume 4 of the Revue Perspectives Contentieuses Internationales (PCI) has been published. Available in open access

Page 3 of 25‹12345›»

Categories

  • Views
  • News

Most Recent Posts

  • Support in cross-border transactions by Adults: Contract law vs capacity law August 12, 2026
  • Recognition of Italian Extrajudicial Divorces in Tunisia — Between Methodological Uncertainty and the Need to Preserve Continuity of Personal Status Across Borders August 9, 2026
  • Private International Law and European Society August 4, 2026
  • The New Zealand Supreme Court’s judgment in Kea Investments Ltd v Wikeley on anti-enforcement relief August 3, 2026
  • Beyond Domicile: The BHP Litigation and the Functional Interconnection of Public and Private International Law August 3, 2026
  • Conflicts of jurisdiction in Senegal: lesson from the Senegalese Supreme Court on Lis Pendens and the Exequatur of foreign judgments July 27, 2026
  • Adoption in the proposal for a European Parenthood Regulation July 21, 2026
  • Copyright, Targeting and Geo-Blocking: The CJEU Stirs the Pot July 15, 2026
  • A Follow-Up: The German Judges Association’s Response to the HCCH Draft Text of a Future Convention on Parallel Proceedings and Related Actions July 15, 2026
  • Private International Law Dimensions of Singapore’s New Legislation to Combat Online Harms July 14, 2026
  • The 1961 HCCH Apostille Convention: Why All African Countries Should Ratify It? — Insights from Judicial Practice in Africa July 14, 2026
  • The enforcement of an advance on costs for substitute performance at the expense of a Russian debtor in German-French legal relations July 2, 2026
  • “Yes, in principle, but not quite there yet…” – Some Observations on the Public Consultation on the HCCH Draft Text of a Future Convention on Parallel Proceedings and Related Actions June 29, 2026
  • Judgment Mobility Rules in India’s Private International Law Regime: No place for a revision au fond? June 26, 2026
  • Nothing to See Here: The CJEU’s Decision in Case C-232/25 Idzinski June 18, 2026
Scroll to top Scroll to top Scroll to top