No Sunset of Retained EU Conflict of Laws in the UK, but Increased Risk of Sunburn
By Dr Johannes Ungerer, University of Oxford The sunset of retained EU law in the UK has begun: the
This author has not written his bio yet.
But we are proud to say that Tobias Lutzi contributed 119 entries already.
By Dr Johannes Ungerer, University of Oxford The sunset of retained EU law in the UK has begun: the
On 26–28 October 2023, the University of Kiel will be hosting a conference on ‘EU Insolvency Law and Third Countries: Which Way(s) Forward?’. It is part of a research project coordinated by Professors Alexander Trunk (University of Kiel) and Jasnica Garasic (University of Zagreb), which is endorsed by UNCITRAL and supported by the Fritz Thyssen […]
Holger Spamann and Daniel Klerman recently conducted a most interesting experiment on judicial behavior in the context of conflict of laws, the results of which have been pre-published by the
The HCCH 2019 Judgments Convention has been the subject of
This post has been written by Anna Bleichenbacher, MLaw, University of Basel, Nievergelt & Stoehr Law and Notary Office (Switzerland). The Swiss Federal Supreme Court (Bundesgericht) published a leading decision on recognition and public certification of foreign conversions of ancient law pay paternities (Zahlvaterschaften) into paternities with civil status effects on June 15th, 2023 (decision […]
On September 1st, 2023, the
In 2014, Adrian Briggs published his own comprehensive account of English Private International Law, taking stock of centuries of English case law and decades of growing European influence. Other than the author’s unique ability to present even the most complex concepts with both clarity and style, the book’s strongest selling point arguably was his conscious […]
We are happy to announce the following new members of the
We are delighted to announce a lecture hosted by Matthias Weller at the University of Bonn in cooperation with ConflictofLaws.net. Professor
Less than half a year after the CJEU’s decision in Case C-646/20 Senatsverwaltung für Inneres (discussed