Conflict of Laws
  • About
  • Editorial board
  • Subscription
  • Submission
  • Materials
  • Contact
  • Click to open the search input field Click to open the search input field Search
  • Menu Menu

Franco-American Lis Pendens

December 17, 2009/in /by Gilles Cuniberti
image_pdfimage_print

It is not good to be a Franco-American couple these days.

Yesterday, the French supreme court for private and criminal matters (Cour de cassation) delivered yet another judgment on parallel divorce proceedings in the U.S. and in France.

The story was pretty much the same as in a case on which I have previously reported. The French husband sued in France, the American wife sued in New York. This time, however, the claims were not exactly the same. It seems that divorce was only sought in France, while a ruling on maintenance and parental responsibility was sought in both fora.

As it understood that it was the only one seized of the divorce action, the French court ruled on it and granted the divorce. However, on the maintenance and the parental responsability issues, the French court found that it had been seized second and declined jurisdiction on the ground of lis pendens. The husband appealed, but by the time the Paris Court of Appeal heard the case, the New York court had issued final judgments. The French Court of appeal held that, pursuant to the French common law of judgments, the American judgments were to be recognized. In particular, they were certainly not contrary to public policy for the sole reason that they had awarded what the husband considered too high a sum for maintenance.

In a judgment of december 16, 2009, the Cour de cassation confirmed the decision of the Paris Court of appeal.

The dates when each court was seized were disputed. But the Cour de cassation held again that whether the French court had been seized first was irrelevant for the purpose of assessing whether the American judgments should be recognised in France.

Share this entry
  • Share on Facebook
  • Share on X
  • Share on WhatsApp
  • Share on Pinterest
  • Share on LinkedIn
  • Share on Tumblr
  • Share on Vk
  • Share on Reddit
  • Share by Mail
https://conflictoflaws.net/News/2020/08/CoL_Banner-1.png 0 0 Gilles Cuniberti https://conflictoflaws.net/News/2020/08/CoL_Banner-1.png Gilles Cuniberti2009-12-17 11:24:342009-12-17 11:24:34Franco-American Lis Pendens

Categories

  • Views
  • News

Most Recent Posts

  • The New Zealand Supreme Court’s judgment in Kea Investments Ltd v Wikeley on anti-enforcement relief August 3, 2026
  • Beyond Domicile: The BHP Litigation and the Functional Interconnection of Public and Private International Law August 3, 2026
  • Conflicts of jurisdiction in Senegal: lesson from the Senegalese Supreme Court on Lis Pendens and the Exequatur of foreign judgments July 27, 2026
  • Adoption in the proposal for a European Parenthood Regulation July 21, 2026
  • Copyright, Targeting and Geo-Blocking: The CJEU Stirs the Pot July 15, 2026
  • A Follow-Up: The German Judges Association’s Response to the HCCH Draft Text of a Future Convention on Parallel Proceedings and Related Actions July 15, 2026
  • Private International Law Dimensions of Singapore’s New Legislation to Combat Online Harms July 14, 2026
  • The 1961 HCCH Apostille Convention: Why All African Countries Should Ratify It? — Insights from Judicial Practice in Africa July 14, 2026
  • The enforcement of an advance on costs for substitute performance at the expense of a Russian debtor in German-French legal relations July 2, 2026
  • “Yes, in principle, but not quite there yet…” – Some Observations on the Public Consultation on the HCCH Draft Text of a Future Convention on Parallel Proceedings and Related Actions June 29, 2026
  • Judgment Mobility Rules in India’s Private International Law Regime: No place for a revision au fond? June 26, 2026
  • Nothing to See Here: The CJEU’s Decision in Case C-232/25 Idzinski June 18, 2026
  • Refusal to Enforce in Egypt of a Californian (U.S.) Judgment for Lack of Reciprocity: What Has Gotten into the Egyptian Supreme Court? June 15, 2026
  • PRC Double Interest neither Double nor Penal: Australian Courts Clear Its Name When Enforcing Chinese Judgments June 10, 2026
  • The AIFC Court, Gazprom v Naftogaz and the Emergence of a New Conduit Jurisdiction Debate June 6, 2026
Link to: Rushing to Court or Rushing to Judgment? Link to: Rushing to Court or Rushing to Judgment? Rushing to Court or Rushing to Judgment? Link to: Google Loses in French Copyright Case Link to: Google Loses in French Copyright Case Google Loses in French Copyright Case
Scroll to top Scroll to top Scroll to top