Conflict of Laws
  • About
  • Editorial board
  • Subscription
  • Submission
  • Materials
  • Contact
  • Click to open the search input field Click to open the search input field Search
  • Menu Menu

About Gilles Cuniberti

Gilles Cuniberti is a professor of law at the University of Luxembourg. Previously, he taught for 10 years at the Faculty of Law of Paris 12 University (Paris Val-de-Marne). His primary teaching and research interests are comparative law, conflict of laws, international arbitration and international litigation. He is a regular contributor to the Journal de Droit International (Clunet). He has been a visiting faculty at Duke Law School, Renmin University of China and Sheffield Hallam University.

He holds a Doctorate in Law from Paris I Panthéon-Sorbonne University and an LL.M. degree from Yale Law School. He was also a Paris-Oxford Doctoral Program Scholar for a year at Trinity College, Oxford. He is admitted to the Paris Bar and practiced on a part-time basis in the Paris office of a leading English firm from 1999 to 2004.

SELECTED ARTICLES:
Beyond Contract - The Case for Default Arbitration in International commercial Disputes, 32 FORDHAM INT'L L.J. 417 (2009)
Le principe de territorialité des voies d'exécution, JOURNAL DU DROIT INTERNATIONAL 2008.963
The Recognition of Judgments Lacking Reasons in Europe: Access to Justice, Foreign Court Avoidance and Efficiency, 57 INT’L & COMP. L. Q. 25 (2008)
L’apprezzamento dell’efficacia della clausola arbitrale da parte del giudice statale : un conflitto tra Italia e Francia, 21 DIRITTO COMMERCIO INTERNAZIONALE 2007.789 (with M. Winkler)

E-mail: gilles.cuniberti@conflictoflaws.net

Entries by Gilles Cuniberti

Paris, Lugano or Brussels?

February 12, 2013/15 Comments/in /by Gilles Cuniberti

The Brussels I Regulation and the Lugano Convention have each a territorial scope based on the same criteria. But it is not always easy to assess which instrument applies in a given dispute. Take for instance a contract whereby a French bank assigned a claim to a French national domiciled in Switzerland. The contract contains a clause providing for the jurisdiction […]

First Issue of 2013’s Journal du Droit International

February 11, 2013/in /by Gilles Cuniberti

The first issue of French Journal du droit international (Clunet) for 2013 was just released. It contains two articles addressing issues of private international law and several casenotes. A full table of content is available

Sciences Po PILAGG Workshop Series, Spring 2013

February 8, 2013/in /by Gilles Cuniberti

The workshop on

Vogenauer on Regulatory Competition in Contract Matters

February 7, 2013/in /by Gilles Cuniberti

Stefan Vogenauer, who is Professor of Comparative Law at Oxford University, has published

Paris Court Orders Twitter to Provide Data on Antisemitic Tweets

February 5, 2013/in /by Gilles Cuniberti

On 24 January 2013, a French court

De Werra on ADR as a Default Method for IP Disputes

February 4, 2013/in /by Gilles Cuniberti

Jacques de Werra, who is a professor of law at the University of Geneva, has posted

German Federal Court Rules on Jurisdiction Clauses and Mandatory Rules

January 28, 2013/1 Comment/in /by Gilles Cuniberti

Kono and Jurcys on International Jurisdiction over the Cloud

January 17, 2013/in /by Gilles Cuniberti

Toshiyuki Kono and Paulius Jurcys (Kyushu University) have posted

Symeonides on Choice of Law in American Courts in 2012

January 15, 2013/in /by Gilles Cuniberti

Dean Symeon C. Symeonides (Willamette University – College of Law) has posted

Heidelberg-Vienna Report on the Application of the Insolvency Regulation

January 10, 2013/in /by Gilles Cuniberti

Today the EU-Commission published on its website the study on the application of the Insolvency Regulation in the 27 Member States (JUST/2011/JCIV/PR/0049/A4). This Report features the evaluation and the proposals for reforming the Insolvency Regulation which were presented by the EU-Commission in December 2012. It can be downloaded

Page 28 of 84«‹2627282930›»

Categories

  • Views
  • News

Most Recent Posts

  • Support in cross-border transactions by Adults: Contract law vs capacity law August 12, 2026
  • Recognition of Italian Extrajudicial Divorces in Tunisia — Between Methodological Uncertainty and the Need to Preserve Continuity of Personal Status Across Borders August 9, 2026
  • Private International Law and European Society August 4, 2026
  • The New Zealand Supreme Court’s judgment in Kea Investments Ltd v Wikeley on anti-enforcement relief August 3, 2026
  • Beyond Domicile: The BHP Litigation and the Functional Interconnection of Public and Private International Law August 3, 2026
  • Conflicts of jurisdiction in Senegal: lesson from the Senegalese Supreme Court on Lis Pendens and the Exequatur of foreign judgments July 27, 2026
  • Adoption in the proposal for a European Parenthood Regulation July 21, 2026
  • Copyright, Targeting and Geo-Blocking: The CJEU Stirs the Pot July 15, 2026
  • A Follow-Up: The German Judges Association’s Response to the HCCH Draft Text of a Future Convention on Parallel Proceedings and Related Actions July 15, 2026
  • Private International Law Dimensions of Singapore’s New Legislation to Combat Online Harms July 14, 2026
  • The 1961 HCCH Apostille Convention: Why All African Countries Should Ratify It? — Insights from Judicial Practice in Africa July 14, 2026
  • The enforcement of an advance on costs for substitute performance at the expense of a Russian debtor in German-French legal relations July 2, 2026
  • “Yes, in principle, but not quite there yet…” – Some Observations on the Public Consultation on the HCCH Draft Text of a Future Convention on Parallel Proceedings and Related Actions June 29, 2026
  • Judgment Mobility Rules in India’s Private International Law Regime: No place for a revision au fond? June 26, 2026
  • Nothing to See Here: The CJEU’s Decision in Case C-232/25 Idzinski June 18, 2026
Scroll to top Scroll to top Scroll to top