Conflict of Laws
  • About
  • Editorial board
  • Subscription
  • Submission
  • Materials
  • Contact
  • Click to open the search input field Click to open the search input field Search
  • Menu Menu

About Tobias Lutzi

This author has not written his bio yet.
But we are proud to say that Tobias Lutzi contributed 254 entries already.

Entries by Tobias Lutzi

Reminder: Second German Conference for Young Scholars in PIL

February 21, 2019/in News/by Tobias Lutzi

Registration for the Second German Conference for Young Scholars in Private International Law, which will be held at the University of Würzburg on 4 and 5 April 2019, are still possible for another two weeks (until 10 March 2019). Further information can be found in

Job Vacancy: PhD/Research Assistant at the University of Cologne

February 14, 2019/in News/by Tobias Lutzi

The Institute for Private International and Comparative Law of the University of Cologne (Professor Mansel) is looking to appoint a Research Assistant (Wissenschaftliche/r Mitarbeiter/in) with knowledge of French, Italian, Dutch, or Spanish (edit: and who have completed a German State Exam in Law with an above-average degree). It is a part-time position with 19.92 hours […]

Call for Papers: SLS Conflict of Laws Section, Preston 2019

February 5, 2019/in News/by Tobias Lutzi

Since Conflict of Laws became a subject section at the Society of Legal Scholars in 2017, it has been part of the Society’s annual conference. This year’s conference, which will be held in Preston, UK, from 3 September to 6 September (right before the

Young Private International Law in Europe Workshop on ‘Recognition/Acceptance of Legal Situations’

January 8, 2019/in News/by Tobias Lutzi

Following the

UK Ratifies Hague Choice of Court and Hague Maintenance Conventions

January 3, 2019/1 Comment/in News/by Tobias Lutzi

As reported

Yearbook of Private International Law, Vol. XIX (2017/18)

October 16, 2018/in News/by Tobias Lutzi

The latest volume of the

Forcing a Square Peg into a Round Hole – The Actio Pauliana and the Brussels Ia Regulation

October 4, 2018/12 Comments/in Views/by Tobias Lutzi

Earlier today, the Court of Justice held that, under certain circumstances, special jurisdiction for an actio pauliana can be based on Art. 7(1) Brussels Ia (Case C-337/17 Feniks). The actio pauliana is an instrument provided by the national laws of several EU member states that allows the creditor to challenge fraudulent acts by their debtor […]

Montenegro Ratifies Hague Choice of Court Convention

August 29, 2018/in News/by Tobias Lutzi

(Only) last week, the government of the Netherlands – the depositary of the Convention –

Petronas Lubricants: ECJ confirms that Art 20(2) Brussels I can be used by employer for assigned counter-claim

June 24, 2018/in Views/by Tobias Lutzi

Last Thursday, the ECJ rendered a short (and rather unsurprising) decision on the interpretation of Art 20(2) Brussels I (= 22(2) of the Recast Regulation). In Petronas Lubricants

Nori Holdings: England & Wales High Court confirms ‘continuing validity of the decision in West Tankers’ under Brussels I Recast

June 16, 2018/in Views/by Tobias Lutzi

Earlier this month, the English High Court rendered an interesting decision on the (un-)availability of anti-suit injunctions in protection of arbitration agreements under the Brussels I Recast Regulation (No 1215/2012). In Nori Holdings v Bank Otkritie

Page 25 of 26«‹23242526›

Categories

  • Views
  • News

Most Recent Posts

  • Speaking for the Dead: Idziski and the Forum for Post-Mortem Likeness Claims September 7, 2026
  • Book Review: Andrew Dickinson and Alexander Thompson, The State Immunity Act 1978 (OUP, 2025) September 7, 2026
  • Political Immobilisation of Iranian Diaspora Property: Lex Situs, Human Rights and Public Policy August 22, 2026
  • The Demise of the Lex Domicilii Matrimonii in South African Private International Law August 18, 2026
  • Support in cross-border transactions by Adults: Contract law vs capacity law August 12, 2026
  • Recognition of Italian Extrajudicial Divorces in Tunisia — Between Methodological Uncertainty and the Need to Preserve Continuity of Personal Status Across Borders August 9, 2026
  • Private International Law and European Society August 4, 2026
  • The New Zealand Supreme Court’s judgment in Kea Investments Ltd v Wikeley on anti-enforcement relief August 3, 2026
  • Beyond Domicile: The BHP Litigation and the Functional Interconnection of Public and Private International Law August 3, 2026
  • Conflicts of jurisdiction in Senegal: lesson from the Senegalese Supreme Court on Lis Pendens and the Exequatur of foreign judgments July 27, 2026
  • Adoption in the proposal for a European Parenthood Regulation July 21, 2026
  • Copyright, Targeting and Geo-Blocking: The CJEU Stirs the Pot July 15, 2026
  • A Follow-Up: The German Judges Association’s Response to the HCCH Draft Text of a Future Convention on Parallel Proceedings and Related Actions July 15, 2026
  • Private International Law Dimensions of Singapore’s New Legislation to Combat Online Harms July 14, 2026
  • The 1961 HCCH Apostille Convention: Why All African Countries Should Ratify It? — Insights from Judicial Practice in Africa July 14, 2026
Scroll to top Scroll to top Scroll to top