This author has not written his bio yet.
But we are proud to say that Charles Kotuby contributed 148 entries already.
While the long-term practical effect of Sinochem on the American doctrine of forum non conveniens remains to be seen, the Federal Courts of Appeals are beginning to shape the landscape in the first six months since the Court’s decision. The most significant forum non conveniens decision since Sinochem was recently handed-down by the Seventh Circuit. […]
Continuing the trend of interesting private international cases coming out of the patent and copyright fields (see previous posts
Here’s a quick roundup of significant caselaw from the U.S. Court of Appeals and Supreme Court relating to private international law issues. Two interesting actions relating to judgment enforcement have come down from the Ninth and D.C. Circuits. The latest salvo in Ministry of Defense for the Armed Froces of the Islamic Rep. of Iran […]
In a case previously blogged on
This post is written by
The U.S. Supreme Court decided an important dispute involving the jurisdictional rules that apply in U.S. federal courts. In Sinochem Int'l Co., Ltd. v. Malaysia International Shipping Corp., No. 06-102, Justice Ginsburg, writing for a unanimous court, held that "a district court has discretion to respond at once to a defendant’s forum non conveniens plea, and […]
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit recently held that a U.S. district court did not possess subject matter jurisdiction over the alleged infringement of a foreign patent. The case of
Dean Symeon Symeonides has just released his latest annual salvo into surveying the vast array of choice of law cases in American federal and state courts. Of the 2,598 conflicts cases referencing such matters this past year, the Survey focuses on those cases that may add something new to the development or understanding of choice of […]
On Tuesday, January 9, the Supreme Court heard argument in Sinochem v. Malaysia Int'l Shipping, regarding the doctrine of forum non conveniens in U.S. Courts. The case was previewed on this site
A recent article by Profs. Joseph D. Piotroski and Suraj Srinivasan tackles whether the stringent requirements of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act on U.S. issuers has had an empiracle effect on the cross-listing behavior on U.S. and U.K. stock exchanges. It has long been speculated that the Sarbanes-Oxley Act has displaced business from New York to London, where […]